NVidia GeForce RTX 40x0 cards - x2 the power consumption, x2 the performance

Neranja

Neranja

<Bronze Donator>
2,782
4,496
Xexx said:
Im sure there is a 4090Ti lol its just not announced until they are ready to fuck our wallets.
Click to expand...
The TI cards usually come out when the node stabilizes and yields from the fab increase, making the binning process for top end chips possible. Sure, you could get a 4090 Ti today, but they could only produce it in homeopathic doses.

Also, they need something if AMD hits it out of the park. RDNA 2 was too close to home, so you got an 3090 Ti instead of a Titan. Having a "Titan" card nearly beat by a competitor would damage the brand.
 
Malkav

Malkav

French Madman
2,686
1,583
Neranja said:
The TI cards usually come out when the node stabilizes and yields from the fab increase, making the binning process for top end chips possible. Sure, you could get a 4090 Ti today, but they could only produce it in homeopathic doses.

Also, they need something if AMD hits it out of the park. RDNA 2 was too close to home, so you got an 3090 Ti instead of a Titan. Having a "Titan" card nearly beat by a competitor would damage the brand.
Click to expand...

I'd gladly switch to AMD but the issue is that Nvidia managed to lock in a lot of people with all their proprietary shit. Between Gsync, RTX, DLSS (FSR isn't up to par yet), Gamestream, that's a lot of things to forgo if I make the switch.
 
Neranja

Neranja

<Bronze Donator>
2,782
4,496
Malkav said:
I'd gladly switch to AMD but the issue is that Nvidia managed to lock in a lot of people with all their proprietary shit. Between Gsync, RTX, DLSS (FSR isn't up to par yet), Gamestream, that's a lot of things to forgo if I make the switch.
Click to expand...
What you mentioned is gaming stuff, but where Nvidia is really king though is the creator market: With things like RTX Voice, or any GPU-Acceleratred application. Things like Resolve, Premiere, After Effects, etc.

While AMD is still lagging behind, they have started putting in the effort. Their drivers have improved, and they started shipping alternatives to Nvidia software. It will take some time though, and may even never catch up to Nvidia.
 
Malkav

Malkav

French Madman
2,686
1,583
Neranja said:
What you mentioned is gaming stuff, but where Nvidia is really king though is the creator market: With things like RTX Voice, or any GPU-Acceleratred application. Things like Resolve, Premiere, After Effects, etc.

While AMD is still lagging behind, they have started putting in the effort. Their drivers have improved, and they started shipping alternatives to Nvidia software. It will take some time though, and may even never catch up to Nvidia.
Click to expand...

It really feels like Nvidia has an irongrip on devs and studios at this point, locking them down in partnerships to support their proprietary techs. It really is an uphill battle for AMD.
 
Neranja

Neranja

<Bronze Donator>
2,782
4,496
Malkav said:
It really feels like Nvidia has an irongrip on devs and studios at this point, locking them down in partnerships to support their proprietary techs. It really is an uphill battle for AMD.
Click to expand...
At the same time I don't know anyone who really likes Nvidia. Their behavior is a lot like Microsoft before the antitrust lawsuit.

AMD on the other hand has the console market (except for the Nintendo Switch), which makes it hard for game development studios to outright ignore them.
 
Brahma

Brahma

Obi-Bro Kenobi-X
12,943
48,497
Malkav said:
I'd gladly switch to AMD but the issue is that Nvidia managed to lock in a lot of people with all their proprietary shit. Between Gsync, RTX, DLSS (FSR isn't up to par yet), Gamestream, that's a lot of things to forgo if I make the switch.
Click to expand...

DLSS and Gsync is the only one I personally cared about. Is there even a difference at this point between G/Freesync? All those other features I never bothered with.

I don't even bother with the DLSS any longer with a 3080ti.
 
Daidraco

Daidraco

Avatar of War Slayer
10,702
11,360
No matter what happens with AMD - its still worth it to wait till after they release their shit in November. Not only to see if the card is as nice as we would hope, but to see if Nvidia tries to price compete.
 
Springbok

Springbok

Karen
<Gold Donor>
9,690
14,454
1663949681981.jpeg
 
  • 3Worf
  • 1WTF
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 4 users
Malakriss

Malakriss

Golden Baronet of the Realm
12,878
12,268
Soon we'll just have air conditioners built in for how much that fat ass sweats.
 
Neranja

Neranja

<Bronze Donator>
2,782
4,496
Daidraco said:
Not only to see if the card is as nice as we would hope, but to see if Nvidia tries to price compete.
Click to expand...
If the rumors are true, this generation will be a hard time for Nvidia: Production costs for them are 50% up from Ampere for Lovelace, while AMD only has slightly higher costs, mostly for the added RAM chips (going from 256 bit bus to 384 bit bus).

So if AMD can price their 7800 XT at $699 to $799, well below the 4080 12GB easily outperforming it, while still making a nice profit. This would eat up a lot of the low to midrange market from Nvidia, which is probably where the bulk of sales for both companies are.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Leadsalad

Leadsalad

Cis-XYite-Nationalist
6,386
13,719
Daidraco said:
I hate messing with water cooling shit, though. ffs.
Click to expand...
We're just hitting the limits of size for fin space and these usually terrible fans they stick on these things. I'd have expected them to at least gone to 25mm fans to improve static pressure and airflow but apparently they just added more metal and re-used the same thin mediocre fans they were using before.
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
31,802
24,488
Brahma said:
DLSS and Gsync is the only one I personally cared about. Is there even a difference at this point between G/Freesync?
Click to expand...
Yes, actually.

This video is really good, because they compare the ASUS XG27AQM with the PG279QM which are effectively the same monitor but one has G-SYNC and the other is just G-SYNC-compatible-freesync.



Here's the moneyshot though:

1663954261973.png


Without the actual proprietary G-SYNC module, as the FPS drops, the pixel overshoot gets MUCH worse, leading to a huge loss of image quality (ghosting, inverse-ghosting, whatever) at the same time that framerates are dropping.

There's other differences too.
 
Last edited:
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
31,802
24,488
The PG279QM has a hardware G-SYNC module, the XG27AQM is merely Freesync/G-SYNC compatible. The XG27AQM overclocks to 270hz, while the PG279QM only goes to 240hz.

Other than that, they're basically the same panel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.