M Power
Silver Squire
- 182
- 163
I'm all for it. Less competition.younger people have been brought up this way too
I'm all for it. Less competition.younger people have been brought up this way too
I live where booze, pot, prostitution, and gambling are legal and I do none of it.Everyone knows the winning move is gambling instead of investing.![]()
Just a joke. I don't drink. I am retired at 55 besides health problems I would be retired now anyway. Mostly due to gambling, not the kind sitting in a casino. Buying stuff that can have zero value for some time or none at all forever. Then having it pay off largely. A lot of stuff is gambling without being the tradition sense of betting on a card game or sports game and such. The most I've ever gambled in a traditional sense is maybe $10.I live where booze, pot, prostitution, and gambling are legal and I do none of it.
I was killing time one evening when we were waiting for my in-laws to meet us for dinner and I put $1 in a video poker machine. I doubled it and took it out. My wife gave me shit about it so I put my now $2 in and won $8. Cashed out then. No rush from gambling and I work too hard to give money away. Hell I even put a pic of my 'big winnings' on FB.
while its not exactly lizard people own the world kinda conspiracy, there does seem to be a general hard push by big companies - google, microsoft, nvidia, amazon, etc - to get people to only use phones and cloud based compute, so they control every aspect of your digital life. driving people away from high compute devices to dumb screens has a lot of advantages for evil tech assholes, and lets them insert themselves in every step that can't easily be circumvented anymore. it helps governments too so they have no incentive to investigate.
younger people have been brought up this way too, so they don't see anything wrong with giving up personal info, letting random companies know all their info, being served ads everywhere, making everything a sub service, not owning anything, etc.
i hope this is true
I’ve read that by the time manufacturing is ramped up to meet the demand, the demand may no longer be there. But I’m not sure that’s correct.The strangest aspect is im working in the industry that makes those chips/silicon for RAM and they are very slow. Im having a hard time understanding why we are so slow when the demand is so high. Something isn't adding up to some extent but im not sure what it is.
All of these tech companies buy in advance so if they already ordered then demand will always be known. It's not likely they have a ton of extra stock or anything. I guess the factories could slow down if demand is lower but they'd just lay people off I imagine.I’ve read that by the time manufacturing is ramped up to meet the demand, the demand may no longer be there. But I’m not sure that’s correct.
Which we know they 100% have no issue laying people off, despite record profits.All of these tech companies buy in advance so if they already ordered then demand will always be known. It's not likely they have a ton of extra stock or anything. I guess the factories could slow down if demand is lower but they'd just lay people off I imagine.
Demand is pretty accurately predicted years in advance. Big companies like Apple will buy a year's worth of production up front. Things like AI booms and global pandemics are not factored in. As such, they keep the supply fairly inelastic, because the majority of the time they barely make money.I’ve read that by the time manufacturing is ramped up to meet the demand, the demand may no longer be there. But I’m not sure that’s correct.
anyone buying a $10k graphics card would. although if they're basically trying to LLM your graphics real time, vram might be more important than gpu speed, making the 6000 line more the model, and it's much better on power consumption, especially compared to running 3x 5090s to the 1 6000 worth of vram.Sure I would. Sure WE would!