That is pretty cool but he does have a wife that makes more than he does. It probably does make some difference. Just to get the hate flowing early.Good guy Brady keeping his contract reasonable so he can get more rings. Haters gonna hate.
True, but lets be realistic. nobody is going hungry at $9,000,000 a year unless they have the mental fortitude of a 4 year old. Most people won't make $9,000,000 in their lifetime and they still manage to survive for 50+ years.That is pretty cool but he does have a wife that makes more than he does. It probably does make some difference. Just to get the hate flowing early.
I was just looking at that chart comparing them to the other QB's on the chart. Foles has $6M guaranteed. That's more than Flacco and Palmer by about $2M, and in range of Romo.Wait, a 3 year contract that pays Foles as the 21st highest paid qb is a bad contact?
All three of your picks violate the criteria you set forth in the first line of your post.I will always ask this when talking about those mid range QB's. Dump Wilson. Who will you pick up? Realistically no one better? Then he is worth the money. Every consistent playoff QB is worth their money. NO QB will bring your shitty team to the SB.
Below are the salaries of the QB's not working off rookie deals. I just cut it off arbitrarily at Brady. As I look at these the only ones IMO not worth the money are:
Kaperbro. Wont make playoffs anytime soon.
Eli Manning. Won't make playoff anytime soon.
Pey Pey. Will make playoff, but we all see that Manning is a shell of himself.
Do you really not see the connection between a QB making the playoffs and a them having a good team around them? Why is that so hard for people top grasp? Do they really believe QB's just turn to shit as soon as their defense slips?I will always ask this when talking about those mid range QB's. Dump Wilson. Who will you pick up? Realistically no one better? Then he is worth the money. Every consistent playoff QB is worth their money. NO QB will bring your shitty team to the SB.
Below are the salaries of the QB's not working off rookie deals. I just cut it off arbitrarily at Brady. As I look at these the only ones IMO not worth the money are:
Kaperbro. Wont make playoffs anytime soon.
Eli Manning. Won't make playoff anytime soon.
Pey Pey. Will make playoff, but we all see that Manning is a shell of himself.
![]()
True, but that's a bit easier with lighter footballs.Tom Brady carried the Patriots through some pretty mediocre teams, just sayin.
Ummm, the only year he didn't play they still went 11-5? Had Moss from 2007-Gronk rookie year? So two of the most dominant players ever and two of the best slot WRs ever played there but Charmin Soft-Balls carried them? They may cheat at everything they do, but Brady wasn't what carried them. Belicheat did.Tom Brady carried the Patriots through some pretty mediocre teams, just sayin.
Stop reading ESPNOh, and I'm not mad at Brady for being a great team player.I just hate cheaters lol
Brahma_sl said:NO QB will bring your shitty team to the SB.
I have no idea what you're even trying to say.Do you really not see the connection between a QB making the playoffs and a them having a good team around them? Why is that so hard for people top grasp? Do they really believe QB's just turn to shit as soon as their defense slips?
Are you implying you could throw Gronk on any team in the league and they'd win their division? Wait, maybe you're implying is that all it takes is a QB and 1 person they can throw the ball to... there definitely aren't any teams out there who have a superstar receiver or TE to throw the ball to that still struggle to put up wins, definitely not because all you need is a star to catch the balls and anybody could shine at QB, right? Or maybe you're implying that the Patriots have had amazing teams every year since Brady took over at QB (I mean, I guess if you feel that way I shouldn't complain as a Patriots fan but I think you're being a little delusional if this is the case).Ummm, the only year he didn't play they still went 11-5? Had Moss from 2007-Gronk rookie year?
For what it's worth, they had quite the easy schedule that season that he got hurt. Also are you using Moss-Gronk years as your evidence for why Brady never carried a mediocre team?Ummm, the only year he didn't play they still went 11-5? Had Moss from 2007-Gronk rookie year? So two of the most dominant players ever and two of the best slot WRs ever played there but Charmin Soft-Balls carried them? They may cheat at everything they do, but Brady wasn't what carried them. Belicheat did.
Oh, and I'm not mad at Brady for being a great team player. I just hate cheaters lol
And then they got busted for cheating.winning 3 SB's in the process.
I feel like some of their skill position players wish they had done better at it then. It also doesn't really change the debate about Brady having mediocre teams around him in those years before Moss got there. Aside from Brown having the 10th most receiving yards the year he cracked 1,000, no other Pats receiver cracked the top 20 in any other year during that time through 2006. Yet somehow Brady in those 5 full seasons as starter (Bledsoe got hurt in 2001), never was below 10th in passing yards and led the league in 2005.And then they got busted for cheating.