Bit torn on the self funding through the website bit if the KS fails. I know it's purely psychological as theres no difference in the end , but not sure I'm up for dropping 400-500 directly to them on their own website like I am through the KS funding.
And I know it's stupid too on my part , as there's really zero difference in the end , curious if I'm the only one in that regards ?
Nah, people should feel differently about it because it greatly impacts how your money might be spent.
With 800k at once and a plan you will see more money properly allocated. With money trickling in on a daily basis it becomes really easy to spend too much of the money on some things and not enough on others.
Essentially it requires more trust on your part. With them absent a potential CEO, this becomes a bigger concern. Obviously people should do what they feel most comfortable with. I certainly would not suggest people not donate to a non ks page if ks falls through. I certainly believe they will continue working on the game.
I just know from my experience that it can be easy for spending to get out of line. Even moreso when they do not actually know how much money they will actually get. So you have to balance not overspending versus not spending in key areas because future funding remains a total ?
They have to budget for a finite completion of a project without any idea of how much money they will have to do so. That is pretty much impossible to do accurately. If I budget for one of my businesses, I can still figure out fixed and variable costs which will at least give me a goal. In this case almost all of their costs are fixed. At least having a single big chunk of money allows them to project plan the use of those funds.
I certainly would not be envious of whomever has to manage the funds. Back to your concern. I do think it is a bigger leap of faith to give it to their website. That being said if you give less it may allow them to create enough that you will want to give them more. I suspect a lot of people might feel that way and do the same thing.
One way they can manage the money and expectations is to outline their targets for each pledge milestone. They should have something to show us when they reach 100K, for example. What will that be and how long until we see it?
If they managed that really well and were transparent (as many have begged for them to be itt) they very well could end up with a funded project.
They will need to outline goals for say 100k, 250k and 500k. All goals should include tangibles the fanbase can see. You can't say "500k really clean up the bug database and finish version .08a of the design tools."
That stuff should be part of their goal scheduling but they also need to have unveils that are set to be met x days after a financial level is met.
My biggest concern is them being old school nda, secretive and shooting themselves in the foot. That has been part of their problem to date. While I really don't need to know what they are working on, on a daily basis, the collective of backers do. So even if it opens them up to the inevitable armchair criticism, they still need to be sharing.
Sharing is caring.