Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow (2026)

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
46,135
125,349
Batman: The Animated Series is thoroughly amazing. However the 90s Superman cartoon in the same studio is just as amazing. I watch 90s Batman sometimes because it just holds up so well. Superman too. Even the X-Men of the 90s is great.


This is by far my favorite episode of anything Superman. It stuck with me even as a kid. I was maybe 11 when I saw it. Clark Kent as a nobody journalist is able to solve a murder case and he didn't want to solve it as Superman. The killer realized Clark was onto him and carbombed him. Not knowing he was Superman and just survived it he then had to find a way to come back. The killer gets executed and just can't figure out how Clark survived the carbomb until he has the horrifying realization that Clark Kent IS SUPERMAN then dies in the gas chamber.
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS

Molten Core Raider
983
1,254
I don’t understand how people can say the new Superman movie sucks because he get’s overshadowed by everyone else and then praise The Batman in spite of that Batman failing at everything. Like, you do realize that The Batman didn’t succeed in stoping any crime or saving the city? He fucking failed, that’s a shitty Batman movie.

But I accepted these movies stopped being made for people like me around endgame and that people like watching superheroes, especially white males, fail unless they get help from women and PoC.

Too each their own.
Rocky didn’t win at the end of his movie.

The Batman isn’t without criticism but I did enjoy it. And I didn’t even dislike it for the reasons you cited, I more disliked that the strong independent black female mayor ran a campaign against white men, etc that felt a little too on the nose. Cat lady being a racist pos is fine, but she’s a criminal and is not a good person. She’s no Anne Hathaway charisma wise but she was acceptable.

tbh, I think Zoe Kravitz is abrasive in everything I’ve seen her in except Mad Max Fury Road. And I’ve seen her speak in person before, still arrogant and abrasive.
 

rhinohelix

Dental Dammer
<Gold Donor>
3,439
5,762
Note: I posted this waaay before I was done, so multiple edits have been ongoing, my apologies for the changing in-development nature of the writing.

Folks are making a lot of great points now in this thread and I want to comment on a bunch of them:

Rocky didn’t win at the end of his movie.

The Batman isn’t without criticism but I did enjoy it. And I didn’t even dislike it for the reasons you cited, I more disliked that the strong independent black female mayor ran a campaign against white men, etc that felt a little too on the nose. Cat lady being a racist pos is fine, but she’s a criminal and is not a good person. She’s no Anne Hathaway charisma wise but she was acceptable.

tbh, I think Zoe Kravitz is abrasive in everything I’ve seen her in except Mad Max Fury Road. And I’ve seen her speak in person before, still arrogant and abrasive.

I think people who like The Batman tend to like the style of The Batman potentially more than movie itself as a cinematic whole. The movie *looks* great and Matt Reeves is a fantastic director; the movie isn't well-written or plotted at all, though. The same "he never stopped any of them" criticism has been leveled at Indy in Raiders but that movie is an Archeology professor and adventurer reacting to Nazis trying to get a relic, not the World's Greatest Detective™ dueling with the Riddler.

It's also got the most Woke trappings of any super hero movie I can think of off the top of my head. It's such a product of its time; it won't age well.

Rocky's victory isn't in winning the actual fight, its in making something of himself. He is beating the system, overcoming his surroundings, society and himself, finding love, and doing something real by not being a bum. Him going the distance and walking away is the victory. He was a massive underdog who showed good. People loved it so much, it resonated with the audience so resoundingly that they demanded Stallone make a sequel where he gets to win, because in the 80s we still believed in happy endings. Cynicism is the order of the day now, and it feels like its more being fed by the artists than demanded by the audience.

The people making these movies stopped caring about making money and care more about their ESG scores. These studios are also populated with activists at every level. It's not just the studios, though: I work for a traditional energy company, and you would not believe the Green energy advocates who hate "Fossil fuels" who are happy to have them pay their bills who ask questions at high level Q&As,


Batman: The Animated Series is thoroughly amazing. However the 90s Superman cartoon in the same studio is just as amazing. I watch 90s Batman sometimes because it just holds up so well. Superman too. Even the X-Men of the 90s is great.


This is by far my favorite episode of anything Superman. It stuck with me even as a kid. I was maybe 11 when I saw it and it stuck with me. Clark Kent as a nobody journalist is able to solve a murder case and he didn't want to solve it as Superman. The killer realized Clark was onto him and carbombed him. Not knowing he was Superman and just survived it he then had to find a way to come back. The killer gets executed and just can't figure out how Clark survived the carbomb until he has the horrifying realization that Clark Kent IS SUPERMAN then dies in the gas chamber.

I’d recommend reading “The Dark Knight Returns” (1986) by Frank Miller. It’s probably my favorite depiction of the Superman in comic form. Superman is basically the right hand of the USA govt and how that plays out against Russia and against illegal vigilantes like the Batman.

The Death of Superman (1992) by a handful of authors is also based and genuinely complex. A lot goes into the morality of who Superman saves, does he even need to be Superman, etc. there’s even a point where he’s fighting Doomsday, uses his super heat vision and misses Doomsday but catches a suburban house on fire with people inside. Then Doomsday leaves to Metropolis, so now Supes has to decide to save the people in the burning house or to stop Doomsday from killing more people in Metropolis. Either way: people will die from his choice.

Superman can be written like a boy scout or be written like a complex psuedo Dr Manhattan. It really depends on who is writing him but your complaints are hella valid on how lazy writers have portrayed him.

This is so true: Superman is a cipher such that he can be as much or as little as the writers put into him. He can be boring Big Blue Boy Scout™, or he can be the nuanced version described by Quinton Tarantino in Kill Bill, or he can be the inscrutable Pseudo Manhattan raised by Kansas Farmers, there is so much to be done with him insomuch as the writers want to explore. Plus he has been powered anywhere from You will Believe a Man can Fly™ to Space Jesus to DemiGod; it all depends on what kind of story you want to write. The point is you need to have to story to tell and understand what kind of story needs to be told with the character; that's an intersection of where business, art, and the audience/society all need to meet to be sucessful.

"Evil Superman" is such a tired trope now its as done to death as Zombies. Yes, an uber powerful capricious being was interesting I guess when the trend started but that's because like Batman, comics are produced monthly and writers need to roll out content continuously. EVERY hero has been made a villian, because A) it's easy B) the writers are terrible. Cyclops, Reed Richards, etc all have become horrible monsters because the that's how the writers view them. It's also interesting (at least to me) to map out audience trust in (Divine)authority over time to interest/acceptance in Evil Supermen from a sociological, as well as a psychological perspective. How much do people want to *be* Homelander rather than Paladin Superman? I think the id tide is turning, though, and the time for the Superego Superman is returning.

This is TLDR territory but to wrap up the main issue with all of these movies, (The Batman, Superman, all of the bad superhero movies and shows) is the writers aren't up to the task, whether due to being "lazy", ideological, or just poorly skilled. You could have written The Batman to have the hero stop the Riddler multiple times, and the plan be multi=layered so that it takes continued effort to stop him, not that the hero's efforts are seemingly in vain. You could have Superman not be de-powered to an insulting degree and de-centered in his own story, made incompetent. These writers hate these heroes and what they stand for, ideologically and morally. They change and undermine them, use them for their own devices. The audience has responded with resounding indifference.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS

Molten Core Raider
983
1,254
Folks are making a lot of great points now in this thread and I want to comment on a bunch of them:
demanding do it GIF
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
49,149
107,765
Sheesh, at least post the trailer.



Yeah this looks fairly silly. Anytime a movie reminds me of an SNL skit, it is usually pretty bad. NO to a theater but I might watch this once on streaming like I did with Superman.

A dog pissing on the floor at the start. God these people are fucking retarded.


James Gunn and JJ Abrams both need to be exiled to a world without light.
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Siliconemelons

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
13,882
22,075
At this point i dont give a fuck if he writes a compelling reason for her to be this way. Im sick to fucking death of this negative shit. Give me more street fighter movie trailers, hot lara croft and non faggy cynical tiresome solipsism

Random

I watched the AJole tomb raider movies recently… I now remember why she was considered the hottest actress in her hayday… whew…then her done up at Croft lol wow

Also. Daniel Craig in the first and Gerald Butler in the 2nd lol
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 2 users

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
49,149
107,765
I watched the AJole tomb raider movies recently… I now remember why she was considered the hottest actress in her hayday… whew…then her done up at Croft lol wow
Same. Story was lol but actually seeing an actress look as close as possible to the character and actually doing what the character is known for? Makes it much more palatable than modern slop.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 3 users

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
32,856
95,781
I am a massive Batman fanboy so bear with me. But I love the idea that Superman has no defenses against someone like the Joker. Who despite having no supernatural powers like Superman makes up for it in insanity and depravity. Even an equivalent like Mr. Mxyzptlk (who I also love as a character) is far too tongue and cheek and not straight chaotic evil like the Joker.

1765674482276.png


They're rarely together but when they are you tend to get something interesting.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Goatface

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
11,191
20,799
was watching a show about logging on discovery, they flash little banner, supergirl coming 6-2026 like after every ad break.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
17,779
72,386
I don’t understand how people can say the new Superman movie sucks because he get’s overshadowed by everyone else and then praise The Batman in spite of that Batman failing at everything. Like, you do realize that The Batman didn’t succeed in stoping any crime or saving the city? He fucking failed, that’s a shitty Batman movie.

But I accepted these movies stopped being made for people like me around endgame and that people like watching superheroes, especially white males, fail unless they get help from women and PoC.

Too each their own.
I think the reason several people say The Batman and liked it despite the main character failing is that they know it's part of the story. In the comics there was a really popular run called "Batman : Year One" and a lot of it was about him "figuring out how to Batman". Which seemed to happen a lot in "The Batman" as well, which is OK if it's setting up for a series, but not OK if it's a one off or just a two movie thing probably.

Also Batman failing in that movie wasn't him playing second fiddle to a whole team of other heroes and a dog.... It was the whole "Superman isn't even the main character in this Superman movie" that was a problem.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS

Molten Core Raider
983
1,254
Note: I posted this waaay before I was done, so multiple edits have been ongoing, my apologies for the changing in-development nature of the writing.

Folks are making a lot of great points now in this thread and I want to comment on a bunch of them:



I think people who like The Batman tend to like the style of The Batman potentially more than movie itself as a cinematic whole. The movie *looks* great and Matt Reeves is a fantastic director; the movie isn't well-written or plotted at all, though. The same "he never stopped any of them" criticism has been leveled at Indy in Raiders but that movie is an Archeology professor and adventurer reacting to Nazis trying to get a relic, not the World's Greatest Detective™ dueling with the Riddler.

It's also got the most Woke trappings of any super hero movie I can think of off the top of my head. It's such a product of its time; it won't age well.

Rocky's victory isn't in winning the actual fight, its in making something of himself. He is beating the system, overcoming his surroundings, society and himself, finding love, and doing something real by not being a bum. Him going the distance and walking away is the victory. He was a massive underdog who showed good. People loved it so much, it resonated with the audience so resoundingly that they demanded Stallone make a sequel where he gets to win, because in the 80s we still believed in happy endings. Cynicism is the order of the day now, and it feels like its more being fed by the artists than demanded by the audience.

The people making these movies stopped caring about making money and care more about their ESG scores. These studios are also populated with activists at every level. It's not just the studios, though: I work for a traditional energy company, and you would not believe the Green energy advocates who hate "Fossil fuels" who are happy to have them pay their bills who ask questions at high level Q&As,






This is so true: Superman is a cipher such that he can be as much or as little as the writers put into him. He can be boring Big Blue Boy Scout™, or he can be the nuanced version described by Quinton Tarantino in Kill Bill, or he can be the inscrutable Pseudo Manhattan raised by Kansas Farmers, there is so much to be done with him insomuch as the writers want to explore. Plus he has been powered anywhere from You will Believe a Man can Fly™ to Space Jesus to DemiGod; it all depends on what kind of story you want to write. The point is you need to have to story to tell and understand what kind of story needs to be told with the character; that's an intersection of where business, art, and the audience/society all need to meet to be sucessful.

"Evil Superman" is such a tired trope now its as done to death as Zombies. Yes, an uber powerful capricious being was interesting I guess when the trend started but that's because like Batman, comics are produced monthly and writers need to roll out content continuously. EVERY hero has been made a villian, because A) it's easy B) the writers are terrible. Cyclops, Reed Richards, etc all have become horrible monsters because the that's how the writers view them. It's also interesting (at least to me) to map out audience trust in (Divine)authority over time to interest/acceptance in Evil Supermen from a sociological, as well as a psychological perspective. How much do people want to *be* Homelander rather than Paladin Superman? I think the id tide is turning, though, and the time for the Superego Superman is returning.

This is TLDR territory but to wrap up the main issue with all of these movies, (The Batman, Superman, all of the bad superhero movies and shows) is the writers aren't up to the task, whether due to being "lazy", ideological, or just poorly skilled. You could have written The Batman to have the hero stop the Riddler multiple times, and the plan be multi=layered so that it takes continued effort to stop him, not that the hero's efforts are seemingly in vain. You could have Superman not be de-powered to an insulting degree and de-centered in his own story, made incompetent. These writers hate these heroes and what they stand for, ideologically and morally. They change and undermine them, use them for their own devices. The audience has responded with resounding indifference.
Good points about the Batman (2022) tbh, I haven’t seen it since theatres but I do remember it having decent imagery, beautiful score and cinematography, fun action scenes, but some bad dialogue writing, some bad acting (Robinson crushed it), and being pretty disappointed that the riddler just turned himself in at that cafe. VERY anti climatic for the big bad.

I still enjoyed the movie, even if it has its flaws. Even if it was for more superficial reasons: action, imagery, costume and set design.

oddly enough, and this is absolutely true, the Gotham skyline in that movie was designed after the NYC skyline in “The Room” by Tommy Wisseau. The set designer confirmed it on Twitter recently. I don’t think it’s a troll, either, bc they look similar.

I wish we’d get some more iconic Batman storylines adapted into movies:

- Court of Owls / City of Owls by Scott Snyder

- Batman: Cult by Jim Starlin

- Hush by Jeph Loeb

- Under the Red Hood by Judd Winnick

etc there are so many hood Batman comics that haven’t even been adapted into movies that would make great plots for movies. None of those have had villains we’ve seen before either.

but WB keeps trying to reinvent the wheel instead of using tried and true plot lines.
 

BoozeCube

The Wokest
<Prior Amod>
57,668
347,802
Good points about the Batman (2022) tbh, I haven’t seen it since theatres but I do remember it having decent imagery, beautiful score and cinematography, fun action scenes, but some bad dialogue writing, some bad acting (Robinson crushed it), and being pretty disappointed that the riddler just turned himself in at that cafe. VERY anti climatic for the big bad.

I still enjoyed the movie, even if it has its flaws. Even if it was for more superficial reasons: action, imagery, costume and set design.

oddly enough, and this is absolutely true, the Gotham skyline in that movie was designed after the NYC skyline in “The Room” by Tommy Wisseau. The set designer confirmed it on Twitter recently. I don’t think it’s a troll, either, bc they look similar.

I wish we’d get some more iconic Batman storylines adapted into movies:

- Court of Owls / City of Owls by Scott Snyder

- Batman: Cult by Jim Starlin

- Hush by Jeph Loeb

- Under the Red Hood by Judd Winnick

etc there are so many hood Batman comics that haven’t even been adapted into movies that would make great plots for movies. None of those have had villains we’ve seen before either.

but WB keeps trying to reinvent the wheel instead of using tried and true plot lines.

Honestly it’s mostly the DC live actions that are the constant fucking failures. They have made plenty of solid animated movies over the years with good scripts and stories. Somehow when it’s big budget they pull out the tard brigade and do their best to shit the bed most times.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

rhinohelix

Dental Dammer
<Gold Donor>
3,439
5,762
Honestly it’s mostly the DC live actions that are the constant fucking failures. They have made plenty of solid animated movies over the years with good scripts and stories. Somehow when it’s big budget they pull out the tard brigade and do their best to shit the bed most times.
Your statement about DC movies and tards reminds me about a quote I heard in a documentary about indy/"shlock" films in the section about Russ Meyer, who made such fare as "Faster Pussycat!! Kill Kill!!" and "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls", who was famous for his use of busty actresses. One day, a PA (who was by then a famous director in his own right) asked him "Mr Meyer, where do you find them all?" He said, "Kid, above a certain size they find me." I always think about that line when something consistently happens that really shouldn't be the case. Above a certain budget size, the ambitious retards want to be involved with the prestige movies.

The WB Exec management doesn't understand the appeal of its own properties, has a system in place that encourages meddling with superhero movies, hiring directors/producers based upon great talk and terrible performance, reactionary plans competitors, etc. Meanwhile, under the radar, the animation guys fly under/off the radar, doing work that's both true to comics when adapting stories and true to the characters when doing original works.



Now for the TLDR section:

DC movies were once great. Superman 78 and Batman 89 were great movies. Follow-ups not amazing, the 3rds dubious, and the 4th movies absolute dreck in each case. Honestly, that was the way EVERY movie used to be, there was NEVER a case of sequels being even good prior to The Godfather part 2 that I can recall. They were generally low budget cash grabs. There was never a "The Dark Knight" in a franchise's future; it was always Jaws 3-D and Friday the 13th Part 7.

Kevin Feige (along with Joss Whedon) changed the game completely. Not only did he churn out multiple good movies with lesser known characters, he connected them and then made the Avengers which blew everyone's $2 Billion dollar doors off.

Oh boy this is something I know a bit about.

JL 1 was to introduce Steppenwolf as Darkseid’s Lt.

JL 2 was the “knightmare” scenario hinted at in BVS. Darkseid takes control of Superman or manipulates him to be evil after Lois Lane dies (pregnant with Bruce Wayne’s baby for some stupid reason).

JL3 was to be the big ending with Superfriends vs Darkseid.

now, the Bruce Wayne + Lois Lane sounds ridiculous. But I did like the Knightmare scene in BVS and in SnyderCut. I think seeing Superman being evil would be really interesting.

ultimately, I don’t think WB has good leadership. The comics have been a hot mess since the end of the New 52 in 2016. The movies have been atrocious (with a rare good one like the Batman or the Suicide Squad).

apparently David Goyer’s original cut of Suicide Squad (2016) was really good. I mean the dude made Fury (2014) right before it. He’s an amazing writer director. Fury is one of the best war movies to come out in the 21st century.

I think Snyder crushed it with Man of Steel, even if there were pacing issues and the beginning scene was too long for a blockbuster. Snyder obvi crushed it with 300, Dawn of the Dead, and I personally am hella impressed with his Watchmen adaptation (it’s very faithful to the comic).

but I don’t think WB would let him do what he wanted to do. We see that with BVS being a hot mess, we see that with Suicide Squad (2016), we saw that with Justice League.

WB owns the biggest superheroes IP. Yet they keep shooting themselves in the foot being reactionary and trying to replicate Marvel, and even Marvel hasn’t released a good MCU movie since Infinity War.

I think endgame was entertaining with fan service but an actual good movie from pacing, writing, plot development, etc it wasn’t. They killed the villain in the opening act. Then did a time travel alt universe thing. It just felt like lazy writing imo.

Spider-Man 3 was good to see Toby and Garfield again, but it was made by Sony, and tbh, I think it has the same problems as Endgame.

Deadpool 3 was great, but lesbihonest, that’s very much a Fox production white labeled as Disney.

MCU is dead, unfortunately. The Batman 2 still has hope. Super-strong-independent-woman-who-don’t-need-no-Superman looks like a GOTG clone. Not really interested in that as the actor has the charisma of a door knob.

Tom Clancy wrote alcoholism well with Jack Ryan struggling with it during the Sum of All Fears novel. Alcoholism can be portrayed really well, but, party girl with no consequences is not it, fam. Unless she drinks away her life or something.

I hope the actor and movie does well. But I genuinely don’t see how y’all are attracted to her. Different strokes for different folks, but she just isn’t my type at all.
This is a good summary RE: Man of Steel/BvS/JL.

Post Avengers, DC reacted and tried to rush out its Most Popular Character That Hadn't Just Been In A Trilogy™ and got the guy that is GREAT at adapting stories shot-for-shot but has issues when he doesn't have a comic panel story to work from. The Nolan version of Batman being so successful gave WB the wrong blueprint from which to approach Superman, and Man of Steel suffers for that. Using Batman vs Superman as the template for a lead-in to the Justice League was another mistake; although it gets the two characters together, it works on the page because they have a long history. When they don't have that history, it's setting the stage for trouble like they had here. It's a shame, because I think there was real potential there.

But You can never step in the same river twice, because you aren't the same person and it isn't the same river. Joss Whedon might have tried to rebottle the Avengers magic but it hadn't worked after the first time and it doesn't work for these characters in this moment. Quippy humor was Marvel's thing half a decade before and it was getting tired, plus Zack had started out in a completely different direction.

Lots of bad cuts were being done for WB movies circa 2016-17, as you indicated. But they had Wonder Woman, which wasn't a bad movie but made $800M, thus setting the stage for ruining all superhero movies as a genre; afterward, Feige said he was going to move towards having more female than male heroes in the MCU, thus the M-She-U was born. Aquaman, based on a fairly recent comic basing Aquaman (whose name is actually Arthur) as a Arthurian tale set in Atlantis rather than Camelot) also made $1B, which is why Iron Man and Cap got to die but Thor was paid to stay around and take his shirt off.
It's a great point about the comics for New 52 in DC. It start in Marvel in All-New, All-Different a few years earlier when the Woke infiltration started. I don't take anything written in the last 15 years seriously, or as (my head) cannon.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
18,006
39,751
Your statement about DC movies and tards reminds me about a quote I heard in a documentary about indy/"shlock" films in the section about Russ Meyer, who made such fare as "Faster Pussycat!! Kill Kill!!" and "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls", who was famous for his use of busty actresses. One day, a PA (who was by then a famous director in his own right) asked him "Mr Meyer, where do you find them all?" He said, "Kid, above a certain size they find me." I always think about that line when something consistently happens that really shouldn't be the case. Above a certain budget size, the ambitious retards want to be involved with the prestige movies.

The WB Exec management doesn't understand the appeal of its own properties, has a system in place that encourages meddling with superhero movies, hiring directors/producers based upon great talk and terrible performance, reactionary plans competitors, etc. Meanwhile, under the radar, the animation guys fly under/off the radar, doing work that's both true to comics when adapting stories and true to the characters when doing original works.



Now for the TLDR section:

DC movies were once great. Superman 78 and Batman 89 were great movies. Follow-ups not amazing, the 3rds dubious, and the 4th movies absolute dreck in each case. Honestly, that was the way EVERY movie used to be, there was NEVER a case of sequels being even good prior to The Godfather part 2 that I can recall. They were generally low budget cash grabs. There was never a "The Dark Knight" in a franchise's future; it was always Jaws 3-D and Friday the 13th Part 7.

Kevin Feige (along with Joss Whedon) changed the game completely. Not only did he churn out multiple good movies with lesser known characters, he connected them and then made the Avengers which blew everyone's $2 Billion dollar doors off.


This is a good summary RE: Man of Steel/BvS/JL.

Post Avengers, DC reacted and tried to rush out its Most Popular Character That Hadn't Just Been In A Trilogy™ and got the guy that is GREAT at adapting stories shot-for-shot but has issues when he doesn't have a comic panel story to work from. The Nolan version of Batman being so successful gave WB the wrong blueprint from which to approach Superman, and Man of Steel suffers for that. Using Batman vs Superman as the template for a lead-in to the Justice League was another mistake; although it gets the two characters together, it works on the page because they have a long history. When they don't have that history, it's setting the stage for trouble like they had here. It's a shame, because I think there was real potential there.

But You can never step in the same river twice, because you aren't the same person and it isn't the same river. Joss Whedon might have tried to rebottle the Avengers magic but it hadn't worked after the first time and it doesn't work for these characters in this moment. Quippy humor was Marvel's thing half a decade before and it was getting tired, plus Zack had started out in a completely different direction.

Lots of bad cuts were being done for WB movies circa 2016-17, as you indicated. But they had Wonder Woman, which wasn't a bad movie but made $800M, thus setting the stage for ruining all superhero movies as a genre; afterward, Feige said he was going to move towards having more female than male heroes in the MCU, thus the M-She-U was born. Aquaman, based on a fairly recent comic basing Aquaman (whose name is actually Arthur) as a Arthurian tale set in Atlantis rather than Camelot) also made $1B, which is why Iron Man and Cap got to die but Thor was paid to stay around and take his shirt off.
It's a great point about the comics for New 52 in DC. It start in Marvel in All-New, All-Different a few years earlier when the Woke infiltration started. I don't take anything written in the last 15 years seriously, or as (my head) cannon.
Aliens, Terminator 2, Spider-Man 2, Phantasm 2, all amazing sequels.

tumblr_ba205bac6477eba06addf67e73f9d308_3d35ff1f_500.gif
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Bald Brah

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,240
2,636
Empire Strikes back is still the best Star Wars. Even RotJ was great right up until the Ewoks appeared.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users