Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,860
8,266
Whoa... I didn't realize you could post in this forum without being RRPed. Mind = blown.

Mind you, I'm gonna have to do something so I get shawed at least once so I can post here legit.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Bro, figure out what you are hating on here - Kim Jong Un or water parks and then get back to us
Well I don't hate water parks in general, but this particular one doesn't look all that appealing.

Its like they said "Okay, the West has water parks, so we're going to jam every feature of every major water park in the West into our one water park. That'll show those bastards!"

Plus the Kim Jong Il statue is freaky.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,141
172,384
I dont know, that water park looks pretty nice to me.

Certainly as nice as any water park I've seen.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,141
172,384
Whoa... I didn't realize you could post in this forum without being RRPed. Mind = blown.

Mind you, I'm gonna have to do something so I get shawed at least once so I can post here legit.
Calling Sean fat and a welfare moocher is pretty much a guaranteed RRP.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
Weber's and critical theory's criticism of scientism has nothing to do with ideological thinking - in fact it's the complete opposite: to rid oneself of scientistic ideology and flawed methodology. I, or he, is not trapped in an 'ideological class conflict mode of thought'. Weber wasn't a fan of Marx. I've never gave my opinion of anything in this thread yet. I leveled on you an a necessary condition, per Marx, that any communistic society would need to meet. You're now linking me a bunch of feminists for some reason. Are we getting the monkey love video next? That one was better. Or why don't you link Harvey, who you've consistently ignored? Maybe he's just not authoritative enough, but some random feminist on youtube is, clearly.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Weber's and critical theory's criticism of scientism has nothing to do with ideological thinking - in fact it's the complete opposite: to rid oneself of scientistic ideology and flawed methodology. I, or he, is not trapped in an 'ideological class conflict mode of thought'. Weber wasn't a fan of Marx. I've never gave my opinion of anything in this thread yet. I leveled on you an a necessary condition, per Marx, that any communistic society would need to meet. You're now linking me a bunch of feminists for some reason. Are we getting the monkey love video next? That one was better. Or why don't you link Harvey, who you've consistently ignored? Maybe he's just not authoritative enough, but some random feminist on youtube is, clearly.
That woman wasn't a feminist.

She's the opposite, actually. You should watch that video, but since it completely exposes your methodology for the simplistic childish binary process it actually is, you'll have to avoid it like you avoid facts regarding every single major communist world power that has arisen in the past 200 years.

And you clearly are trapped in an ideological class conflict mode of thought, hence why you think football brainwashes people with the evil power of capitalism, reducing them to zombies.

Your binary master/slave relationship world view is cancer.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
That woman wasn't a feminist.

She's the opposite, actually. You should watch that video, but since it completely exposes your methodology for the simplistic childish binary process it actually is, you'll have to avoid it like you avoid facts regarding every single major communist world power that has arisen in the past 200 years.

And you clearly are trapped in an ideological class conflict mode of thought, hence why you think football brainwashes people with the evil power of capitalism, reducing them to zombies.

Your binary master/slave relationship world view is cancer.
Who is he, what is her authority on the subject? After you tell me, I'll link you again Harvey's credentials, and we can compare. How about that?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Who is he, what is her authority on the subject? After you tell me, I'll link you again Harvey's credentials, and we can compare. How about that?
I'm not appealing to her authority, claiming that when I quote her, the conversation is over, the experts have spoken.

Might want to cry a little harder.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
I'll go first.

David Harvey [...] is the Distinguished Professor of Anthropology and Geography at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY). A leading social theorist of international standing, he received his PhD in Geography from the University of Cambridge in 1961. Widely influential, he is among the top 20 most cited authors in the humanities.[1] In addition, he is the world's most cited academic geographer [...] In 2007, Harvey was listed as the 18th most-cited intellectual of all time in the humanities and social sciences by The Times Higher Education Guide.[5]
And again, the class I enrolled in you in. He said you never showed up:

Reading Marx's Capital with David Harvey
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
EXCELLENT POINT

Why should we consider anything she says?
You can accept it or reject it, it really isn't relevant to me whether you accept it or reject it, honestly.

In fact I expect that because what she's saying is so salient, and so damning, of people like Dumar's world view, their only option will be to ignore it completely.

Much like they do all the evidence that major Communist leaders like Mao were, in fact, communist and attempting to formulate a society consistent with Marx's idealized model.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,141
172,384
You can accept it or reject it, it really isn't relevant to me whether you accept it or reject it, honestly.

In fact I expect that because what she's saying is so salient, and so damning, of people like Dumar's world view, their only option will be to ignore it completely.

Much like they do all the evidence that major Communist leaders like Mao were, in fact, communist and attempting to formulate a society consistent with Marx's idealized model.
You mean salient like the lady that wrote that book on kentucky?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.