Daezuel
Potato del Grande
- 25,542
- 66,701
I trust
Mario Speedwagon
and @AngryGerbil to make proper decisions. Seems like the rest of them need to go back to being regular posters because they can't handle a simple fucking job.- 3
- 1
Poll Cad Impeachment Vote
- Thread starter kegkilla
- Start date
- Status
Mario Speedwagon
and @AngryGerbil to make proper decisions. Seems like the rest of them need to go back to being regular posters because they can't handle a simple fucking job.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,387
- 66,686
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,387
- 66,686
You realize the warnings will give him a 30 day RRP right? I gave him a 3 day thread ban. Which is worse? Fucking tard.
- 2
Daezuel
Potato del Grande
- 25,542
- 66,701
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,387
- 66,686
He knew exactly what he was doing and why he was doing it. No sympathy.
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,917
- 16,398
- 19,525
- 72,218
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,387
- 66,686
Indeed there is. But why change it?
With as few warnings as we give out, honestly you have to be like a king shitposter to hit 3 even if they never expired.
- 1
khalid
Unelected Mod
- 14,071
- 6,775
My understanding is that Cad wanted to try the thread-ban because he thought that another warning was harsher than a 3 day thread-ban that would allow him to post everywhere else.
Now maybe that was a mistake, but it seems to have been a mistake based on not wanting to over-moderate. So the accusations of him being a nazi and that AngryGerbil is making the right decisions only kinda holds up if you think Olscratch should have been dealt with more harshly shrug.
Now maybe that was a mistake, but it seems to have been a mistake based on not wanting to over-moderate. So the accusations of him being a nazi and that AngryGerbil is making the right decisions only kinda holds up if you think Olscratch should have been dealt with more harshly shrug.
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,917
- 16,398
Next time, just say something that says "Next time you get a thread ban for three days." Again, thread ban is not anywhere in the rules, was never even informally talked as a consequence of one warning. You can say all day that Olscratch wouldn't have changed his ways but you have to give him the chance because up until you did it, it was reasonable to think he might get a second warning, not a thread ban.
Also, because of the boilerplate text, he might have just thought it was for having so many links without other content, and not general posting habits. So, if he stopped the multi-linking, he could have thought he was okay going forward, especially since so many other people shitpost without problem.
But it seems you'd rather just ban and think about it later.
Also, because of the boilerplate text, he might have just thought it was for having so many links without other content, and not general posting habits. So, if he stopped the multi-linking, he could have thought he was okay going forward, especially since so many other people shitpost without problem.
But it seems you'd rather just ban and think about it later.
- 2
- 1
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,387
- 66,686
Thought: If he was just going to shitpost in the politics thread until he gets 3 warnings, then the thread ban was the right thing to do. Far more surgical. Outside of the politics thread and shitposting about the politics thread in comments/suggestions, he seems reasonable elsewhere. Which goes to show he's just trolling for the lulz.
- 1
iannis
Musty Nester
- 31,351
- 17,661
Olscratch
tour de salt
- 2,114
- 536
13 years of foh political thread posting and this is my first ban, and the reasons given so far have been vaguely described shitposting, not enough effort, and not enough content. Despite lack of content cad still spent 48 hours arguing directly with me in the political thread before resorting to pussyshit.
Lemme grab it cad.
Lemme grab it cad.
- 2
- 1
Daezuel
Potato del Grande
- 25,542
- 66,701
A lawyer that can't follow procedures, go figure. The point is if you guys would follow the procedures before summarily passing judgment a poster would know why they're being punished and have a chance to change their behavior. At that point if they disagree they can then use the appeals process. A warning also allows a poster to appeal that warning before action is taken.
Afaik one warning then punishment is not the proper procedure. And again we're talking about alleged shit posting and not some instant ban worthy action like doxxing.
Comparing a warning that by itself does nothing but alert a poster that their posts are being monitored to a thread ban with no justification given is fucking retarded, but I expect that from most mods at this point.
Afaik one warning then punishment is not the proper procedure. And again we're talking about alleged shit posting and not some instant ban worthy action like doxxing.
Comparing a warning that by itself does nothing but alert a poster that their posts are being monitored to a thread ban with no justification given is fucking retarded, but I expect that from most mods at this point.
- 2
- 1
- Status