GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 announced available May 27th

radditsu

Silver Knight of the Realm
4,676
826
seems like a good time to upgrade my 770gtx, especially if these power requirements are for real, may actually work in my SFF pc. I'm pretty retarded with this stuff in general - my OS is 32 bit( vista) - hasnt been an issue with my current card, but any reason this could effect the 1070/1080? Also side note, is it possible to upgrade to 64 bit os pretty easily/safely filewise?
For a 32 to 64 bit release you will have to reinstall., and jesus christ you need to reinstall anyway. Dont listen to anyones lies, get a cheap windows 7 key and upgrade it to 10. Privacy blah blah blah fuck it.
 

Selix

Lord Nagafen Raider
2,149
4
Is the 1080 that much more powerful then the 1070? Not sure if it's worth paying another 200-300 dollars for the difference.
 

Utnayan

I Love Utnayan he’s awesome
<Gold Donor>
16,291
12,054
Is the 1080 that much more powerful then the 1070? Not sure if it's worth paying another 200-300 dollars for the difference.
Unless you are doing 4K gaming, no. If you are 1080 or 1200, there isn't any reason to upgrade over a 970 either. At 1200p I still run everything maxed with my 2500k overclocked to 4.5 and a 770 4gb. Save Witcher 3. Which runs pretty damn close to that though without frame hitching.
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
23,481
33,794
Unless you are doing 4K gaming, no. If you are 1080 or 1200, there isn't any reason to upgrade over a 970 either. At 1200p I still run everything maxed with my 2500k overclocked to 4.5 and a 770 4gb. Save Witcher 3. Which runs pretty damn close to that though without frame hitching.
It seems everything I've read about the 1080 is that while it's an amazing card compared to older stuff, it's only the first step for 4K/VR. Seems like unless you push your system NOW (Titan X/ SLI 980TI) there's not much point to 'future proofing' when by time that becomes standard in the industry, you'll need another generation or two up from it?
 

ronne

Nǐ hǎo, yǒu jīn zi ma?
7,931
7,096
4k is still a ways off from being a steady 60fps for big AAA games, yea. 1080ti whenever that comes out seems poised to be able to hold a steady 60 on a single card, but we shall see.

4k is still very much in its infancy right now anyway so I wouldn't really touch it for another couple of years. 1440/144 is where the goodness is at right now.
 

Utnayan

I Love Utnayan he’s awesome
<Gold Donor>
16,291
12,054
It seems everything I've read about the 1080 is that while it's an amazing card compared to older stuff, it's only the first step for 4K/VR. Seems like unless you push your system NOW (Titan X/ SLI 980TI) there's not much point to 'future proofing' when by time that becomes standard in the industry, you'll need another generation or two up from it?
Yeah I would say VR is more effected by Compute. I think the major thing to remember (in my opinion) is that the majority of PC games released today are least common denominated to the Xbox One or PS4. So while we see "some" improvements on the port depending on the third party doing it, what I think we are mostly seeing is just resolution increases. For me, I run dual dell 24" 1200p displays so my 770 tackles all of it with 4gb. Until I upgrade those, or there is substantial improvement in PC development, to me it just makes sense to upgrade my PC once every six years or so. Or until something chugs. Which hasn't happened yet.
 

spronk

FPS noob
22,623
25,681
A 1070 is the sweet spot when it comes out next month, for $379 or so you will get 70% of a 1080 and a 40-50% bump over a 970 for the same price. g-Sync is the next sweet spot, it lets you run games longer without worrying about input lag and screen tearing, so while Wildlands may only run at 45 fps it will feel very close to 60 fps since you won't need to turn on vSync (more input lag) or lower features to get to 60 fps.

really though until Star Citizen I don't see anything that is going to stress out GPUs. There are zero VR games worth playing right now and it doesn't feel like that is going to change anytime soon, sadly. I haven't turned on my Oculus Rift in a week, its just a dead paperweight at this point.
 

DrLifetilt_sl

shitlord
230
1
I kinda want to wait till later in the year, see what 144Hz monitors will be available at that point (i don't have one and i want a 24" IPS one, hoping one gets released soon ), see what AMD will have to offer, also see how the various MSI/Gigabyte/EVGA implementations will be, then buying the right monitor/card combo.
 

Njals

<Bronze Donator>
823
707
Is the technology on GSync better then Freesync or is it an NVIDIA tax? The Freesync 1440p/144s seem to run about half the cost of the Gysnc versions.
 

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
37,961
14,508
Personally waiting to do the step up to the 1070 myself. The 1080 is nice for sure, but the price is absurd for someone not running VR or 4k/whatever. I just game 1080p with 144hz monitors and that's good enough for me.
 

ronne

Nǐ hǎo, yǒu jīn zi ma?
7,931
7,096
Gsync vs freesync: virtually identical technologies, gsync is just nvidia proprietary so $$. Nvidia cards also won't support freesync cause nvidia is cunts, AMD cards only, which unfortunately is pretty rough for freesync right now cause the AMD offering for high end GPUs is just objectively worse than the nvidia.
 

Leadsalad

Cis-XYite-Nationalist
5,974
11,955
G-sync has a small processing unit in the monitor as well. That's part of the up charge, extra hardware for the g sync module.
 

spronk

FPS noob
22,623
25,681
1070 benchmarks rolling out
Test NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 : Pascal pour les gamers ?

3DMark
08454586-photo-geforce-gtx-1070-3dmark.jpg


Hitman
08454600-photo-geforce-gtx-1070-hitman.jpg