EQ Never

Lleauaric_sl said:

They didnt show it, but the door would have been in the divot of the U-shape design, ostensibly creating a courtyard/kill zone.

Personally, Im building this.

Click to expand...

I'm building this. Done.

Doubting that EQNL will have models that can lay down face first.

Maybe a trench is more your style.

but i need to get in the prone so my paladin pirate fay can snipe people with his clockwork barret .50 me hearties

bixxby_sl said:

How do you define hard though? EQ wasn't hard because of the combat,it was 'hard' because you were fighting for limited resourcesand had to navigate not just the world but also the people in that world.

Click to expand...

so... limit... the resources

Azeth_sl said:

so... limit... the resources

Click to expand...

Sounds like denial of service to me.

Today's the last day to submit landmark questions. I have to have them in by Tomorrow afternoon, and hopefully something cool comes of them. No promises/cant talk/etc but you'll see what I'm shooting for soonish.

Big W Powah!_sl said:

Today's the last day to submit landmark questions. I have to have them in by Tomorrow afternoon, and hopefully something cool comes of them. No promises/cant talk/etc but you'll see what I'm shooting for soonish.

Click to expand...

Please add my question as to the ability to add mechanical objects into landmark. Can you make your own doors, windows, traps and the likes?

Can I build any type of wang towers, or do they need to be EQ lore specific? Like, just Erudite wang towers, Ogre wang towers, Kerran wang towers, etc, or is it fine if I build some, say, Transformer wang towers, or Drenai wang towers?

For the more advanced wang towers you need some components that you can only buy with station cash. After you cough up that entry fee, feel free to go wild!

did they ever release that combat documentary or are they still worthless?

Carl_sl said:

did they ever release that combat documentary or are they still worthless?

Click to expand...

LEt me answer this by saying they've switched directions on the info-trickle (hehe, dick trickle, immature moment) and are directing it at Landmark over EQNext. However, with landmark there will come combat, so we're still waiting.

Big W Powah!_sl said:

Today's the last day to submit landmark questions. I have to have them in by Tomorrow afternoon, and hopefully something cool comes of them. No promises/cant talk/etc but you'll see what I'm shooting for soonish.

Click to expand...

Landmark questions? Here's a couple, just the top of my head:

Will you be able to create persistent underground structures in EQNL?

Are characters in EQNL human-only, or will other races be available?

Have they figured out how to make water work in a voxel environment yet? Can we expect oceans and lakes?

Bruman_sl said:

Can I build any type of wang towers, or do they need to be EQ lore specific? Like, just Erudite wang towers, Ogre wang towers, Kerran wang towers, etc, or is it fine if I build some, say, Transformer wang towers, or Drenai wang towers?

Click to expand...

Word is that each server will have one continent where buildings have to generally conform to lore, while the other continents can be whatever the hell you want.

Ask about liquid physics and if we can make ourvolcanoserupt withwhite hotlava

Tol_sl said:

Ask about liquid physics and if we can make ourvolcanoserupt withwhite hotlava

Click to expand...

Thats all we need is cock shaped volcano called mount "Mount Dong" while it spews white hot lava when you run up the side of it.

Tol_sl said:

Ask about liquid physics and if we can make ourvolcanoserupt withwhite hotlava

Click to expand...

you should keep an eye on the voxel farm blog. liquid physics is a problem with every single voxel game and don't think we will get a solution soon.

How does the physX breakthrough with water play with vowels?

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gc3JJNj...%3Dgc3JJNjlblQ

Lleauaric_sl said:

How does the physX breakthrough with water play with vowels?

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gc3JJNj...%3Dgc3JJNjlblQ

Click to expand...

with pure consonance.

Big W Powah!_sl said:

LEt me answer this by saying they've switched directions on the info-trickle (hehe, dick trickle, immature moment) and are directing it at Landmark over EQNext. However, with landmark there will come combat, so we're still waiting.

Click to expand...

Well that's some shit right there, might as well just say they don't have jack or shit to talk about.

Carl_sl said:

Well that's some shit right there, might as well just say they don't have jack or shit to talk about.

Click to expand...

In regards to EQ:Next that has been known since August and their LIVE conference.

When Smed entered the stage and mentioned that they would have more to show at next years conference because they would have had more development time behind the game then, it was made fairly obvious that they did not have much when it came to EQN. Since then it has been 95% Landmark and the same repeating of the stuff we knew about EQN. Nothing in regards to how the combat works (from aggro, ai, mechanics) has been released as far as I know. Just what appears to be design document talk "this is what we want it to be like".

Wouldn't expect a beta for Next to happen until after SOE LIVE next year (at best) with a release perhaps Q1-Q2 2015.

EDIT: My guess. You will know more specifics and details, when it comes to gameplay mechanics, of Brads new game before you know the details and specifics of EQN.

Droigan_sl said:

My guess. You will know more specifics and details, when it comes to gameplay mechanics, of Brads new game before you know the details and specifics of EQN.

Click to expand...

More interested in that anyhow.