Investing General Discussion

Sanrith Descartes

I was forced to self-deport from the /pol thread
<Gold Donor>
49,338
134,097
I had a job doing a complete reorg of a pretty big company. I studied all the business units, all the jobs, all the RE holdings...basically everything. This company operated out of two huge main buildings and a large number of off-site essentially zombie real estate holdings. The company was so large it had an on-site motorpool and full time pilots. Different types of union jobs in departments that could do anything. It was more or less a small, self-contained city. The company even had its own track rigs and helicopters. Triple digit # of employees at its peak.

It was purchased by another company whose CEO wanted to make it larger. A new company came along with a fraction of employees and no legacy costs and murdered them.

The result? The old company is entirely GONE. The buildings are empty, and they even sold every inch of copper in that place. All those high paying union jobs are gone. Almost ALL the jobs are gone, and all that is left is a few people in a tiny strip office handling paperwork for outsourcing for the out of state main business. Further, most of those jobs weren't replaced with new outsourced jobs, they were replaced with nothing.

At one point, most of these people were useful to the organization. At the drop of a hat, they weren't. I used to live in a tech hub that had a similar story. Hundreds of giant empty buildings that were once full of well paid people. All those jobs now forever gone to China and India.

Hell, I grew up in a boom town. Once businesses started to unwind and downsize, they all did. Boom turned to permanent bust. All those jobs back into the ether from whence they came.
We have somehow lost sight of running businesses lean and efficiently. Its all bloat and costs just get passed on to the consumer. Its not their money, they don't care about the shareholders, they care about everything but. Small businesses, where the owner is having to make payroll out of his own pocket during a dry spell, understand what it means to question every dollar of cost. Well, the successful ones do.
 

Sanrith Descartes

I was forced to self-deport from the /pol thread
<Gold Donor>
49,338
134,097
Just don't even buy insurance. The best thing Trump did was remove that fucking ludicrous penalty for abstaining from all this. You even alluded to being able to negotiate on your own behalf without insurance.

That's actually the best way to fix all this shit. Maybe even the only way. Old school collective bargaining.
If I were younger I would definitely self insure. I am old enough that I have to look at the percentages. A free bronze plan (after ACA credit), gives me a $9k out of pocket max on a catastrophic hospital stay. For free, why would I not take it and the free cap.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,575
37,774
100% agree with you but a couple things I will add. The fearmongering on social media about rate hikes is insane. The numbers they are posting are bullshit. I got my quotes and with the premium tax credit it went up about $150 a month. So yeah it sucks, but its not earth shattering. The other thing I will add is self employed people who get these credits are quite experienced in manipulating their self employed income to take full advantage of the credits. So yes there will be some folks who get raped, but it wont be the large percentage of people the fear mongers are posting about.

Anecdotal observation: I had my annual physical this month and asked the office what my bill would have been if I had no insurance. $120 for the visit and $125 for the full bloodwork. Honestly not bad all things being equal for a once a year type of thing. The vast majority of Americans without health issues and between 20 and 40 should be using high deductible plans. They should be carrying catastrophic health care insurance to cover hospital stays and shit like that. Better to go out of pocket $500 or even 1k a year as needed than be paying 10k a year in premiums out of their paychecks. Having young kids is a different factor and honestly they should be able to get a policy just to cover the young child since the odds are higher of something happening.
Our family plan is just a hair under $30,000/yr and that is with ever climbing deductibles.
 
  • 1Mother of God
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
20,895
17,778
This post made me laugh a bit to myself. I've mentioned before I had the bullshit jobs conversation with my coworkers probably 7 or 8 years ago now. Since it was F/A-18, which meant lots of engineers and mathematicians and shit as a make work program, my solution was that we could retool the entire organization for space exploration.

Granted, that's a fringe case of an organization made up of people suited for that mission. I don't know what you do with healthcare or university bureaucrats.

But surely we can come up with someone more productive than infinity HR jobs.
I've had almost the exact same conversation. I remember talking about "bullshit jobs" with a Sr. Director of Operations at Walmart 6 or so years ago, and the F/A-18 example hits perfectly. When your org is stacked with engineers, mathematicians, and systems people, you can at least imagine retooling the whole machine into something productive. Space exploration, defense R&D, infrastructure, whatever. It's a fringe case, but the talent is aligned with missions that actually build something.

But like you said… what do you do with the sectors where the bloat isn't technically skilled people? What's the productive redeployment path for healthcare billing administrators, university bureaucrats, DEI coordinators, HR armies, compliance layers, and the whole metastasized ecosystem of middlemen that exists because paperwork now has paperwork? You can't exactly pivot fifty thousand redundant hospital administrators into orbital mechanics.

And that's the core problem: HR-style roles multiply infinitely because they have no natural ceiling. There's always a new workflow to oversee, a new process to "own," a new form to manage, a new reporting structure to justify another layer of oversight. It's organizational mitosis. Cells just keep dividing because that's what they do.

It's pretty easy to imagine transforming a room full of aerospace engineers into a Mars program. It's a lot harder to imagine transforming a room full of university assistant-to-associate-deputy-vice-coordinators into anything that produces measurable output.

Ideally, we can find something more productive than infinite HR jobs. But the real issue is that we built whole sectors where the work exists purely because the system created the need for itself. Then there's the fact that technology simply eliminated the real "need" for millions of these types of jobs. And unwinding that without detonating the labor market is the part nobody wants to talk about. But that unwinding is coming in the form of "AI". And now what do you do with a labor market where you have 10+% unemployment and literally no jobs for those people to fill? Should be spicy.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Sanrith Descartes

I was forced to self-deport from the /pol thread
<Gold Donor>
49,338
134,097
I've had almost the exact same conversation. I remember talking about "bullshit jobs" with a Sr. Director of Operations at Walmart 6 or so years ago, and the F/A-18 example hits perfectly. When your org is stacked with engineers, mathematicians, and systems people, you can at least imagine retooling the whole machine into something productive. Space exploration, defense R&D, infrastructure, whatever. It's a fringe case, but the talent is aligned with missions that actually build something.

But like you said… what do you do with the sectors where the bloat isn't technically skilled people? What's the productive redeployment path for healthcare billing administrators, university bureaucrats, DEI coordinators, HR armies, compliance layers, and the whole metastasized ecosystem of middlemen that exists because paperwork now has paperwork? You can't exactly pivot fifty thousand redundant hospital administrators into orbital mechanics.

And that's the core problem: HR-style roles multiply infinitely because they have no natural ceiling. There's always a new workflow to oversee, a new process to "own," a new form to manage, a new reporting structure to justify another layer of oversight. It's organizational mitosis. Cells just keep dividing because that's what they do.

It's pretty easy to imagine transforming a room full of aerospace engineers into a Mars program. It's a lot harder to imagine transforming a room full of university assistant-to-associate-deputy-vice-coordinators into anything that produces measurable output.

Ideally, we can find something more productive than infinite HR jobs. But the real issue is that we built whole sectors where the work exists purely because the system created the need for itself. Then there's the fact that technology simply eliminated the real "need" for millions of these types of jobs. And unwinding that without detonating the labor market is the part nobody wants to talk about. But that unwinding is coming in the form of "AI". And now what do you do with a labor market where you have 10+% unemployment and literally no jobs for those people to fill? Should be spicy.
True story. Before divestiture, AT&T (Ma Bell) was a government approved monopoly and operated on what we called rate of return profits. State Public Service Commissions would set max profit percentages (lets say 8%). Any profit in excess of that 8% each year had to be returned to the citizens as rebates. AT&T didn't believe in giving money back so they created so many bullshit jobs as they could to keep the money. We had employees in some facilities whose entire job was to get up once an hour and clean out the ashtrays throughout the buildings.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
9,332
32,843
100% agree with you but a couple things I will add. The fearmongering on social media about rate hikes is insane. The numbers they are posting are bullshit. I got my quotes and with the premium tax credit it went up about $150 a month. So yeah it sucks, but its not earth shattering. The other thing I will add is self employed people who get these credits are quite experienced in manipulating their self employed income to take full advantage of the credits. So yes there will be some folks who get raped, but it wont be the large percentage of people the fear mongers are posting about.

Anecdotal observation: I had my annual physical this month and asked the office what my bill would have been if I had no insurance. $120 for the visit and $125 for the full bloodwork. Honestly not bad all things being equal for a once a year type of thing. The vast majority of Americans without health issues and between 20 and 40 should be using high deductible plans. They should be carrying catastrophic health care insurance to cover hospital stays and shit like that. Better to go out of pocket $500 or even 1k a year as needed than be paying 10k a year in premiums out of their paychecks. Having young kids is a different factor and honestly they should be able to get a policy just to cover the young child since the odds are higher of something happening.
I pay out of pocket. Thursday I went for my yearly bloodwork - $200. Been dealing with high cholesterol for awhile so they referred me to do a calcium CT scan. That cost me $99. Years scrip worth of rosuvastatin will cost me another $100. I will do a follow up bloodtest in a few months to see how effective the statin is at getting my LDL down, but other than that, my healthcare is done for the year unless I stroke out or have a heart attack and the calcium score should give me an idea whether or not I need to be concerned with that.

If a man just takes charge of his own healthcare and he doesnt have a bunch of chronic shit to deal with then there's no reason to let the system bleed you dry.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
20,895
17,778
True story. Before divestiture, AT&T (Ma Bell) was a government approved monopoly and operated on what we called rate of return profits. State Public Service Commissions would set max profit percentages (lets say 8%). Any profit in excess of that 8% each year had to be returned to the citizens as rebates. AT&T didn't believe in giving money back so they created so many bullshit jobs as they could to keep the money. We had employees in some facilities whose entire job was to get up once an hour and clean out the ashtrays throughout the buildings.
That's a good example, and honestly one of the clearest real-world illustrations of how "make-work" economies form. Ma Bell basically weaponized job creation as a way to avoid giving money back, because under rate-of-return regulation the worst thing a monopoly could do was be too efficient. If you crossed the profit ceiling, the state made you rebate it, so the logical move was to hire more people to absorb the excess. It's almost comical in hindsight. You were incentivized to manufacture work until your efficiency dropped back to the regulated profit margin.

And you end up with exactly what you described. Where you have entire buildings staffed with people whose job was literally to walk around once an hour and empty ashtrays. Not because the company needed it, but because the regulatory structure required inefficiency. It's the "bullshit-jobs" theory decades before Graeber put a name to it.

The wild part is how much of corporate America still runs on a softer version of that logic. Not through profit caps, but through perverse incentives - budgets that must be spent or they shrink next year, departments that justify existence through headcount, managers evaluated by the number of people under them, bureaucracies that treat "more process" as success, etc.

You end up with this slow, creeping institutional fattening where the goal isn't productivity, it's avoiding the consequences of being too productive. AT&T ashtray-emptiers sound absurd now, but zoom out and you realize the same thing happens everywhere, just with more modern job titles: "Process Excellence Coordinator." "Engagement Optimization Lead." "Workforce Harmonization Specialist." (aka: guy who used to empty the ashtrays.).

Your story is a perfect microcosm of how the system reinforces itself. When efficiency isn't rewarded and you need pseudo jobs programs to prop up the economy, bloat becomes the rational choice.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Jysin

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
7,142
5,627
Jesus fucking Christ. I’m moving the family stateside next year and the cost of healthcare is insane. I could get a top tier Cigna UK private plan for me, wife and kid for under $5k USD. Zero deductibles, the works.

$30k+ in the US? What in the actual fuck?
 

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
29,911
68,581
Saw a story that Trump is preparing a bill to extend the ACA subsidies again for 2 years. This is essentially exactly what the democrats wanted to stop the shutdown.

Someone make it make sense…
 

dragonbr

Trakanon Raider
76
76
Saw a story that Trump is preparing a bill to extend the ACA subsidies again for 2 years. This is essentially exactly what the democrats wanted to stop the shutdown.

Someone make it make sense…
He taco'd on not giving into the subsidies and then taco'd again minutes before they were set to announce it due "pressure from congress"

So many 🌮s
 

Jysin

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
7,142
5,627
Double decker taco!!

taco GIF by Shaking Food GIFs