You still haven't pointed out what rule I broke. You even admitted the ban wasn't right.
That is talking about AFTER an appeal. Once again, not a rule broken. I protected a user.I've posted it twice. Here's a third:
12.) Moderator actions are final after the first appeal is denied by a majority moderator decision. There is no escalation after moderators. The admins are here to work on the site itself and not deal with any of the rules and regulations other than that, as a result they will not arbitrate except in extreme situations.
That is talking about AFTER an appeal. Once again, not a rule broken. I protected a user.
I already also stated it was an EXTREME situation (how is that defined) where a user was unjustly banned and can make no appeal while banned.
How can he appeal when banned? None of them can see it. They don't have access to the official email.You didnt even wait for an appeal which is a part of the problem. Also acting like he had no way of appealing while being banned is just playing dumb. He managed to appeal to you, didn't he? He even admitted to creating and posting under an alt which is against another rule, but you choose to ignore that too. The way you pick and choose when to follow THE RULES GUYZ and when to unilaterally overrule them is complete bullshit.
We should let Draegan run for admin next voting session
Let me know I'm considering it, though seems like Cad is going to hold true to his word. I'll become a donor regardless after he is banned.
You realize that if you apply the rules like this, then you are giving mods the power to basically ban anyone for anyone reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it right? I mean a banned user cannot appeal. Uber was flat banned for not breaking any written rule. Is this what you want?