Shazam! (2019)

Gamma Rays

[REDACTED]
<Donors Crew>
2,832
14d 2h 55m
Reactions
4,863 2,107 0 0
#41
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
 

ohkcrlho

Vyemm Raider
4,914
5d 17h 48m
Reactions
1,308 809 0 0
#42
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
You re right.
He had evil genes or something lol
 
Last edited:

pharmakos

bµɐʁwɐʞoƨ
<Donors Crew>
9,689
19d 22h 28m
Reactions
5,389 2,033 0 0
#43
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
even The Rock himself admits Doom sucks
 

Xadion

Avatar of War Slayer
6,848
27d 6h 0m
Reactions
8,543 621 0 0
#44
Doom was stupid fun - the fact they went 1st person like the game and had judge dread make faces like the game UI was perfect.

I should watch it tonight on Netflix or whaever
 

BoozeCube

Orange Man Bad
<Prior Amod>
10,657
41d 2h 2m
Reactions
42,343 5,066 0 0
#45
I feel similar to most in this thread in that the live action DC movies just suck shit through a straw. It’s weird too because they can make some decent animated movies, but the failures in charge can not translate them into live action. The best movie they have done in the last few years was Wonder Woman and that was mostly because Gal Gadot was a good casting choice and hot as fuck. The plot in that movie was garbage and throwing Captain Kirk in just made it dumber. I expect this movie to completely shit the bed which means it will be a pleasant surprise if it doesn’t.
 

Mahes

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,673
5d 2h 34m
Reactions
407 14 0 0
#46
I liked Christopher Nolan's three batman movies. Those have been the best DC has had to offer. Wonder Woman was pretty good but no where close to a lot of the Marvel movies. Shazam looks fun but if comedy is the only way DC can do well, then DC will not do well.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
5,854
20d 4h 39m
Reactions
14,141 3,294 0 0
#47
From the company that brought us Batman Forever and Batman & Robin, the delight we experienced from the Dark Knight trilogy (at least TDK alone), we should have known to be short-lived. It's a shame, because it seems it would be simple to make something awesome, as mentioned, given the success of pretty much all of their animated movies.
 

k^M

Knight of the Realm
967
2d 4h 27m
Reactions
358 42 0 0
#48
If only a partnership could be created that gave Marvel license to make live action films using DC properties, and DC any/all rights to animation. It'd be a license to print money
 

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Knight of the Realm
967
1d 22h 12m
Reactions
294 31 0 0
#49
The best DC had to offer was done in 1978 or 1989, take your pick. :p

Superman II, the second Nolan Batman movie and Wonder Woman were also pretty good.

I can't think of any other DC move that was anywhere close to as good as those above.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
5,854
20d 4h 39m
Reactions
14,141 3,294 0 0
#50
People who think the original Superman movies were good are muddled by classic rose tinted glasses. They aren't that good in retrospect, including Superman 2. It's simple stage performance, while great, is all it has. The 89 Batman I can still watch, and even with its cheese is still a very enjoyable watch with a very low proclivity for "this is stupid, and the effects are dumb". I'm a huge Superman fanboi, and I still don't have much fondness for any of the original films. Though I do have a special appreciation for red krypyonite (synthetic green krypyonite) Superman getting drunk and flicking peanuts, then getting tossed into a grinder when fighting Clark Kent.

It makes me think people of a certain age, and their appreciation for films from the 70's and 80's without the concept of modern films, like Jaws, which is a great film, but when you go back and watch it today (I literally did a few days ago), the flighty thematic music (outside the thematic duh-duh track), cheesy grim character portrayals, it's very light and not so serious given serious threats. Like much of Spielberg, the fun was the point.

Much of modern DC films lack any significance where fun is concerned, and how they mold that into a serious narrative. So maybe folks of a certain age, myself and the masses included, are seeing that lack of cohesion.
 

Chanur

Not Soygen
<Donor All-Stars>
16,078
36d 18h 57m
Reactions
7,721 782 0 0
#51
Have you ever watched Faster? If you haven't, watch Faster. His emotional range in that movie starts at "pissed off" and goes to "super duper pissed off get the fuck out of his way because he's trying to kill motherfuckers". He's literally out for revenge the entire movie, from start to finish. It is one of my favorite Rock movies.
Its the movie that converted me to a fanboy. It's an awesome revenge flick.
 

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Knight of the Realm
967
1d 22h 12m
Reactions
294 31 0 0
#52
People who think the original Superman movies were good are muddled by classic rose tinted glasses. They aren't that good in retrospect, including Superman 2. It's simple stage performance, while great, is all it has. The 89 Batman I can still watch, and even with its cheese is still a very enjoyable watch with a very low proclivity for "this is stupid, and the effects are dumb". I'm a huge Superman fanboi, and I still don't have much fondness for any of the original films. Though I do have a special appreciation for red krypyonite (synthetic green krypyonite) Superman getting drunk and flicking peanuts, then getting tossed into a grinder when fighting Clark Kent.

It makes me think people of a certain age, and their appreciation for films from the 70's and 80's without the concept of modern films, like Jaws, which is a great film, but when you go back and watch it today (I literally did a few days ago), the flighty thematic music (outside the thematic duh-duh track), cheesy grim character portrayals, it's very light and not so serious given serious threats. Like much of Spielberg, the fun was the point.

Much of modern DC films lack any significance where fun is concerned, and how they mold that into a serious narrative. So maybe folks of a certain age, myself and the masses included, are seeing that lack of cohesion.
I say that despite your points about the Superman movies or Batman the Movie, that they're STILL better than most of the DC movies, however you wanna analyze it.
YMMV, I suppose.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
5,854
20d 4h 39m
Reactions
14,141 3,294 0 0
#53
I say that despite your points about the Superman movies or Batman the Movie, that they're STILL better than most of the DC movies, however you wanna analyze it.
YMMV, I suppose.
Not that I disagree, but seeing the color of Margot Kidder's bra color doesn't make it a good movie. Just that it fits with the standing quality of all that has come out of the WB studios.
 

Lendarios

Accused AnalRapist
<Donors Crew>
12,642
Reactions
6,785 10,874 0 0
#55
Saw teh trailer today. I was a huge Chuck fan so I hope this does good for him.
 

Lithose

<Donors Crew>
16,270
46d 6h 44m
Reactions
44,751 1,190 0 0
#56
I feel similar to most in this thread in that the live action DC movies just suck shit through a straw. It’s weird too because they can make some decent animated movies, but the failures in charge can not translate them into live action. The best movie they have done in the last few years was Wonder Woman and that was mostly because Gal Gadot was a good casting choice and hot as fuck. The plot in that movie was garbage and throwing Captain Kirk in just made it dumber. I expect this movie to completely shit the bed which means it will be a pleasant surprise if it doesn’t.
Animated Universe is done by huge comic book fans that work in the film/animation industry. The regular films are done by huge directors who have maybe read some of the more famous Comics from each of the characters.

Check out the contrast between that and Marvel's directors, which were mostly kind of even niche/weird (Favereu, Whedon), or unknowns (Russo Brothers), who are massive Comic book nerds and often directly attribute their desire to make movies to the comics and stories of their youth.

The fact is that when a director really loves the character, it comes through in small ways that add up to a lot. The only one who I think ever broke this rule for me was Nolan with Batman. Nolan was not a huge Batman nut, but the guy is such a fucking ridiculously good director and Batman is such a grounded character in his most basic form (No powers, pretty elemental motivation ect), that it worked. But people like Snyder? Are just not good enough to do that with, and characters that are more "weird", like even Superman? Also won't work with.
 

TrollfaceDeux

The Slayer Supreme of the Thousand Shadowban
16,912
8d 7h 30m
Reactions
8,290 2,687 0 0
#59
Trailers are on point and holy shit...it's DC...