Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
TheBeagle_sl said:
Why are so you being so dense? GOVERNMENT censorship of non snuff porn is UNNECESSARY. As soon as NBC shows a couple dudes blowing each other in prime time, they lose every single sponsor, 100% of their ad revenue, and 90% of their viewership and promptly leave the airwaves because they are bankrupt. No unnecessary laws need be enacted to make that happen.
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't they just adapt and pick up sponsors that would not Lind being associated with this such as dildo companies?
 
M

Mikhail Bakunin_sl

shitlord
2,199
1
Araysar_sl said:
Violence is the continuation of policy by other means. If they dont want to agree to the compromise that is being generously offered to them by the community at large, then prepare to have your skulls bashed into the cobblestones of Red Square
Click to expand...
And if they had the power to bash the skulls of the "generous" community at large, what argument would you make to them for why they shouldn't and why they should accept those terms?
 
M

Mikhail Bakunin_sl

shitlord
2,199
1
Araysar_sl said:
Every compromise or agreement is held in place by the threat of legal action and finally violence. How the fuck do you think ANYTHING gets enforced in any country?
Click to expand...
Right. That use of violence means that laws have to be justified. Otherwise violent revolt is what's justified. I'm asking what your justification is (apart from "we're the majority and we can force you to comply").
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,183
172,411
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
And if they had the power to bash the skulls of the "generous" community at large, what argument would you make to them for why they shouldn't and why they should accept those terms?
Click to expand...
If they had the power to do so, well then they would be the majority and 90% of the country would be butt pumping each others anal crevices, no? And the gay lifestyle would be the established community standard.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
I think there's good experimental evidence actually, but I'm not going to talk to you about this right now. If you're interested you can look up information about Catalonia during the Spanish civil war or the Free Territory during the Ukrainian revolution.
Click to expand...
So zero evidence it works better than kther methoda on a large, national scale.

You know deep down right now in human history it isn't feasible. I concede to you that in the future it may be and that point it may be optimal, but that will only be achieved through the progress of other governance philosophies.
 
M

Mikhail Bakunin_sl

shitlord
2,199
1
Araysar_sl said:
Weren't those the guys who fought AGAINST the Red Army, Bolsheviks and Communists? From what I recall, they were just a bunch of anarchists.
Click to expand...
There's no distinction between anarchism and communism. They did fight against the red and the white armies (at different times) butfora fundamentally communist (and anarchist) society.
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,183
172,411
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
Right. That use of violence means that laws have to be justified. Otherwise violent revolt is what's justified. I'm asking what your justification is (apart from "we're the majority and we can force you to comply").
Click to expand...
I rob a bank and escape, engaging in a shoot out with a police. Is the police trying to justify a law against robbing banks and fighting against the police?

Come the fuck on here.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
I think there's good experimental evidence actually, but I'm not going to talk to you about this right now. If you're interested you can look up information about Catalonia during the Spanish civil war or the Free Territory during the Ukrainian revolution.
Click to expand...
So zero evidence it works better than kther methoda on a large, national scale.

You know deep down right now in human history it isn't feasible. I concede to you that in the future it may be and that point it may be optimal, but that will only be achieved through the progress of other governance philosophies.
 
M

Mikhail Bakunin_sl

shitlord
2,199
1
Araysar_sl said:
If they had the power to do so, well then they would be the majority and 90% of the country would be butt pumping each others anal crevices, no?
Click to expand...
No. They could be 10% of the country with 100% of the military force. What reason would you give them to agree to the terms you've laid out then?
 
TheBeagle

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
9,145
32,074
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
Why wouldn't they just adapt and pick up sponsors that would not Lind being associated with this such as dildo companies?
Click to expand...
Dildo companies don't pay enough in ad revenue to keep one of the big networks on the air. Come on dude. NBC, ABC, CBS, or Fox can't stay on the air advertising Sphincterine to 100,000 people, which is what would happen if they started showing porn. You are getting absurd now.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
TheBeagle_sl said:
Dildo companies don't pay enough in ad revenue to keep one of the big networks on the air. Come on dude. NBC, ABC, CBS, or Fox can't stay on the air advertising Sphincterine to 100,000 people, which is what would happen if they started showing porn. You are getting absurd now.
Click to expand...
Without regulation, dildos may become mainstream and advertisements for them may provide a sufficient revenue stream.
 
M

Mikhail Bakunin_sl

shitlord
2,199
1
TheBeagle_sl said:
Dildo companies don't pay enough in ad revenue to keep one of the big networks on the air. Come on dude. NBC, ABC, CBS, or Fox can't stay on the air advertising Sphincterine to 100,000 people, which is what would happen if they started showing porn. You are getting absurd now.
Click to expand...
You don't even have to go this way. Take their argument seriously. What's the worst case scenario? That people have TVs they program to skip over the gay porn channel? Little Billy one day accidentally sees two dudes buttfucking and that culminates in the end of his life as an AIDS infested nullo-gimp? Even their most hyperbolic scenarios are kind of irrelevant.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
You didn't do any reading at all, did you?

I don't "know" any such thing, nor does anyone else (because it isn't true).
Click to expand...
Again, the two exames you gave show evidence that communism is optimal or even capable of sustaining itself in the current world economy.

How do you know mass media has no effect on ota consumers but communism is feasible right now? Don't be a hypocrite.
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,183
172,411
Mikhail Bakunin_sl said:
No. They could be 10% of the country with 100% of the military force. What reason would you give them to agree to the terms you've laid out then?
Click to expand...
So now we just engaging in scenarios of pure fantasy where there is a country that has 10% of gays who run 100% of the military. Is it this place?

AmDad_MoonOverIslaIslandSc371-0740F.jpg





Well, when that shit happens I'll just throw my hands up and go somewhere else where people share my moral beliefs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.