Don't worry, when DARPA first did theunmanned vehicle grand challenge, a 150 mile race through the desert, the best entry went 7 miles, then stuck itself on a rock and spun the wheels until they caught fire. That was the BEST entry. A bunch failed at the starting line.DOD announced today a competition to build Skynet
DARPA Issues $2mil Cyber Grand Challenge - Slashdot
Nah miks just a salty crybaby who can't stand having anyone challenge him so I do so for the lulz. For a guy who thinks he's literally the smartest man on earth, mik sure can't stand when he's proven wrong. He goes tsar bomba and it's hilariousSometimes I wonder if Mikhail and Hodj are two cleverly written chatbots, programmed to discuss obscure topics and hate each other. It's hard to believe two normally functioning humans could produce that much text that fast and that angrily about goofy topics. They also seem to argue at each other rather than with each other. Flaw in the AI, I guess. v2.0 will fix it.
Also, does that mean Skynet is about to curbstomp humanity? Or do we still have time?
I've said all week I've had two exams this week bro, dunno what to tell ya, my ocher exams are at 1230 on Thursdays during class. Then I have recitation after, which is where I am now on the iPad.Ever notice that every time Hodj is getting clobbered that he has to go to class or go take an exam?
I see what you did there. And lol'd.He goestsar bombaand it's hilarious
Wait, to be completely honest I skipped a lot of posts between Dumar, hodj and mik, dumar said you essentially cant think rationally, and use evidence when thinking about certain topics. Jesus titty fucking Christ.Dumar, you have said several times that we can't think about these topics through the scientific process. Why is that? If your theories can't be tested and can't be proven (assuming this is the case), then why should we accept them as face value?
If Marx says that capitalism inevitably goes to communism, great. Other people disagree. Why are his views so great?
I think you should stop making up stories and exams to avoid MikI've said all week I've had two exams this week bro, dunno what to tell ya, my ocher exams are at 1230 on Thursdays during class. Then I have recitation after, which is where I am now on the iPad.
Also I just kicked that exams ass. Mostly over stereochemistry, enantiomers, chirality, energy diagrams, etc.
Should I skip exams to argue in circles with mik while he's frothing at the mouth because he can't read plain English? Seems like a bad idea.
Dumar thinks basing decisions on evidence and facts rather than theory and presumption is employing reductionism bro.Wait, to be completely honest I skipped a lot of posts between Dumar, hodj and mik, dumar said you essentially cant think rationally, and use evidence when thinking about certain topics. Jesus titty fucking Christ.
Dumar and mik, stop worshipping Marx. He was a hack.
I can make up a syllabus in MS Word too, broWhen I get home Ill show you the exam dates from the syllabus bro.
It's funny that you mention plain English given that you don't know what anecdotes are.I've said all week I've had two exams this week bro, dunno what to tell ya, my ocher exams are at 1230 on Thursdays during class. Then I have recitation after, which is where I am now on the iPad.
Also I just kicked that exams ass. Mostly over stereochemistry, enantiomers, chirality, energy diagrams, etc.
Should I skip exams to argue in circles with mik while he's frothing at the mouth because he can't read plain English? Seems like a bad idea.
There's no way to apply scientific rigor to any kind of social or political systems on a large scale. The only thing you can do is examine the trends, look for whatever paired examples you can find (and they're not going to be well paired) and see where they lead. In general, soft sciences aren't science for the vast majority of claims that might actually be useful in the real world.Dumar, you have said several times that we can't think about these topics through the scientific process. Why is that? If your theories can't be tested and can't be proven (assuming this is the case), then why should we accept them as face value?
lolHow are those excel macros coming along Mik?