Shazam! (2019)

Gamma Rays

Large sized member
<Donors Crew>
2,917
7,438
17d 11h 45m
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohkcrlho

ohkcrlho

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,944
1,967
6d 19h 15m
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
You re right.
He had evil genes or something lol
 
Last edited:

pharmakos

bµɐʁwɐʞoƨ
<Donors Crew>
10,337
9,149
25d 12h 8m
The rock was also the bad guy ( edit: turned into a bad guy ) in that Doom movie. . . . I think if I remember right.

I saw that one in the cinemas and haven't re-watched or even seen reference to it since.
even The Rock himself admits Doom sucks
 

Xadion

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,150
12,126
33d 3h 31m
Doom was stupid fun - the fact they went 1st person like the game and had judge dread make faces like the game UI was perfect.

I should watch it tonight on Netflix or whaever
 

BoozeCube

The Wokest
<Prior Amod>
12,092
77,122
56d 14h 33m
I feel similar to most in this thread in that the live action DC movies just suck shit through a straw. It’s weird too because they can make some decent animated movies, but the failures in charge can not translate them into live action. The best movie they have done in the last few years was Wonder Woman and that was mostly because Gal Gadot was a good casting choice and hot as fuck. The plot in that movie was garbage and throwing Captain Kirk in just made it dumber. I expect this movie to completely shit the bed which means it will be a pleasant surprise if it doesn’t.
 

Mahes

Molten Core Raider
1,727
542
6d 18h 7m
I liked Christopher Nolan's three batman movies. Those have been the best DC has had to offer. Wonder Woman was pretty good but no where close to a lot of the Marvel movies. Shazam looks fun but if comedy is the only way DC can do well, then DC will not do well.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
6,507
22,852
24d 2h 36m
From the company that brought us Batman Forever and Batman & Robin, the delight we experienced from the Dark Knight trilogy (at least TDK alone), we should have known to be short-lived. It's a shame, because it seems it would be simple to make something awesome, as mentioned, given the success of pretty much all of their animated movies.
 

k^M

Molten Core Raider
1,022
548
2d 20h 32m
If only a partnership could be created that gave Marvel license to make live action films using DC properties, and DC any/all rights to animation. It'd be a license to print money
 

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,063
490
2d 22h 49m
The best DC had to offer was done in 1978 or 1989, take your pick. :p

Superman II, the second Nolan Batman movie and Wonder Woman were also pretty good.

I can't think of any other DC move that was anywhere close to as good as those above.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
6,507
22,852
24d 2h 36m
People who think the original Superman movies were good are muddled by classic rose tinted glasses. They aren't that good in retrospect, including Superman 2. It's simple stage performance, while great, is all it has. The 89 Batman I can still watch, and even with its cheese is still a very enjoyable watch with a very low proclivity for "this is stupid, and the effects are dumb". I'm a huge Superman fanboi, and I still don't have much fondness for any of the original films. Though I do have a special appreciation for red krypyonite (synthetic green krypyonite) Superman getting drunk and flicking peanuts, then getting tossed into a grinder when fighting Clark Kent.

It makes me think people of a certain age, and their appreciation for films from the 70's and 80's without the concept of modern films, like Jaws, which is a great film, but when you go back and watch it today (I literally did a few days ago), the flighty thematic music (outside the thematic duh-duh track), cheesy grim character portrayals, it's very light and not so serious given serious threats. Like much of Spielberg, the fun was the point.

Much of modern DC films lack any significance where fun is concerned, and how they mold that into a serious narrative. So maybe folks of a certain age, myself and the masses included, are seeing that lack of cohesion.
 

Chanur

Not Soygen
<Donor All-Stars>
16,384
11,306
42d 4h 36m
Have you ever watched Faster? If you haven't, watch Faster. His emotional range in that movie starts at "pissed off" and goes to "super duper pissed off get the fuck out of his way because he's trying to kill motherfuckers". He's literally out for revenge the entire movie, from start to finish. It is one of my favorite Rock movies.
Its the movie that converted me to a fanboy. It's an awesome revenge flick.
 

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,063
490
2d 22h 49m
People who think the original Superman movies were good are muddled by classic rose tinted glasses. They aren't that good in retrospect, including Superman 2. It's simple stage performance, while great, is all it has. The 89 Batman I can still watch, and even with its cheese is still a very enjoyable watch with a very low proclivity for "this is stupid, and the effects are dumb". I'm a huge Superman fanboi, and I still don't have much fondness for any of the original films. Though I do have a special appreciation for red krypyonite (synthetic green krypyonite) Superman getting drunk and flicking peanuts, then getting tossed into a grinder when fighting Clark Kent.

It makes me think people of a certain age, and their appreciation for films from the 70's and 80's without the concept of modern films, like Jaws, which is a great film, but when you go back and watch it today (I literally did a few days ago), the flighty thematic music (outside the thematic duh-duh track), cheesy grim character portrayals, it's very light and not so serious given serious threats. Like much of Spielberg, the fun was the point.

Much of modern DC films lack any significance where fun is concerned, and how they mold that into a serious narrative. So maybe folks of a certain age, myself and the masses included, are seeing that lack of cohesion.
I say that despite your points about the Superman movies or Batman the Movie, that they're STILL better than most of the DC movies, however you wanna analyze it.
YMMV, I suppose.
 

a c i d.f l y

ಠ_ಠ
<Moderation Tools>
6,507
22,852
24d 2h 36m
I say that despite your points about the Superman movies or Batman the Movie, that they're STILL better than most of the DC movies, however you wanna analyze it.
YMMV, I suppose.
Not that I disagree, but seeing the color of Margot Kidder's bra color doesn't make it a good movie. Just that it fits with the standing quality of all that has come out of the WB studios.
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Mudcrush Durtfeet

Lithose

<Donors Crew>
16,784
63,793
56d 10h 6m
I feel similar to most in this thread in that the live action DC movies just suck shit through a straw. It’s weird too because they can make some decent animated movies, but the failures in charge can not translate them into live action. The best movie they have done in the last few years was Wonder Woman and that was mostly because Gal Gadot was a good casting choice and hot as fuck. The plot in that movie was garbage and throwing Captain Kirk in just made it dumber. I expect this movie to completely shit the bed which means it will be a pleasant surprise if it doesn’t.
Animated Universe is done by huge comic book fans that work in the film/animation industry. The regular films are done by huge directors who have maybe read some of the more famous Comics from each of the characters.

Check out the contrast between that and Marvel's directors, which were mostly kind of even niche/weird (Favereu, Whedon), or unknowns (Russo Brothers), who are massive Comic book nerds and often directly attribute their desire to make movies to the comics and stories of their youth.

The fact is that when a director really loves the character, it comes through in small ways that add up to a lot. The only one who I think ever broke this rule for me was Nolan with Batman. Nolan was not a huge Batman nut, but the guy is such a fucking ridiculously good director and Batman is such a grounded character in his most basic form (No powers, pretty elemental motivation ect), that it worked. But people like Snyder? Are just not good enough to do that with, and characters that are more "weird", like even Superman? Also won't work with.