Yes they are. But due to our reduced density most will not see much benefit, if at allOur companies are subsidized, as well.
Yes they are. But due to our reduced density most will not see much benefit, if at allOur companies are subsidized, as well.
No it doesn't. 10% of the population doesn't constitute a narrow demographic. Your own article definesAmerican Idolas non-niche and it comprises a viewership of between 10-20% of the television equipped population.
Well, at least you have sweet internet.I have no clue because
1. streaming will always have a lower bitrate compared to what you can get from torrents.
2. it's fast enough to download everything in minutes. I wanted to say seconds but by the time it connects to enough seeders to go over 300-400 mbps it's already done(hmm, third world internet problems?!).
3. the minimum wage here is ~220$ / month so even if netflix/hulu were unblocked, no one will pay for that.
Fun fact that I forgot earlier,Romaniais one of the most corrupt country in the European Union. If you think your providers are bribing the goverment, think about what you can do here not that anyone would dare to fuck with our internet.
I guess you need to be a bit more clear on that. Reading this whole thread, you sound like an ISP sympathizer. However, if your true intent is that ISPs could easily handle all the traffic if the government wasn't corrupt as fuck, well, yeah. I'm betting this thread would have been a few pages shorter if you just started there.It isn't asshole consumers. I encourage streaming. My posts have went a little to left field but I support net neutrality. My original point is exactly that. Urban Internet as a whole will not get better until one of the three limits are imposed or rates increase. Because Com cast and the government don't care.
It cites fuckingsports viewersas niche. 10% is niche. Given the total possible market for broadband, I don't see how you could possibly define specifically targeting a small subset of that population with a focused, unique product as anything but niche.No it doesn't. 10% of the population doesn't constitute a narrow demographic. Your own article definesAmerican Idolas non-niche and it comprises a viewership of between 10-20% of the television equipped population.
No, that isn't it at all.I guess you need to be a bit more clear on that. Reading this whole thread, you sound like an ISP sympathizer. However, if your true intent is that ISPs could easily handle all the traffic if the government wasn't corrupt as fuck, well, yeah. I'm betting this thread would have been a few pages shorter if you just started there.
That's minimum wage, not average (can't find average on wikipedia).Wait so your Internet costs 1/8th of an average persons income?
There could be better Federal and State financing to improve the backbone but it's not really corruption just prioritizing bigger blocs of people.I guess you need to be a bit more clear on that. Reading this whole thread, you sound like an ISP sympathizer. However, if your true intent is that ISPs could easily handle all the traffic if the government wasn't corrupt as fuck, well, yeah. I'm betting this thread would have been a few pages shorter if you just started there.
Well, now you sound like a sympathizer again.No, that isn't it at all.
No it doesn't, you can't even read your own article. It defines sports channel viewers as a Niche market among sports enthusiasts. ESPN the largest sports network commands a viewership of about 1% of the American population.It cites fuckingsports viewersas niche. 10% is niche. Given the total possible market for broadband, I don't see how you could possibly define specifically targeting a small subset of that population with a focused, unique product as anything but niche.
I'll just stay here thenWell, now you sound like a sympathizer again.
Why does the reduced density of the US so severely impair the US's ability to have high speed internet in very dense cities?Yes they are. But due to our reduced density most will not see much benefit, if at all
Because nobody gets government cheese to upgrade and it isn't profitable enough for a competitor to build it out with limited uptakeWhy does the reduced density of the US so severely impair the US's ability to have high speed internet in very dense cities?
Nope, that's about 800$ / month.There could be better Federal and State financing to improve the backbone but it's not really corruption just prioritizing bigger blocs of people.
Focused: Google says 540EU for the median income per capita. $1100/no or so in USD right?
Well cost of living is so variable in the US, but I think the cost/wage/restrictions/government explain all pointsNope, that's about 800$ / month.
Yeah, no corruption at all? No laws and such that prevent fair competition? Competition that would solved this infrastructure problem years ago like every other damn country did?There could be better Federal and State financing to improve the backbone but it's not really corruption just prioritizing bigger blocs of people.
If the US govt required ISPs to provide 100mbs service to cities would it be possible?Because nobody gets government cheese to upgrade and it isn't profitable enough for a competitor to build it out with limited uptake