Search results

SOE should continue to make EQN as it is. LOLCRAFTMMORPG. But they should almost make EQ3 with trinity, EQ/VG combat and Innoruuk.

Authored content appears to be semi-static. They gave the example of the relic. The relic is always there but whoever controls the relic may change based on groups in the area. POI are semi-static in that from the discussion it appears they're going to have the same mobs. However, the POIs...

There's static content. Areas of authored content won't be destructible or only limited destructibility or very rapid "healing" (return to area base state) based on the needs of the AC. So they could build LGuk and either: 1. Make it entirely non-destructible. 2. Make it so you can destroy a...

There are static raids and dungeons. There is authored content (the get the relic from the mine example) which are EQN's version of static quests Otherwise: PvP (Non-FFA, Possibly Evelike, Possibly SOE will pick some percentage of the Tier 5 areas of the continent and say FFA PvP in these...

They have to change this for EQN. The EQN team's worst decision, someone needs to start feeding the lore team only bread and water until the rewrite the lore to include Inny.

I think this is quite possible. It seems like an obvious move because it's cheap. I do think the fans shouldn't wait. Do a freaking letter writing campaign. But shit like "EQN sucks" isn't helpful - as I said, it'll be huge and I really think PvPers will love it. I think a: if we build the...

Well they've got big plans for the RC's so maybe but it all depends on how StoryBricks works. However, I think the everyday stuff that keeps people coming back will be the guild on guild conflict over resources (a la EVE). Which is certainly better than dailies :-)

You mean me? The game will be huge and I'll enjoy playing it when it comes out. I understand most of the decisions the devs have made (e.g. no autoattack, makes no sense in a non-taunt, non-trinity world, where the mob is moving based on constantly changing threat evaluation). And I even...

We need both EQN and EQ3. Though I think the lore reboot on EQN was excessive and needs to be dialed back. Innoruuk should be in the game. @Caeden EQN looks fun, just not a game I want to play long term. I played both LOL, Minecraft and Terria for a couple of months and enjoyed them, but a...

if I win Powerball I'll make that game for you et

pvp is in. Kos in. Some elements speculation such as number could be 3. Evelike is speculation but it is not ffa. People going to freak when announced.

Just meant potentially 4 kos factions. Pvp will be eve. Tiers will be equiv to security levels. Tier 5 is 0.0

Earliest release date Sep 2014. Latest June 2015. Heavily dependent on how much players contribute via landmark. Thus the enormous window. I predict more traditional eq3 announced next year/early 2015 once eqnext beta is humming along. soe would be stupid not to given 80% if the game would...

did you not get how multi classing worked?

nope except something on storybricks.

They need to make eq3 using same engine and assets.

they are making lol the mmo. The game is designed for pvp. Thus emphasis on player class identification

will be kos.

That's the beauty. Most of the stuff for eqn can be reused for eq3. And the players will help building in landmark.

Heading out here our my final thoughts on soe live/eqnext. I think soe has missed an opportunity for a hat trick and we, the player base, need to "help" them. Landmark - awesome for people who love minecraft. EQN - awesome for mmo pvpers. Dumar and Nirgon will go nuts when soe reveals the...

I've had a similar thought. I assume SOE will sell templates for landmark.

You're confusing what you like with what other people like. I'm telling you it is LOL the MMO + Minecraft. The average gamer will go nuts when it's complete. I don't play Minecraft much anymore, I find it dull, but I recognize that millions of people love it. SOE should make a ton and they...

I think eq fans who want a real eq3 should tell soe, we will support eqnext we want your company to be successful but we want eq3 once eq next is making you money hand over fist. The models are so different they can coexist.

Nope.

With respect to @qwerty, @tiled and etc. I think SOE needs to make a true successor to EQ. Call it EQ3. EQNext is really LOL the MMO meets Minecraft. Which isn't a bad idea at all, and looks pretty fun. It will scratch the roleplaying itch but I don't know if it will scratch the AD&D itch...

look at support classes in lol.

Normal warrior asskicked by casters mob or pc but can kill rock golems. Magebane loadout kills casters but roflstomped by rock golem.

its going to be more like lol. Some class combos are not going to be able to kill particular mobs. See the magebane example

Wait for beta

Posting the Q&A

Nah. Just checkout the beta and you will see.

eh some ragers, some excited . I couldn't care less for the whiners. Some chick in a cart spent a minute telling the world it needed to accommodate her better while people behind her had been standing fir 45 minutes to ask their questions The game design is epic just like eq1 if you don't...

If they pull it off, we'll all be playing it. Anyone saying anything different is wrong.

Not how it works.

I don't think the game is going to be as easy as some of you seem to think.

Weapon skills are weapon and class specific.

They said less sound and fury in general. That was for the demo.

Raids already confirmed.

Limitations on mix and match based on base class abilities. If hypothetical Brawler class has 4 offense abilities you can not slot utility, defense, or movement from anyone.

EQ 1++ would be nice.