NVidia GeForce RTX 50x0 cards - 70% performance increase, but AI > you

meStevo said:

Summary:

This Digital Foundry video is a follow-up and apology regarding their previous coverage of Nvidia's DLSS 5. The team admits they posted their initial impressions too soon, before fully analyzing the technology with the rest of their team or gauging audience and developer reactions. The video addresses the heavy criticism, including harassment received by the team, and dives deeper into the technical and ethical implications of this new AI-driven rendering technology.

Key Discussion Points:

• Artistic Control and Ethical Concerns (2:26 - 23:23): The team addresses concerns that DLSS 5 is an "AI filter" that tramples on developers' artistic vision. They clarify that all demos were signed off by the studios, but acknowledge that the dramatic changes, especially on faces, raise questions about maintaining the original intent. They discuss the implications for industry jobs if companies rely on generic AI models to improve lower-quality assets.
  
  
• Technical Analysis (30:30 - 47:15): The team highlights that while the provided footage looks degraded, the temporal consistency of the demos in person was impressive. However, they note that the model seems to work on a 2D plane with limited inputs, leading to artifacts in reflections (like in Starfield) and sometimes losing fidelity to the original design. They discuss the high hardware requirements (multiple 5090 GPUs) and question if this post-processing approach is too heavy a tool for the visual quality achieved.
  
  
• Future Outlook (48:00 - 55:26): The team believes that neural rendering is inevitable for the future of graphics, but successful implementation will require a mix of AI and human input, rather than a one-size-fits-all model. They discuss the potential for this tech to be modded into games and express hope for improved developer controls and optimization in future versions.

Click to expand...

That entire site is full of liberal cuck nuts.

This quote I saw on X says it best.

"They’re apologizing for not waiting to learn what the acceptable opinion to have is?"

Pandering fake asses - every single one of them over at DF.

Also specifically to this:

Artistic Control and Ethical Concerns (2:26 - 23:23): The team addresses concerns that DLSS 5 is an "AI filter" that tramples on developers' artistic vision. They clarify that all demos were signed off by the studios, but acknowledge that the dramatic changes, especially on faces, raise questions about maintaining the original intent. They discuss the implications for industry jobs if companies rely on generic AI models to improve lower-quality assets.

Click to expand...

The only thing these Marxist faggot developers for * most * companies are afraid of is losing divisive Marxist messaging disguised as equality and having everything they do corrected to normal. Art my ass. Another hilarious staple of the Marxist developer guideline. It's a video game - it isn't an Artform. People buy it, play it, move on. Make it fun you will sell more, make it shit and it won't sell. But they aren't here to make money - they are funded as one arm of a media content distribution system to indoctrinate.

Death threats from the Marxists they pander too.