I mean, it isn't like Airbus is completely incident free either.
Sure, but they've also produced around 6,000 more commercial aircraft than Airbus. That's over a 1/3 of the entirety of Airbus' production since '74.Likely not even close to the amount of incidents boeing has had.
If you are flying you have two choices. This isn't like there are a dozen manufacturers and we are discussing only two of them. In a universe of two, go with the one with significantly less planes falling out of the sky. It's doesn't matter if Airbus is not "squeaky clean". Their planes fall out of the sky at a significantly lower rate than BA.Sure, but they've also produced around 6,000 more commercial aircraft than Airbus. That's over a 1/3 of the entirety of Airbus' production since '74.
I'm not arguing that Boeing is without issues, but people like to pretend that Airbus is squeaky clean.
Citation needed. I would be amazed if the difference was even statistically significant given how extremely rare these events are.If you are flying you have two choices. This isn't like there are a dozen manufacturers and we are discussing only two of them. In a universe of two, go with the one with significantly less planes falling out of the sky. It's doesn't matter if Airbus is not "squeaky clean". Their planes fall out of the sky at a significantly lower rate than BA.
Who cares about lifetime comparisons. What's the safety difference since dei cock sucking startedIs that all mechanical/software failure though? Pilot error, weather, etc would be good to see
After finding out that Boeing cuts corners on maintenance and practices DEI, I will never fly them again.
Read those incidents, they sound like something you'd expect on an airline called "Ghetto Airlines"
I flew on a commercial flight during that time period. In the 70s and 80s there were still a number of commercial planes that were once military. Not everything then was Boeing or Airbus. One flight I took the back end opened up and a ramp came down which obviously was used for moving things in the military. You walked up and took a seat, any seat and off you went. I once took a short commercial flight with Royal Airlines and the plane had about 20 people on board. It was a gulfstream turbo prop. Same gulfstream I think that got into business jets eventually. Now everything is 737 sized and up for commercial non private stuff, or so it seems.
I’ve flown a number of ATR 72s in SE Asia and Africa. Not super long distance flights. They seem to be popular in these regions for 1-3 hour flights.Likely a 727 with the Airstair, these were in quite broad use for a while. Your other assessment is correct, turboprop aircraft have mostly disappeared from passenger service as cost optimization (and regulation) has led design towards the twin jet configuration. Tri-jets like the 727 and DC10/MD11 have been gone from passenger service for over a decade. Even the classic 747 has almost completely disappeared from passenger service (no US airlines operate them anymore). It's a fairly bland landscape these days, you have to start looking at things like window shapes to even tell them apart.
View attachment 590594
I’ve flown a number of ATR 72s in SE Asia and Africa. Not super long distance flights. They seem to be popular in these regions for 1-3 hour flights.
interesting - apparently ATR shares tech with airbus. Airbus owns a 50% stake in them