Thanks for the advice. I think I am going to purchase a Radeon HD R9 280X. Time to give AMD a shot.
It looks like AMD has just released new Catalyst drivers that bridge the gap some, but they better whip up some drivers quick that allow the retail cards to his the same fan speeds for cooling, or people are going to be pretty pissed that they can't get the same performance that reviewers got.Plotting out average performance shows us that the press-sampled R9 290 is 23% faster than our retail card
Summary:Clock rates certainly do come closer together, though. AMD's press board has zero trouble maintaining its 947 MHz peak clock rate. Meanwhile, the retail R9 290 from Sapphire averages 904 MHz. That's not quite as good, but it beats the hell out of the 726 MHz it was averaging right out of the box and the 891 MHz it managed after we manually goosed its fan to 50% PWM.
Am I at least satisfied that whatever oversight resulted in retail cards shipping out at varying degrees of lower performance is being actively addressed by the team at AMD? Yes; now gamers are getting the performance that got them so excited when these cards first launched.
Catalyst 13.11 Beta 9.2 makes Radeon R9 290X a little louder as it adds about 100 RPM to the "Quiet" mode we originally reviewed. The difference is noticeable, but I don't think gamers lacking headphones will be perturbed by the sound. But the R9 290 was already loud. So picking up an additional 100 RPM, even after AMD cranked the PWM from 40 to 47% prior to launch, is detrimental.
The bad news is that I really couldn't imagine buying an R9 290 equipped with AMD's reference cooler, particularly in light of today's update that adds even more fan speed and noise. The good news is that I have now have higher hopes for third-party 290s. With Catalyst 13.11 Beta 9.2, our Sapphire Radeon R9 290 is just as fast as Asus' Radeon R9 290X, tested on the previous page. If we could just get our hands on more aftermarket cooling solutions, I'm pretty sure we could chip away at the most compelling reasons not to buy these boards today.
I wish I could get my wiring to be that clean looking.
I'm in the process of vetting out a new configuration since the GPU battle seems to be over (for now). $2k or under budget - I have a MicroCenter very close I could use (CPU/Motherboard bundle is $466.62 after tax for example). I have a 1900x1200 (Dell 24") monitor, so that is what I will be gaming at. I know this rig is definitely way overkill for what I'll be doing (BF4, LoL, CS:GO, very occasionally WoW, HD Movies, etc). Open to suggestions on the parts, though.
![]()
Link:Intel Core i7-4770K, EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, NZXT Phantom 530 CA-PH530-B1 Black - Jeydax-Future - jeydaxs Saved Part List - PCPartPicker
I've used the 212 EVO in a couple builds now with great results, but fair enough. The Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 looks to get high praises all around.If you're spending 2k on a computer, please get a better cooler. Take a look at Noctua or Thermalright (Choose A CPU Cooler - PCPartPicker). Everything else looks good.
PCPartPicker watches all of the sites and will alert you of the best pricing. NewEgg is obviously one of my top choices in the U.S. here.With todays new cases it's very easy to have clean looking wiring. Also check out NCIX.com or Newegg.com for pricing. Sometimes they have crazy sales.
Yup, that is my plan. I've been keeping an eye out for killer deals as the pop up.I can't really come up with anything significantly better on any of those parts for comparable prices. My only suggestion is to sit on it for 2 weeks and wait and see what kind of deals Cyber Monday brings. You might be able to knock several hundred dollars off of those parts by the end of the month.