Pussification in America: Political Correctness is Gay

Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin_sl said:
Liberal societies are out of their fucking minds sometimes, not all groups of people mix well with others without some kind of cultural integration, specifically sweden is receiving quite a shock from some groups of foreigners. i'm waiting for tanoomba to post some pedantic video about eye color and children, in response.
Click to expand...
I honestly don't understand what your point is. Is it that foreigners are inherently evil?
Guess what? There are disgusting people in the world who do horrible shit. There have always been and there always will be.
We have plenty of laws in place to punish said people and prevent them from doing more horrible shit.
Are you suggesting that hating people before they commit a crime will benefit society somehow?
Are you saying that we're too soft on people who haven't committed crimes yet?
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the video I posted?
Did you watch that video? Did you, on any level, understand the points that were made therein?
Whatever point you're trying to make, you're going to have to rephrase it because I really don't know what you're saying.
 
Swagdaddy

Swagdaddy

There is a war going on over control of your mind
1,960
1,870
Racism can't even be discussed without threads getting locked, pussification of rerolled.org complete.

American Inventorfaggot - come at me nerd reich
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Swagdaddy_sl said:
Racism can't even be discussed without threads getting locked, pussification of rerolled.org complete.

American Inventorfaggot - come at me nerd reich
Click to expand...
Actually, it's entirely acceptable to discuss racism.

"American Inventorfaggot", on the other hand, hardly constitutes any kind of cogent idea or point you'd like to make.

See, there's a difference between "discussing racism" and "being a racist cunt because racism is fun!" If you can't see what that difference is, take a time out until you do and stop shitting up the thread.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Look at that, Tanoomba is defending the harsh legal punishment of a 17 year old for making a joke. Politic correctness is so out of hand. How is making fun of third world , backwards cultures a punishable crime. Along with this and fat fucking cows claiming that skinny people are privileged I don't want to live on this planet anymore. Serious jimmy rustling by overly sensitive faggots

Despite his gargling, fanaskin can at least engage in a discussion and do research, making him a much better poster than tranny.
 
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,329
43,180
Please come up with a better insult than "tranny". It's not even phonetically clever. How about Toonumbnuts? Toodoo? Toogina?
 
chaos

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Swagdaddy_sl said:
Racism can't even be discussed without threads getting locked, pussification of rerolled.org complete.

American Inventorfaggot - come at me nerd reich
Click to expand...
Sure you can. Judging from your post, it doesn't seem like you are interested in an in depth discussion on racism and how it impacts our society, but instead just using provocative words to be edgy or some shit.
 
Lleauaric

Lleauaric

Sparkletot Monger
4,058
1,823
Wahh Wahh Wahhh.. I want to say whatever I want about other people without them getting mad at me.. wahhhhh. Fuck you, you fucking babies.

You, this generation of white suburban middle class males is more pussified than any other race, class, or demographic, and you fucktards whining about people getting mad when you say offensive things actually fucking typifies your disgusting sense of entitlement.

"PEOPLE SHOULDNT GET UPSET WHEN I SAY American Inventor OR FAGGOT, BUT IM GONNA CRY LIKE A 4 YEAR OLD IF THE SERVERS ARE DOWN AN EXTRA 5 MINS OR MY CLASS ISNT BALANCED"

Perspectives, you needs them.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Lleauaric_sl said:
Wahh Wahh Wahhh.. I want to say whatever I want about other people without them getting mad at me.. wahhhhh. Fuck you, you fucking babies.

You, this generation of white suburban middle class males is more pussified than any other race, class, or demographic, and you fucktards whining about people getting mad when you say offensive things actually fucking typifies your disgusting sense of entitlement.

"PEOPLE SHOULDNT GET UPSET WHEN I SAY American Inventor OR FAGGOT, BUT IM GONNA CRY LIKE A 4 YEAR OLD IF THE SERVERS ARE DOWN AN EXTRA 5 MINS OR MY CLASS ISNT BALANCED"

Perspectives, you needs them.
Click to expand...


Fuckin' A!
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Lleauaric_sl said:
Wahh Wahh Wahhh.. I want to say whatever I want about other people without them getting mad at me.. wahhhhh. Fuck you, you fucking babies.

You, this generation of white suburban middle class males is more pussified than any other race, class, or demographic, and you fucktards whining about people getting mad when you say offensive things actually fucking typifies your disgusting sense of entitlement.

"PEOPLE SHOULDNT GET UPSET WHEN I SAY American Inventor OR FAGGOT, BUT IM GONNA CRY LIKE A 4 YEAR OLD IF THE SERVERS ARE DOWN AN EXTRA 5 MINS OR MY CLASS ISNT BALANCED"

Perspectives, you needs them.
Click to expand...
So you think it is OK for a teenager to be thrown in jail for making a joke on Facebook about an event or a country? Or for fat asses we decry skinny people are privileged while ignoring the fact millions of children die of starvation every year? Everyone needs to get a better perspective, even those who want to spew random bullshit and not fear overly harsh repercussions.
 
Alex

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,530
7,472
Crying for the right for white men to say American Inventor and cunt is not the issue at hand. It's bullshit like a deaf kid being forced to change his legal name because it resembles gun in sign language. Stop changing the conversation.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Alex_sl said:
Crying for the right for white men to say American Inventor and cunt is not the issue at hand. It's bullshit like a deaf kid being forced to change his legal name because it resembles gun in sign language. Stop changing the conversation.
Click to expand...
Swagdaddy changed the conversation when he made the out-of-the-blue ridiculous claim that racism was somehow a taboo topic here, punctuating that claim with intentionally offensive language used for "shock value". If we're to stay on topic, maybe he should stop race-baiting.

Otherwise, we pretty much agree that forcing a deaf kid to change his name so he doesn't scare anyone with his gun-hands is pretty fucking ridiculous. So is holding a kid in jail for a Facebook comment that included "lol" and "jk", literally making it impossible to interpret the comment as anything other than a joke.

We're so overcome by fear (fear of being attacked, fear of offending someone, fear of responsibility) that we've lost our ability to act rationally. It's been shown time and time again that zero-tolerance policies don't work because they remove human judgement from the equation. If we want to keep an eye out for people making dangerous-sounding comments on social media, that's fine. But we can't just use a checklist of red-flag words to determine whether somebody is dangerous or not. It's ironic how North America is more proud of its freedoms than anything else, and yet we keep compromising them in the name of "safety". Crazy people are gonna do crazy shit, and no amount of police state overreacting is going to make us all safe all the time.
 
D

Dunhill

N00b
102
8
Tanoomba_sl said:
I honestly don't understand what your point is. Is it that foreigners are inherently evil?
Guess what? There are disgusting people in the world who do horrible shit. There have always been and there always will be.
We have plenty of laws in place to punish said people and prevent them from doing more horrible shit.
Are you suggesting that hating people before they commit a crime will benefit society somehow?
Are you saying that we're too soft on people who haven't committed crimes yet?
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the video I posted?
Did you watch that video? Did you, on any level, understand the points that were made therein?
Whatever point you're trying to make, you're going to have to rephrase it because I really don't know what you're saying.
Click to expand...
We don't have laws in place to deal with people from barbaric cultures. In the 90s a gang of immigrant muslims got off easy after raping a woman because the court couldn't prove intent. Their view on women was so appalling they didn't understand you can't rape western women. More recently an HIV infected immigrant who had sex with a bunch of women claimed his "level of AIDS" was so low he was certain he couldn't transmit the disease to anyone. It went all the way to the surpreme court that decided that he couldn't be held accountable for his actions. The result of this was the surpreme court making an overhaul of the intent assessments more suitable for Arabs and Africans. They called the new intent form, intent of indifference. (I would be laughing, but...)

It was stated in a report from the 90s that one out of three northern Africans immigrants had been convicted of a crime in a five year period. Considering the female underpresentation the numbers for males were probably closer to 50%. How can anyone honestly say that knowing this you'll treat a person from Northern Africa the same way you'd treat anyone? The result of this report was that you are never again allowed to collect statistical data based on ethnicity. That's why fanaskins newer data suggests only a four time overrepresentation of immigrants in rape. Included in that data are a lot of Americans, Norweigans and Finns among other western countries, not to mention eastern Asians. The per capita numbers of reported rapes in Sweden are the second highest in the world, after Lesotho.

The fact is that very few know about the above as it's not reported in the media. That's why unsuspecting women get raped every day by Muslims and Africans. So yes, you are better off hating immigrants before they commit a crime. Otherwise you might end up like my cousin, raped and badly beaten by an Arab, then forced to relocate because of death threats from the family of the rapist.

That a kid was convicted for making a Somali joke didn't really surprise me because we always had a group of very influential liberals (marxists, socialists, whatever you call yourself this decade), but I always held the US in higher regard because America never had many of those in charge. Looks to me that the US are getting closer and closer to insanity for some reason these days.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Dunhill_sl said:
We don't have laws in place to deal with people from barbaric cultures. In the 90s a gang of immigrant muslims got off easy after raping a woman because the court couldn't prove intent. Their view on women was so appalling they didn't understand you can't rape western women. More recently an HIV infected immigrant who had sex with a bunch of women claimed his "level of AIDS" was so low he was certain he couldn't transmit the disease to anyone. It went all the way to the surpreme court that decided that he couldn't be held accountable for his actions. The result of this was the surpreme court making an overhaul of the intent assessments more suitable for Arabs and Africans. They called the new intent form, intent of indifference. (I would be laughing, but...)

It was stated in a report from the 90s that one out of three northern Africans immigrants had been convicted of a crime in a five year period. Considering the female underpresentation the numbers for males were probably closer to 50%. How can anyone honestly say that knowing this you'll treat a person from Northern Africa the same way you'd treat anyone? The result of this report was that you are never again allowed to collect statistical data based on ethnicity. That's why fanaskins newer data suggests only a four time overrepresentation of immigrants in rape. Included in that data are a lot of Americans, Norweigans and Finns among other western countries, not to mention eastern Asians. The per capita numbers of reported rapes in Sweden are the second highest in the world, after Lesotho.

The fact is that very few know about the above as it's not reported in the media. That's why unsuspecting women get raped every day by Muslims and Africans. So yes, you are better off hating immigrants before they commit a crime. Otherwise you might end up like my cousin, raped and badly beaten by an Arab, then forced to relocate because of death threats from the family of the rapist.

That a kid was convicted for making a Somali joke didn't really surprise me because we always had a group of very influential liberals (marxists, socialists, whatever you call yourself this decade), but I always held the US in higher regard because America never had many of those in charge. Looks to me that the US are getting closer and closer to insanity for some reason these days.
Click to expand...
From what I understand, ignorance of the law never, ever means exemption from the law (even for immigrants), so I don't understand your whole first paragraph. How do you rape someone without intent? In any case, without knowing more about those cases it sounds like the legal system made some pretty terrible decisions there, ones I can neither understand nor justify. In fact, changing laws to accommodate foreigners is pretty racist. Sounds like this is a problem that could be fixed by pulling racismoutof the system, not adding more.

Your second paragraph is also criminally light on context. For the sake of argument, I'll take you on your word. I'm in a room with 30 male Northern African immigrants (let's say I'm teaching them English or something). According to your stats, 15 of them have been convicted of a crime within the last 5 years. What crimes? Rape? Murder? Bike theft? Parking violations? I don't know. The other half have never been convicted of anything. What do I have to gain by assuming they all pose a threat to me, except the reinforcing of negative stereotypes that tend to perpetuate themselves in a vicious cycle? Besides, if the problem is cultural, wouldn't it be beneficial (for everyone) to aid in their assimilation to the best of our ability instead of treating them like ticking time bombs just waiting to go off?

You're right, the media does a terrible job of giving us the information we need. Let's blame the media for that. And yes, let's blame every immigrant who's ever committed a crime for the crime they have committed. I'm not trying to shift responsibility here. But if certain groups are more likely to commit certain crimes, there's a reason behind that. Addressing that reason is not only the best way to try to prevent these crimes, it's pretty much the only way. What you don't get is that hating people before they commit a crime actually increases the odds that they will commit that crime. You're part of the problem as long as you consider a group of people "the bad guys".

At least we can both agree that the USA is going crazy.
 
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,329
43,180
Do we have a source/citation for the gang-rape without intention case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.