Lets face it, you believe int some sort of quasi social and moral anarchy, stuffed into a tortilla of communism. I do not."Might makes right" doesn't work any better as "majority makes right."
It's not a given (at least with me) that those things ought to be criminalized either (pretty much for the same lack-of-demonstrable-harm reasons).
Because the law doesn't exist to protect you from inconvenience or offense.But also why should I be inconvenienced and offended by a tiny minority who wants to invade my neighborhood while I know that the vast majority of my neighbors share my views?
Really?Because the law doesn't exist to protect you from inconvenience or offense.
Sorry I got under your skin so much bro, no need to get all personal and shit yo. The internet's really not serious business, despite what you may have heard.My ass of course.
Hodj do me a favor, ask a professor why in gods name in this day in age a fuck stick would want an rt qpcr assay developed on a standard block with a 3hour cycling conditions. This board isn't entertaining enough for the amount of downtime I have optimizing this piece of shit.Friends, the true enemy here is Tanoomba. Let us not forget this.
The difference is that I can tell you WHY I believe those things. You may not agree with my reasons, but there's (at least) an attempt at justification.Lets face it, you believe int some sort of quasi social and moral anarchy, stuffed into a tortilla of communism. I do not.
I was actually pretty reticent to enter the debate at all precisely because I didn't want to argue with you about it and you seemed more focused on the Russian law anyway (something I don't know enough details about to really comment).Why did I even bother arguing with you
See my previous and bow post to see how bored I am. I respect you for going back and getting a degree like you are brah.Sorry I got under your skin so much bro, no need to get all personal and shit yo. The internet's really not serious business, despite what you may have heard.
But for the record I just turned 40 and yes I am wrapping up my BS this year and will start my masters next year. I'm a loser!
It was for science to see if one could really die from a 30man bukkake.Gross.
I already told you all a million times why I believe in it. I think its a social deviancy, I dont think its normal.The difference is that I can tell you WHY I believe those things. You may not agree with my reasons, but there's (at least) an attempt at justification.
I was actually pretty reticent to enter the debate at all precisely because I didn't want to argue with you about it and you seemed more focused on the Russian law anyway (something I don't know enough details about to really comment).
It was nice. The cake was not shaped like a giant phallus and the groom and the groom did not cartwheel into the reception buck naked waving rainbow flagsGross.
1. Homosexuality is a social deviancy.I already told you all a million times why I believe in it. I think its a social deviancy, I dont think its normal.
Now THAT would be a demonstrable harm.It was for science to see if one could really die from a 30man bukkake.
oh my god.How will societal norms stop this guy from walking down my street in front of my kids? How will free market and capitalism help me there?
![]()
yeah. lets just all do whatever we want in public, piss on sidewalks, swear at strangers, shit in the street, masturbate in restaurants, sit naked in the movie theater next to other people, fuck on buses, litter in the streets. Free country, freedom of speech, no oppression by majority, ATTICA!! ATTICA!! amirite?1. Homosexuality is a social deviancy.
2. ???
3. Homosexual behavior of all kinds should be prohibited from public spaces.
The only thing that allows 3 to follow is "2. All forms of social deviancy should be prohibited from public spaces." But that's completely begging the question. Why should social deviancy be prohibited from public spaces? You say you've said why you believe it, but the links are only there for people who already agree with you.