Thinking about it more I would think that they are smart enough to at least go through the motions to give the appearance that everything was weighted in deliberations. They damn well know the shit storm that this case has caused and wouldn't do themselves any favors in the court of public opinion by reaching a verdict faster then ordering a pizza.
Is that why there is such irrational support of guns and the actions of people who carry guns here?
Have you read that thread and this thread or are you doing your normal shtick? Gun supporters here have allowed their personal feelings cloud their judgment on this case and the right of someone to stalk another given a tenuous claim to authority.
No. It's just an observation I made based on how some people post and the language that they use.
See, if you call it stalking that it makes it sound like a crime except it wasn't stalking. Trayvon got followed, got to his father's place, thought about what had happened, and went back to kick the shit out of Zimmerman. Following Trayvon wasn't a crime. Verbally confronting Trayvon wasn't a crime. We've got plenty of testimony on that.
Next they're gonna ask the judge if it's possible to find the prosecution guilty of something
The stalking/following led to the crime of either second degree murder or manslaughter. That Miami-Herald op-ed was great and an example of how things will slowly move if Zimmerman gets off.
Yeah. Agree 100% It's what I'd do anyway. The victim deserves our full due diligence.
One of the criminal trials I did where the prosecutor was hilariously bad and the cops were hopelessly inept and we got an acquittal in ~15 minutes of deliberations, when we went to talk to the jury they were actually quite upset at the judge and prosecutor asking them why this case came to trial and why they would waste everyone's time bringing a case like this. They shit talked the prosecutor and she just walked out, judge tried to explain that he has no control over the cases that are brought, etc...
