GoT - Is Over, Post Your Drogon Sightings

Breakdown said:

Favorite character

Can’t spell the name correctly.








Autism

Click to expand...

the conference rooms in my office are all named after GoT locations, and I internally sperge out every time I see that they mispelled Harrenhal

Breakdown said:

Favorite character

Can’t spell the name correctly.








Autism

Click to expand...

He can draw you a picture perfect replica of her tits from memory tho I bet

Soygen said:

I don't know about best in the entire series, but I really enjoyed it. This forum is where I go to remind myself that I'm not quite as miserable as I think I am.

Click to expand...

It's sloppy writing covered up by 2 episodes of reunion montages. @a_skeleton_02 post here says what I was going to say, so I'll just link it again.


To add to that, they skipped what would have been the most interesting conversation. Tyrion sits down with Bran just to talk because Tyrion is curious. There isn't any plot thread to tie up, these characters haven't interacted since Season 1. This is just what Tyrion would do when presented with this opportunity, thus the interaction feels organic instead of forced by the plot. And of course, these talentless hacks can't write that conversation so they don't show it nor reference it again.

Or Bran is hiding something(lolhe'sthenightkinglol) that someone like Tyrion would at least been able to pick up on. Even if that's a terrible plot twist, it would still require a modicum of skill to write in a believable manner. This is likely the real reason Baelish is dead, the writers couldn't write him like GRRM could, so he was crudely removed from the script.

Deathwing said:

To add to that, they skipped what would have been the most interesting conversation. Tyrion sits down with Bran just to talk because Tyrion is curious.

And of course, these talentless hacks can't write that conversation so they don't show it nor reference it again.

Click to expand...

There is absolutely no reason to show the conversation and waste screen time on it. We already know Bran's story and it wouldn't add anything.All we need to know is that now Tyrion knows the story of Bran.

If I was directing/editing this any "exchanging of stories" would be the first things you would want to cut. We already know them all.

Even in book form I'd imagine it would be very condensed and you're not going to get a full exchange. There is little to no value from it.
Only if there is some new revelation we're not privy to should we ever see the exchange, and if Tyrion does learn something, maybe we'll soon know the value of their exchange in a future episode.

Ravishing said:

There is absolutely no reason to show the conversation and waste screen time on it. We already know Bran's story and it wouldn't add anything.All we need to know is that now Tyrion knows the story of Bran.

If I was directing/editing this any "exchanging of stories" would be the first things you would want to cut. We already know them all.

Even in book form I'd imagine it would be very condensed and you're not going to get a full exchange. There is little to no value from it.
Only if there is some new revelation we're not privy to should we ever see the exchange, and if Tyrion does learn something, maybe we'll soon know the value of their exchange in a future episode.

Click to expand...

And the series of fireside chats showed what besides knighting Brienne? Those scenes are the closest these writers have come to writing organic dialogue. And it shows because those scenes have been the consensus favorite from the last episode. No lose plot threads to tie up, just some characters interacting with each other. Don't underestimate the value a "useless" conversation can add. Interesting and well written dialogue is pretty much what Tarantino is known for.

Deathwing said:

And the series of fireside chats showed what besides knighting Brienne? Those scenes are the closest these writers have come to writing organic dialogue. And it shows because those scenes have been the consensus favorite from the last episode. No lose plot threads to tie up, just some characters interacting with each other. Don't underestimate the value a "useless" conversation can add. Interesting and well written dialogue is pretty much what Tarantino is known for.

Click to expand...

Huge difference between a reunion and exchanging your entire story that the audience already knows about. All we need to know is Tyrion heard the story, we don't need to witness them telling it. Some of these reunions are brand new or have been so long since they've been together... Bran+Jaime was literally S1Ep1 and even then they never really interacted verbally.

It's a good idea to have these reunions to set where everyone currently stands with each other.

But exchanging stories is unnecessary and wouldn't develop anything "new" for the viewer. Sure, Tyrion might show certain emotions during the tale, and we , the viewers, would enjoy seeing the reactions, but there wouldn't be anything "new". Whereas reunions are, in a way, very new and setting a baseline. So during or after battle we'll get an idea where the politics might lead.

I watched Eps 1 & 2 twice each now and there is a lot to digest from it.

My takeaway is that the people disgruntled with the 1st 2 episodes only watch the show for the tits & blood. Low IQ viewers.

Ravishing said:

Huge difference between a reunion and exchanging your entire story that the audience already knows about. All we need to know is Tyrion heard the story, we don't need to witness them telling it. Some of these reunions are brand new or have been so long since they've been together... Bran+Jaime was literally S1Ep1 and even then they never really interacted verbally.

It's a good idea to have these reunions to set where everyone currently stands with each other.

But exchanging stories is unnecessary and wouldn't develop anything "new" for the viewer. Sure, Tyrion might show certain emotions during the tale, and we , the viewers, would enjoy seeing the reactions, but there wouldn't be anything "new". Whereas reunions are, in a way, very new and setting a baseline. So during or after battle we'll get an idea where the politics might lead.

I watched Eps 1 & 2 twice each now and there is a lot to digest from it.

My takeaway is that the people disgruntled with the 1st 2 episodes only watch the show for the tits & blood. Low IQ viewers.

Click to expand...

Why are you stuck on this idea that conversation between Tyrion and Bran has to contain only information the viewers have already seen?

You are simplifying far too much and glossing over mistakes and errors forced by needing to close plot threads and get characters in the right place. You may not have noticed them, but your brain did.

Deathwing said:

Why are you stuck on this idea that conversation between Tyrion and Bran has to contain only information the viewers have already seen?

You are simplifying far too much and glossing over mistakes and errors forced by needing to close plot threads and get characters in the right place. You may not have noticed them, but your brain did.

Click to expand...

Oh, I'm not stuck on the idea at all, but how do you know the conversation would be the "most interesting" if we're going to theorize possible topics. If there was something important, they would have shown it... or still may.

My interpretation of your post is you wanted to watch Bran recap his story to Tyrion.

Sure, lets start making up hypotheticals and decide if it would have been "the most interesting conversation".

If Bran proclaimed he liked it in the butt, I'm sure that would have been a very interesting discussion!

Ravishing said:

Oh, I'm not stuck on the idea at all, but how do you know the conversation would be the "most interesting" if we're going to theorize possible topics. If there was something important, they would have shown it... or still may.

My interpretation of your post is you wanted to watch Bran recap his story to Tyrion.

Sure, lets start making up hypotheticals and decide if it would have been "the most interesting conversation".

If Bran proclaimed he liked it in the butt, I'm sure that would have been a very interesting discussion!

Click to expand...

This is purposeful misinterpretation. How many times do I have to say that seeing two characters interact, especially 2 that are new to each other, has high potential to be interesting? They *could* just recap Bran's story and Quippy McMidget and High Functioning Retard could make that the highlight of the episode, *if* it was written well. Daenarys and Sansa do not have this nearly the same potential. So, I want to see the scenes that could have been interesting instead of the boring ones just to move the plot forward. Good writers do both at the same time, seamlessly, without pissing off the viewer(even if it's only subconsciously).

How are you this stupid?

Can we get back to Melisandre now? She will appear soon and confront the ice dragon, offering herself to it and then self destructing in a blinding flash of light and fire, destroying it and turning the tide.

Speaking of which, Dragonslayer (1981) is on prime and the best dragon vs wizard movie ever made.