College Football 2014-15

Kaines

Potato Supreme
18,440
51,890
It isn't just titles, that is simply a factor. Fan base size (Miami check), history of winning (Miami check), titles (Miami check, including a particularly juicy one in the 1991 Cotton Bowl), tradition (Miami check), money (Miami check), and geography (seriously? It's in the high 70's still) are all factors. Florida checks every box except a very long tradition, their success is more recent relative to other elite programs.
Miami Hurricanes football - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yup, sign Miami up.
 

Foggy

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,394
5,010
Miami has a tiny (absolutely horrible) fan base, no money, and only one concentrated run of success. I wasn't aware Miami really had all that tradition either. Miami doesn't even own a football stadium for fucks sake.

You even suck at trolling.
 

Borzak

Silver Baron of the Realm
26,648
35,474
Miami has 20k students across a couple of campuses where UT has 52k at just the Austin campus. I think they did a lot for thier size. That's almost community college size in some areas.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
They're not.

tOSU
UM
ND
USC
Alabama
OU
Texas
The only team in NCAA football iwould currently list as a "blue blood" is Alabama. Michigan is not even close. Most of those teams are either declining or irrelevant (nationally). Blue blood teams don't have losing records.

USC and OU are close, but not quite. And yes, Georgia is as close as any on that list save for the tide.
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,930
23,767
Did you just seriously argue that there is one blue blood team in the entire country and it happens to be the team you root for? Seems like a legit argument.

I actually think Dumar's list is pretty good (ugh) because those teams tend to be given weight in most people's mind even in down years. They take the smallest hits from losses, the make the largest jumps when they win, and every year is a year that they could go from a losing record to winning a title. I would argue that the two teams in the past 20 years closest to making that list are actually LSU and FSU. Georgia doesn't even sniff it.
 

Joeboo

Molten Core Raider
8,157
140
I'd go with:

Alabama
Florida
Florida St
Ohio St
Michigan
Notre Dame
USC
Oklahoma
Texas

If you haven't even sniffed a title in the past 10-15 years, or go 2 or 3 new coaching staffs without getting near one, you're dangerously close to falling off the list. Nebraska probably recently fell off it, Michigan is getting really close. Give Michigan 5 more years of not being in the national title picture and they're off, Notre Dame is lucky they had that 1 good year where they played for a title, or they would be in the exact same boat as Nebraska currently. Alternately, play for multiple national titles and win at least one, and you're just about on the list. Oregon is about the only team not listed that is getting close. If they can win a national title in the next couple years, and maybe get into the playoff a couple more times, I'd add them.

edit - I guess LSU is close too, but Miles needs to at least get into a few playoffs(or win one) with a player-base that is 100% his own. His only title was a tad too close to the Saban tenure for my liking. I feel like LSU is slowly getting further away, rather than closer.

I think the main criteria comes down to proving that your program can compete for, and hopefully win multiple national titles under multiple different coaching staffs. That proves that your program is a juggernaut that is going to be successful almost regardless of who coaches(as long as they aren't a total trainwreck of a coach). But even if you have a history of that, going a couple decades in a row of being mediocre can ruin that past tradition(Nebraska, Michigan).
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,930
23,767
I agree with most of what you posted Joe, but the thing about blue bloods is that one good year can throw them right back onto the list. If Nebraska puts together one or two years of playoff level ball then everyone will talk about their resurgence and how good it is to have a traditional power back on top. Oregon will have to go through a 5-8 year stretch of true mediocrity and come out strong again on the other side to start being in the conversation, much like FSU just did with their most recent two years of success.
 

Joeboo

Molten Core Raider
8,157
140
I agree with most of what you posted Joe, but the thing about blue bloods is that one good year can throw them right back onto the list. If Nebraska puts together one or two years of playoff level ball then everyone will talk about their resurgence and how good it is to have a traditional power back on top. Oregon will have to go through a 5-8 year stretch of true mediocrity and come out strong again on the other side to start being in the conversation, much like FSU just did with their most recent two years of success.
That's why I definitely think it takes more than a decade of mediocrity, closer to two before a program like the ones I mentioned are down and gone for good from elite status. Florida State was down for the last 9-10 years of Bobby Bowdens tenure before Jimbo got them back in the picture. Florida definitely remembers the Ron Zook era that unsuccessfully bridged the gap between Spurrier and Urban Meyer title runs(but that was only 3 or 4 bad years, nowhere near a decade). Alabama was crap for most of the late 90s and early 2000s, Texas sucked hard for about 15 years in the late 80s & 90s, etc.

Programs can most definitely go down for a decade or so, it's the elite ones that eventually come roaring back like they never missed a beat. At this point, it's been 15 years since Nebraska was relevent, I dont know that they can come back, and Michigan has only had 2 good seasons in the past decade, 1 under Carr and 1 under Hoke, so they still have shown the occasional rare flash of being elite, they haven't been able to sustain it to prove they are back. They're circling the drain as well.
 

Regime

LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
<Gold Donor>
17,367
41,780
Florida and UGA aren't even in the conversation. Tennessee is easily the second most storied program in the SEC. Tennesee and Texas are very comparable historically, both behind Oklahoma/ND/Bama.
Florida and Georgia are not blue bloods.

LOL Gil and Dumar have so much in common. It all makes sense. They need to go down to Dr. Marios thread and seek help with their case of the butthurts.

Dude you crack me up. Tennesee is not even close to a
storiedprogram. The only (2) people saying Florida isn't a blue blood are the guys who had their teams reputations absolutely destroyed by Florida this decade. Anytime Tennesee is brought up its "Peyton Manning and how they are the new Vanderbilt."

It will take an entire generation of football fans to stop laughing and forget how Ohio State and Tennesse repeatedly deep throated Albert's gloriously green gargantuan Gator cock.

P.s. Gil you need to setup college
Bowl Maina.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
Ithink all of those teams are top tier programs, except Michigan and Tennessee (with Tennessee going up and Michigan going down).

But a true, modern day blue blood? No.

tOSU, FSU, ORE, UF, UGA, are all on the verge. tOSU and FSU are basically there. II can't give it to FSU with the only title coming off awin vs, what should have been, athree loss SEC team. And tOSU needs to finish as well.

Now, if you want to call any school with a top tier coaching job a blue blood, ok. But i don't.
 

Joeboo

Molten Core Raider
8,157
140
Uhh, Florida St has 3 national titles in the past 20 years. Last year wasn't their first. They had 2 in the 90s.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
Did you just seriously argue that there is one blue blood team in the entire country and it happens to be the team you root for? Seems like a legit argument.
The argument has nothing to do with who I root for... And yes, imo, there is one blue blood program in the country, and they play in the cconference I root for.

You guys need to evaluate how you look at programs. 20yrs ago it would hold up, but go ask some five star / blue chip recruit who Bo Schembeckler / Knute Rockney were... Or even Tom Osborne, history does not help programs recruit how it used to. And that means that teams ability to compete erodes much faster than it would have 20yrs ago.

Brian Kelley talked about that exact issue before Notre dame played northwestern. And they lost as 21 point favorites to anon traditional power.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
Uhh, Florida St has 3 national titles in the past 20 years. Last year wasn't their first. They had 2 in the 90s.
Right, if they win this year and stay strong / Jimbo doesn't leave, then maybe. II know the history of "The Program".

With where the game is right now, how volatile teams and coaches are, ihate to toss out any claim to lasting quality until ican do so in retrospect. In ten years I might look back at whatever dynasty we are watching form, but idon't want to project.

Hell, Saban wins, then retires, and Alabama goes into the tank... That is hard to project and people will hold onto them being an elite team long after their freefall has reached terminal velocity towards the ground.
 

Gilgamel

A Man Chooses....
2,869
52
LOL Gil and Dumar have so much in common.
That's the cruelest thing anyone has ever said to me, even worse than that time I had sex outside in the winter. IT WAS COLD.

But anyway, college football is all about tradition and history and shit right? So why does only the last 25 years matter? We all should know by now that the difference between coaching at any of these top programs is minimal and it's all about the coach. If Urban or Saban or any other competent coach went to any of them he'd be hugely successful. So when UT has Fulmer they win 73% of their games. When OSU has Urban they do similarly. When Florida has a great coach, wow, they win. When Texas has a shitty coach, they are not some historic powerhouse, they are Texas with a shitty coach. So short term success means less to me than overall program attractiveness and the commitment of the fanbase/administration. UT has a 100k+ stadium, a tradition you can compare to any other, and we didn't get fucked by the changing walk-on rules like Nebraska did. In fact recruiting in and around Tennessee has never been better than it is right now, and we'll always be able to pull national recruits when we're not in the shitter. So while some program's resumes are just flat better, it's going to take more than 10 years of being down for me to put a program out to pasture. If Tennessee was in the Big 10 we wouldn't be nearly as "down" as it looks going against the schedule we do every year and playing quality non-conference games, which pretty much two other teams in the SEC even bother to do.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
Ask UT and A&M if tradition and history mattered when they killed their rivalry game.

History ans tradition used to matter, but that has fallen to avery distant second behind money.

And if you want to hold onto stupid, then army should be considered ablue blood, I think they were really good about 60 years ago

Gig, use paragraphs for fucks sake. Not reading that wall of unformatted text diarrhea.
 

Joeboo

Molten Core Raider
8,157
140
Honestly, I put Tennessee in the same category as a Georgia, or Auburn, or LSU. Huge following, massive fanbase, recruits nationally and throughout their the majority of their history has been a nationally relevant team more often than not. But not *quite* on par with that top echelon of historical CFB teams like Alabama, Ohio St, USC, Texas, Oklahoma, etc.

Tennessee just happens to be going through their crap period right now(and maybe coming out of it, but it's too early to tell for certain) that every team goes through at some point.

I think each power 5 conference has basically 2 "blue blood" teams. SEC has Alabama and FLorida, B10 has Ohio St & Michigan, B12 has Texas and Oklahoma, ACC has Florida St and we'll go ahead and give them Notre Dame, since ND is a partial member of the ACC now, and I guess the Pac 12 is the one conference with just USC, although they have the 1 team that is closest to joining the club in Oregon.
 

Foggy

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,394
5,010
Ask UT and A&M if tradition and history mattered when they killed their rivalry game.

History ans tradition used to matter, but that has fallen to avery distant second behind money.

And if you want to hold onto stupid, then army should be considered ablue blood, I think they were really good about 60 years ago

Gig, use paragraphs for fucks sake. Not reading that wall of unformatted text diarrhea.
Texas and A&M were just pissed at each other and, in hindsight, foolishly ended it. Every year more and more of the fans want the game back. Thanksgiving just is not the same.

That being said, SCOREBOARD!