Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,535
- 107,627
Im contemplating selling half the next time it touches $23 and the adding back when it dips to $21 or $20. Its setting itself up for a pretty decent swing trade.
Investing General Discussion
- Thread starter Furious
- Start date
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 44,796
- 93,652
Sold my short term AMD. Bought 90.35 sold @ 110. $6130 profit.
Its pretty obvious why people get carried away with stocks and the like. All those nice charts showing you highs and lows then you doing the math on how much you would have made if you entered at the low and sold at the high. Its like what if I held SNDL a bit longer and made 300% instead of 40% then rolled that into this AMD trade....
Its pretty obvious why people get carried away with stocks and the like. All those nice charts showing you highs and lows then you doing the math on how much you would have made if you entered at the low and sold at the high. Its like what if I held SNDL a bit longer and made 300% instead of 40% then rolled that into this AMD trade....
Last edited:
- 4
- 2
Hateyou
Not Great, Not Terrible
- 16,352
- 42,503
Why did you sell the short term instead of the long term? And you were just asking about how to lower your taxes...
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 44,796
- 93,652
Hateyou
Not Great, Not Terrible
- 16,352
- 42,503
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 44,796
- 93,652
Will certainly keep 1 when I sell.I’d sell all but 1
In retarded news;
U.S. markets regulator approves Nasdaq proposal to require corporate board diversity
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved a proposal from stock exchange operator Nasdaq Inc that requires its listed companies to have diverse boards, or explain why they do not. The proposal requires that companies have two diverse directors, including one who identifies as female...
- 2
- 2
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
Will certainly keep 1 when I sell.
In retarded news;
U.S. markets regulator approves Nasdaq proposal to require corporate board diversity
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved a proposal from stock exchange operator Nasdaq Inc that requires its listed companies to have diverse boards, or explain why they do not. The proposal requires that companies have two diverse directors, including one who identifies as female...finance.yahoo.com
I'm sure you'll get a chance to repurchase at 100. If this behaves like a normal stock.
All for diversity in Corporate settings, having worked for two Fortune 500s. I remember getting passed over by guys that weren't better than I. Eventually, I worked my way up, but it was much tougher. Now I make more in two months than those no talent fucks do all year. They only go to the finest schools and pick a certain pedigree. There's really not a 1% difference at the top.
- 1
- 1
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,535
- 107,627
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
When I got my MBA from Texas, literally there was no difference between any of us, except the Engineers you knew were going to not do so well. Because they only saw life in terms of numbers and didn't understand people. People moved from all over the world to be there, and there wasn't much difference in intelligence, just creativity.
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,535
- 107,627
If you don't mind me asking where did you go for your MBA? I did mine at UTPB.
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
Time to buy the airlines?
www.cnbc.com
Airline stocks are close to 'max fear' — and it could be the best time to buy, trader says
For airline stocks, sentiment matters more than technical levels, says JC O'Hara of MKM Partners.
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
University of Texas at Austin. Like anyone gives a shit in the real world, right?
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,535
- 107,627
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
I paid the full boat and got a full time degree. My company marked me as essential, so they paid 100% at the start...and kept paying less and less. But I did get a full time degree, in class degree.
Mist
Eeyore Enthusiast
- 30,478
- 22,327
Will PLTR ever make a product that you or I use every day, or that advertisers buy ads on every day?
No.
It's not going to be the next GOOG. The total addressable market for its products are ultimately quite small.
- 1
Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 790
Going through my trades. I made $4,005 last week (Mon 253, Tues 0, Wed 2533, Thurs 475 and Fri 744). On Monday, when I wasn't feeling well from the covid shot, I lost 1,200 in 30 minutes of trading, and I have no idea why I made those trades. They were garbage, I wasn't feeling right. Wednesday, I made 0 because I held overnight. I traded the last hour after being up, and lost almost 1k getting my face melted. I shorted and it ripped the other way. I bought and it immediately reversed. I know better. I should have left in the first hour. Thursday, I lost 600 to macroing at the open.
Factor out those areas, and it would have been a 7k week.
Also, like Blazin said, earlier in the week, I wasn't programming enough profit in my trades. When he said to review my trades to see what happened after, literally, I could've doubled my profits on 80% of my trades.
Friday, all trades were perfect, and I made 744 in less than one hour. I get the mentality that I need to stay all day, and thats not good. I think if I can make 744 in an hour, I can make 5-6k all day. That's when I start losing trades. The trading gets choppy at lunch (algorithms) or I try to try in power hour and get my face melted. If I'm on past 10:30 my time, I usually start losing trades. 8:45 to 10:30 is my sweet spot.
I feel like a pussy for leaving in 50 minutes on Friday. Because I want to dominate the stock all day. And then I realize that nothing I said in the last two sentences makes any sense for traders. It's not a fight, but I have this feeling like I walked away from one. This line of thinking is not right for trading.
Factor out those areas, and it would have been a 7k week.
Also, like Blazin said, earlier in the week, I wasn't programming enough profit in my trades. When he said to review my trades to see what happened after, literally, I could've doubled my profits on 80% of my trades.
Friday, all trades were perfect, and I made 744 in less than one hour. I get the mentality that I need to stay all day, and thats not good. I think if I can make 744 in an hour, I can make 5-6k all day. That's when I start losing trades. The trading gets choppy at lunch (algorithms) or I try to try in power hour and get my face melted. If I'm on past 10:30 my time, I usually start losing trades. 8:45 to 10:30 is my sweet spot.
I feel like a pussy for leaving in 50 minutes on Friday. Because I want to dominate the stock all day. And then I realize that nothing I said in the last two sentences makes any sense for traders. It's not a fight, but I have this feeling like I walked away from one. This line of thinking is not right for trading.
Last edited:
- 1
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,535
- 107,627
You are thinking to narrow. They dont have to "create it". They can buy it. GOOG didn't create YouTube, the bought it. FB didn't invent IG, they bought it. Look sometimes at the ginormous list of companies MSFT has acquired over the years. Its mind numbing. PLTR has been PIPE investing in lots of SPACs for this very purpose and getitng them on the cheap by doing the PIPE. PLTR has a steady revenue stream that aint going away (the gubmint) because no one else can offer what they offer. They can use this revenue stream to acquire other revenue streams. I am up more than 100% in less than a year. I am ok waiting a few years to see this move.
Jysin
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 6,278
- 4,034
Step ahead of you on this.Time to buy the airlines?
Airline stocks are close to 'max fear' — and it could be the best time to buy, trader says
For airline stocks, sentiment matters more than technical levels, says JC O'Hara of MKM Partners.