Couldnt you do that in 2?the real question is will you be able to walk underneath an at-at, shoot a grapple gun up into it, and then toss a grenade into its soft underbelly
or do the porkins harpoon "tie up legs" move
Only while playing the Luke Skywalker heroic persona because you need a lightsaber for it! Only $10.99 to unlock <click here to enter your cc details>the real question is will you be able to walk underneath an at-at, shoot a grapple gun up into it, and then toss a grenade into its soft underbelly
Yep I do play some multi player on Dice games but I definitely play through the single player. Not happy about this.No single player is pretty retarded.
Dice single-player campaigns are mediocre at best so I don't care that they left it out.Yep I do play some multi player on Dice games but I definitely play through the single player. Not happy about this.
But... whats wrong with Battlefield: StarWars? Dont get me wrong, I am all down with all the complaints about limited number of players (probl because fuck if the so called next gen consoles can handle more going on) limited number of maps (gotta keep those DLC packs selling!) and so on, but I cant see how the game itself is bad just because Battlefield?Does anyone expect this to be anything but Battlefield StarWars? Since it was announced that Dice was given Battlefront I'd just assumed it would just be a reskinned battlefield game and it's kinda looking like that's what we're getting. I'm sure we'll eventually get a great linear Star Wars game with big space battles, ground combat and no multilayer which won't be made by Dice. This is definitely a game not to pre-order. Wait for the reviews, and probably wait for the loads of DLC to be bundled with the game a year after it comes out.
For me, it's because Battlefront was a pretty unique game. Battlefield: Star Wars would be nothing like the originals, and I don't want to play yet another Battlefield variant.But... whats wrong with Battlefield: StarWars? Dont get me wrong, I am all down with all the complaints about limited number of players (probl because fuck if the so called next gen consoles can handle more going on) limited number of maps (gotta keep those DLC packs selling!) and so on, but I cant see how the game itself is bad just because Battlefield?
I don't think there will be anything wrong with Battlefield:StarWars. If it's well done and not buggy I'm sure I'll have a lot of fun with it. Just saying that people shouldn't expect to get a modern version of the Battlefront game they loved in 2005.But... whats wrong with Battlefield: StarWars? Dont get me wrong, I am all down with all the complaints about limited number of players (probl because fuck if the so called next gen consoles can handle more going on) limited number of maps (gotta keep those DLC packs selling!) and so on, but I cant see how the game itself is bad just because Battlefield?