Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare 2016
- Thread starter spronk
- Start date
- 5,661
- 6,179
It's definitely one of the better FPS packages (campaign + multiplayer) that you could possibly buy. Game was absolutely a home run, one of the better ones ever made. I think I would only, personally, have it behind games like BF1942, Half-Life, Bioshock, original Halo etc in the FPS department.
Man, I just can't talk myself into buying this game. From a principal stand point I wanna say fuck them for making me buy a game I don't have any interest in (whatever the new title is). But I am also not a broke-asshole and really have nothing other than "principal" as to why I do not want to buy the game for the remaster. I often find myself still hopping on MW on PC or MW2 and really wishing MW2 had dedicated servers.
Dilemma, dilemma bros...
Lost Virtue
Trakanon Raider
- 2,320
- 267
Utnayan
I Love Utnayan he’s awesome
- 16,291
- 12,054
Oh don't worry. Let's bring people back down to earth. No pun intended.
Activision Blizzard (ATVI) will allow gamers to pay between $15 and $50 for bonus content
Activision Blizzard (ATVI) will allow gamers to pay between $15 and $50 for bonus content
spronk
FPS noob
- 22,602
- 25,653
Call of Duty is imo better than battlefield and others when it comes to DLC. For Infinite Warfare, $100 gets you an absolutely insane amount of content - Infinite Warfare, the full season pass, solo/co-op single player campaign, casual multiplayer mode, ranked multiplayer mode, custom games (which have many hooks in pro websites), solo/co-op zombies game that is BIGGER than the campaign imo, PLUS modern warfare 4 remastered and 16 MP maps. The MP modes of COD are also not to be trivialized, there is a lot of content there especially with prestige leveling, hundreds of weapons and skins, class customization, etc. Even still, the $60 base version gets you everything except season pass and modern warfare.
By contrast Battlefield 1 / Titanfall 2 is $130 for the "best" version and you don't get nearly as much as COD content wise. Also EA charges $20 extra for the "deluxe" versions which include only some digital goodies like badges / skins and 3 day early access.
Still, map splits are lame on both sides and in general the DLC maps tend to disappear from playlists after a month or so, making the DLC value proposition very limited. Still, its only $20 more on COD vs $50 on Battlefield.
By contrast Battlefield 1 / Titanfall 2 is $130 for the "best" version and you don't get nearly as much as COD content wise. Also EA charges $20 extra for the "deluxe" versions which include only some digital goodies like badges / skins and 3 day early access.
Still, map splits are lame on both sides and in general the DLC maps tend to disappear from playlists after a month or so, making the DLC value proposition very limited. Still, its only $20 more on COD vs $50 on Battlefield.
Regime
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
- 16,421
- 37,797
- 17,781
- 25,896
COD has always been better than Battlefield imo. Battlefield is good and all, but I love the tight gun battles. Tanks and jeeps just aren't the same.
spronk
FPS noob
- 22,602
- 25,653
black ops 3 is interesting and totally hidden, most people have no idea that BO3 uses dedicated servers on PC and a mix of servers and p2p on console, emphasizing ping rate for connection over all else. I dunno what IW has but I doubt you'll ever see rich server browsers and stuff like that in a COD game
Regime
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
- 16,421
- 37,797