so you mean pirate it right? Fuck paying for Sunday ticket. I'm still mad that I have to pay for Youtube TV but my wife is a TV junkie.The one game is on general Youtube, and is apparently part of the package that bought NFL Sunday Ticket rights for this year: The Exclusive Home of NFL Sunday Ticket - YouTube & YouTube TV
Note that this version of Sunday Ticket does require you to already have a YoutubeTV sub, so its not quite as enticing if you aren't already a sub for that.
Getting an epidural, I didn’t even know he was pregnant 🫃Jerra playing 6d chess?
![]()
Sources: Parsons may get back injection to play
Packers pass rusher Micah Parsons has been dealing with an L4/L5 facet joint sprain in his back and he may receive an injection before Sunday's game against the Detroit Lions if needed to help him play, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter.www.espn.com
Wait, we got la flama blanca?2 1sts and Kenny Clark.
It aint no herchel trade, not enough picks/potential picks. But it is similar in that it's the best player on the team, everyone across the board thinks it's idiotic, and his own fans hate him for it. We'll have to wait 2-3 years and see if we start winning superbowls I guess.Could be a hershel like trade. Dude they got in return ain't no slouch
Getting an epidural, I didn’t even know he was pregnant 🫃
This sort of rationalization only makes sense if Jerrah had done this shit much earlier in the offseason. As it is, we got Parsons for two picks we likely won't need and in a contract that is very cap friendly. And (barring injury) Parsons fills a major hole in our defense, even if he misses some time for whatever reason. Really the only major gap we have after this is secondary, unless Parsons is a total bust (unlikely, at least in the regular season). As a Packer Fan, it feels like we engaged in elder abuse by making this trade with Jerrah.I can see a world where getting 2 firsts and not having to pay $47M a year isn't the worst thing for Dallas in the medium term. But he could have gotten more draft capital had he made him available back before the Draft, and would have gotten picks that helped this year.
Is it cap friendly? All I've seen is 'highest paid non QB' and 'shitload of guaranteed money'. I think I heard early on that the guaranteed money was the sticking point with jerrah. I know there are ways to make those contracts cap friendly, but if there's an injury that guaranteed money suddenly becomes very un cap friendly.As it is, we got Parsons for two picks we likely won't need and in a contract that is very cap friendly.
Was this a typo? We did get clark. Who were you talking about? Surely you weren't talking about the QB.I am more worried about Love's health than Parsons. If Jerrah had actually thought about it, This is not Aaron Rodgers with a glass jaw here. This is a 27 year old player at their apex of physical ability. The guy Jerrah should have demanded in the trade was Clark and I am fucking baffled at how we even got to keep him on the same roster as Parsons.
This sort of rationalization only makes sense if Jerrah had done this shit much earlier in the offseason. As it is, we got Parsons for two picks we likely won't need and in a contract that is very cap friendly. And (barring injury) Parsons fills a major hole in our defense, even if he misses some time for whatever reason. Really the only major gap we have after this is secondary, unless Parsons is a total bust (unlikely, at least in the regular season). As a Packer Fan, it feels like we engaged in elder abuse by making this trade with Jerrah.
Before the start of this offseason, the top of the edge rusher market was Nick Bosa's contract, which came in at $34 million per season. At that point, Bosa was the only edge rusher in the league making more than $28.5 million per year, meaning the 49ers star was already a meaningful outlier relative to the rest of the players at his position.
Since then, the top has blown off. Myles Garrett's new four-year deal averaged $40 million per season, while T.J. Watt's $41 million contract took the price for edge rushers up even further. Though I suspect there's some fluff in Parsons' contract, the early reports suggest that his new deal with the Packers is for four years and $188 million, averaging a whopping $47 million per year. That's 38% more than what Bosa was making and 66% more than the average salary of the second-largest edge rusher contract (Josh Hines-Allen, $28.25 million) heading into the 2025 league year.
By trading those two first-rounders to the Cowboys, the Packers are incurring the opportunity cost of missing out on potential starters and roster contributors on below-market deals. We'll never see who they would have picked, of course, but they'll need to fill their roster in other ways, either by signing free agents or by using other draft picks that are less likely to pan out in place of those potential first-rounders.
Ben Baldwin's non-quarterback draft value chart attempts to place a number on what each pick in the draft is worth. If we operate conservatively and assume that the Packers will send the 24th pick in the 2026 and 2027 drafts to the Cowboys, without any future draft discounts, that's an additional $18.2 million per year in opportunity costs that the Packers are assuming by making this trade. You can quibble with the figure, of course, but one thing I can say for sure is that valuing the picks as being worth $0 is wrong.
You have to include the value of what it took to acquire Parsons as part of these numbers. And with the cost of those picks added on top of his deal, Parsons will cost the Packers more than $65 million per season over the next four years. The four-time Pro Bowler will make more, at least implicitly, than any other player in the game -- his old teammate Prescott included -- and twice as much as Bosa, who was the highest-paid edge rusher in the NFL a few months ago.
Yeah sorry I meant Gary.You won't get any argument from me on mcdumbass (I'm not going to make fun of his weight because I'm a fatass too). But parsons was part of the problem with the run D. It will be interesting to see if he still gets hurt and production drops off at the end of the year. If he doesn't that might mean something is wrong with the cowboys training staff.
BTW when I said injury in the last post, I mean season or career ending injury. I've personally been worried about that with him the last 2 years. He's a warrior. He gets banged up and still wants to play at 80% or even 50%. But those are the times when you take serious injuries.
Was this a typo? We did get clark. Who were you talking about? Surely you weren't talking about the QB.
[/QUOTE]Not really rationalization, just pointing out the obvious. He always lets his ego get in the way and waits until the last minute to do deals. Dak, Lamb, etc. If he realizes they aren't going to get a deal done for whatever reason earlier, they likely get an additional mid round pick in the bidding leading up to the draft. Plus they'd have actually gotten and extra 1st this year and potentially another pick this year to help out the team this year.
I don't know how cap friendly the deal is, seemed weird to go $5M a year average over everyone else. And while you can make the case you won't "need the picks", the opportunity cost of not being able to have 2 young potential starters (even if mid to late picks) on cheap deals for the next 4-5 years is something nobody usually factors in.
Barnwell: The NFL-altering Micah Parsons trade, and what comes next for the Cowboys and Packers
Now they note there is probably some fluff in Parson's contract, and I'm not sure what exact details have come out to show exactly how much fluff there is. Also they're guessing what picks GB would be sending to Dallas, so not exact science. But the opportunity cost is real.
All that said, he does fill the biggest need on their defense, which was already pretty damn good. Packers all in, and have to be considered legit contenders if they can get the play out of Love they hope for.
The one thing Dallas actually does well is draft. Those late round picks will never be used at the numbers they come in at. THey will either be packaged with Dallas earlier picks to move up even further in the 1st round or traded down to get more picks later. Moving up for a Dak replacement would be ideal.The only thing a couple of late 1st rounders will potentially do for the Cowboys is maybe give them a shot at a serviceable CB or WR. Not elite, but good enough for the money. And Dallas probably needs some depth in both areas, so I don't entirely laugh at that rationalization as pure cope. But they handled this whole thing in the worst possible way because thats what Jerrah does.