Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,096
172,320
I'm more confused by Dumar implying that Catalonia and UFT were not Communist states and MB telling me that they were.

WHCIH IS IT???????????????????? HOW CAN 2 COMMUNISTS HOLD 2 OPPOSITE VIEWS ABOUT COMMUNISM?????????
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Bingo.

And I am a man who truly believes in No Gods and No Kings. Hence why I reject radical ideologies, and sit back and laugh and ridicule American politics constantly.

Also I hate basketball.
I hate basketball too. I use to be good and love it up until highschool when you know being 6'3" was huge in a predominately upper class white environment. Oh how my dreams were crushed the first time we played a city school.
 
2,199
1
Uh, you need to read that shit again. I was faux responding to a metaphorical Stormfronter Holocaust denier as in "OH, really, the HOlocaust didn't happen?" The only reading comprehension problem here is yours.
The context was the personIwas talking to. You're not gonna be able to this little sleight of hand with me. I'm not the one who's retarded here.

Special pleading again. Forcing children to labor in factories is not an implicit part of capitalism. There's nothing implicitly about Capitalism that says we need to bomb the Middle East for oil, either. In fact Capitalists could very well play the disingenuous denial games and do all the time. But nice strawman you're arguing there.
So in addition to being ignorant of the necessary conditions of socialism, you're also ignorant of what the actual socialist criticisms of capitalism are. Well I guess that makes sense.

At the time, they felt they were moving inexactly the right directionand itstheiropinion that matters, not yours.
Right, because it's just a matter of my opinion and not at all a matter of applying some kind of standard by which we might measure their claims. We just have to accept those claims cause...you know...they said them.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
I'm more confused by Dumar implying that Catalonia and UFT were not Communist states and MB telling me that they were.

WHCIH IS IT???????????????????? HOW CAN 2 COMMUNISTS HOLD 2 OPPOSITE VIEWS ABOUT COMMUNISM?????????
Dumar = Muslim; Mik = Christian
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I hate basketball too. I use to be good and love it up until highschool when you know being 6'3" was huge in a predominately upper class white environment. Oh how my dreams were crushed the first time we played a city school.
I just live around people who literally worship local college basketball like a new Saint in the Catholic church.

Christ are the fucking retarded about UK basketball around here.
 
2,199
1
Thats where I got my quote from.

Catalonia, in order to hold together its communist utopia resorted to secret police and reign of terror tactics after 2 years and shitted the bed and was defeated by the third.
You're not understanding. The "communists" there were essentially soviet satellite forces. Those weren't the socialists.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
Araysar_sl said:
So you would not consider Catalonia or Ukrainian Free Territory to be Communist states?
I might consider themcommunistic, as in they have tendencies or policies that try (succeed or fail) to promote socialist ideals or even communism. But full, real communism as defined by Marx? Assuredly no. I don't know enough about them to comment, except that Catalonia has gorgeous communist women.

Dumar says words have meaning, while he and Mikhail are literally simultaneously arguing that the word communist has no meaning, that it is so intangible it cannot be touched. It is literally a unicorn, oft talked about but rarely seen.

Projection kiddos.
I can't control what other people think, call themselves, and each other. Capitalism is pro at doing that.

It's not intangible, I just told you what it was. It's about the emancipation of labor at its heart, not subjecting labor to a State that replaced a group of capitalists.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Mikhail, can we see credentials, maybe get a copy of your PhD dissertation so we know you aren't some dipshit who picked up a book on Marx one day at Barns and Noble...oh wait who am I kidding.
 
2,199
1
You're so mad you must just be reading through straight blood red right now
Well you're completely making up shit at this point. I honestly can't tell if its deliberate or if I've just been wasting my time talking to someone that genuinely fucking stupid that he can't keep basic facts straight in his head. If it's the second, then yeah I'm a little upset, but mostly at myself really. I mean if you're that fucking stupid you can't really help it.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
I might consider themcommunistic, as in they have tendencies or policies that try (succeed or fail) to promote socialist ideals or even communism. But full, real communism as defined by Marx? Assuredly no. I don't know enough about them to comment, except that Catalonia has gorgeous communist women.



I can't control what other people think, call themselves, and each other. Capitalism is pro at doing that.

It's not intangible, I just told you what it was. It's about the emancipation of labor at its heart, not subjecting labor to a State that replaced a group of capitalists.
Dumar do you think a communist society, the utopia that Marx describes is possible currently?
 
2,199
1
Yeah no.

You really gotta take a break bro. You're starting to embarass yourself at this point.
Yeah that's what I thought. You've got nothing. You do this every single time. As soon as we get into the particulars of political taxonomy and what an actual rational approach here is, you just run away with this weak ass dodge bullshit. You suck, bro.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
The context was the person I was talking to.
What? No it wasn't. Jesus Christ you're so mad you literally have lost your fucking mind.

Again.

So in addition to being ignorant of the necessary conditions of socialism, you're also ignorant of what the actual socialist criticisms of capitalism are. Well I guess that makes sense.
Yeah no.

Right, because it's just a matter of my opinion and not at all a matter of applying some kind of standard by which we might measure their claims.
No, its about applying a standard metric that isn't so ideologically slender that literally nothing fits into that definition except your masturbatory fantasies you came up high on mushrooms one night.

Literally everything I've applied has been what would be considered a standard metric in any other scenario. Was the person prolifically known in their field? Yes. Did they lead a large movement that labeled itself in a certain way? Yes. Did that person claim they were X? Yes. You're the one coming up with absurd metrics that literally no one but Dumar agrees should be applied, then crying when we all laugh at how you think we're stupid enough to fall for an intellectually dishonest revisionist history that innoculates exclusively your ideology from all reproach, even the reproach EARNED BY THE RESULTS OF ITS OWN ACTIONS.

Save it kiddo. Your appeals fall on deaf ears.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Yeah that's what I thought. You've got nothing. You do this every single time. As soon as we get into the particulars of political taxonomy and what an actual rational approach here is, you just run away with this weak ass dodge bullshit. You suck, bro.
Do communist get together and read verses, erm excerpts from the manifesto on Tuesdays (the most neutral of days)?
 
2,199
1
yeah, names dont mean anything anywhere anymore ya know, because north korea isnt really democratic
I don't know man...it is in the name and I've heard it from a very reputable source that that's what really matters. I mean they DO call themselves democratic and I've heard they have DEMOCRATIC elections where (where the winners come in in a landslide). Sounds like they're a democracy to me, bro.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I might consider themcommunistic, as in they have tendencies or policies that try (succeed or fail) to promote socialist ideals or even communism. But full, real communism as defined by Marx? Assuredly no. I don't know enough about them to comment, except that Catalonia has gorgeous communist women.
But Mikhail said that Marx didn't define Communism and so his definition doesn't matter. Now you're telling us that nothing that's ever happened actually fit Marx's definition, so it doesn't matter. Which is it?

I can't control what other people think, call themselves, and each other. Capitalism is pro at doing that.
But Communism, you know, with all the disappearing people to gulags, slaughtering them in the street, letting them starve to death in their homes during the Soviet winter, none of this way any good at controlling anyone, right?

Becauseit wasn't really Communism

But of course, if Capitalists are starving people, sending them to gulags, slaughtering them in the street, letting them starve to death in the homes during the North American winter, wellthen its clearly all Capitalism's fault

But this isn't a case of special pleading. oh no.

It's not intangible, I just told you what it was. It's about the emancipation of labor at its heart, not subjecting labor to a State that replaced a group of capitalists.
Ex post facto revisionism at its finest.


Also what the fuck does emanicipation of labor at its heart MEAN, and why does it MATTER when most LABOR is going to be replaced by ROBOTS long long long before Marx's vision (or Marx's NOT VISION according to Mikhail) comes true?

Derp.
 
2,199
1
No thanks. I'm going to continue to judge you based on your so far sub par results.

Just like any sane person does.
You're literally so stupid you think an argument about the proper approach to taxonomy is has to do with intentions vs. results. I literally don't know what to say. What can men do against such reckless stupidity?
 
2,199
1
Dumar says words have meaning, while he and Mikhail are literally simultaneously arguing that the word communist has no meaning, that it is so intangible it cannot be touched. It is literally a unicorn, oft talked about but rarely seen.
Communism is when someone calls something communist. That's introductory logic.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
You're literally so stupid you think an argument about the proper approach to taxonomy is has to do with intentions vs. results. I literally don't know what to say. What can men do against such reckless stupidity?
Results you say. Then there has never been a communist because there has never existed a true communist society
 
Status
Not open for further replies.