Tbo i dont know. Logging costs for dns query but it isnt that high.Am I misunderstanding then? It's not actively scanning, but passively logging and still requiring the use of an AWS service to function?
I know the reason for this is strings from our equity partner.
Why is this a software engineers problem thoughDumbass security team ran some DNS scanning shit across our entire AWS infrastructure. Normally I would not care about this but they ran up ~$8k in our AWS account on Route 53 (Gay AWS Feature ) for the past 3 months. I am pretty dialed on on our services in AWS which run in total about $5k a month. Which I think is pretty good overall and my team's overall spend per month is like ~$35k/month on various services.
I don't really know what they're doing but they apparently have been running similar costs per month in EVERY SINGLE ONE of our 50-60 AWS accounts. A lot more for the ones that support the commercial product. But they are being super faggots about cost attribution which is my primary concern. The bean counters are pretty sensitive to huge increases in team spend, at least my team's, and now security wont accept that any of these should be attributed to their team despite them being the ones doing it.
I imagine the bean counters are going to get on their case pretty bad when they realize InfoSec is running up at minimum $400k a month "scanning." It's all fallen into the various teams that own the AWS accounts because none of them actually belong to InfoSec so they inadvertently shielded themselves from scrutiny.
Because our team owns that AWS account. There is no hard restriction on me firing up any AWS service to solve a software engineering problem. This account has a number of servers and other things that run all of our code doing various things.Why is this a software engineers problem though
Out of curiosity, did you ask them for specifics on *how* they expect you to do this AI nonsense?Here's a new one for ya.
One of my offboarding tasks is to setup an AI Agent version of myself for the org. What does this mean? I have absolutely no idea. Best I can figure just keep writing documentation like you would normally do on the way out and spend time writing down all of the institutional knowledge I can remember and feed it to the Agent. Then hope for the best.
The future is wild. I suspect y'all should get used to this.
That has always been the case when they ask you to integrate AI into your daily tasks.That illustrates pretty well why I want to get out of this industry. The idea that all of your knowledge, experience and skills can be input into an AI agent and it will be like a clone of you. And it can be done as an offboarding task!
It doesn't matter that it's not possible, the idea itself is laughable, and the people asking are delusional. People, in general, honestly think we are that easily replaceable. Soon it won't even be an ask as an offboarding task, they'll just blatantly ask people to try and create AI versions of themselves so they can be laid off.
This isn't necessarily an issue exclusive to software development. It's just more prevalent.
I'm already very tired of listening to people say things like "My nephew used AI to create an App on the Google Play store and it's already made $2k in 3 months!" and having them genuinely think that means that anyone can be a software developer and create enterprise level applications by just asking AI to "code".
That has always been the case when they ask you to integrate AI into your daily tasks.
Always assume the worst when it comes to corporations. You will usually be right and only be scratching the surface of the horrible shit they are doing. They are entities literally born to service the infinite depths of human greed and depravity.I guess technically that's true if the end goal is automation (and the end goal is probably automation). But to actually ask a person outright to create an "AI clone" of themselves is pretty blatant. If it wasn't so depressing it would be comical.