The Astronomy Thread

MusicForFish

MusicForFish

Ultra Maga Instinct
<Prior Amod>
41,851
167,551
All this mars talk has me hankering for a little
arnold schwarzenegger eyes GIF
 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users
Cybsled

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
18,384
14,896
Aaron said:
Come to think of it, after writing that about The Moon is a Harsh Mistress I read a tweet (that I can't find now) where someone said that the opening up of a "Moon city" is just an way to paper over the militarisation of the Moon by the USA, in that they can then quickly create some sort of a bombardment system on the Moon whereby they can launch large Moon bolders at the Earth to target enemy nations, simar to what the Lunar Rebels did in Heinlein's novel. It's a crazy idea, but at this stage, I wouldn't put it past some people in the Pentagon and other think tanks to think along those lines.
Click to expand...

It wouldn’t be that much of a “super weapon”

1) You’d still have to launch your payload off the moon. Even if gravity is lower, the rocks still have mass. To launch anything of size/mass, you’d basically need a lunar trebuchet, otherwise you’re spending a fuckton on mass drivers or a rocket system that can evenly lift a large boulder

2) You’d need something precise/guided, otherwise you’re just lobbing rocks

3) your rock would still be slow as fuck relatively speaking and since it’s hard to hide and load a moon boulder launcher, it would be pretty easy to figure out when one is coming

4) the rock has to be large enough and dense enough to survive atmospheric reentry without breaking up
 
Cad

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
31,025
73,467
Cybsled said:
It wouldn’t be that much of a “super weapon”

1) You’d still have to launch your payload off the moon. Even if gravity is lower, the rocks still have mass. To launch anything of size/mass, you’d basically need a lunar trebuchet, otherwise you’re spending a fuckton on mass drivers or a rocket system that can evenly lift a large boulder

2) You’d need something precise/guided, otherwise you’re just lobbing rocks

3) your rock would still be slow as fuck relatively speaking and since it’s hard to hide and load a moon boulder launcher, it would be pretty easy to figure out when one is coming

4) the rock has to be large enough and dense enough to survive atmospheric reentry without breaking up
Click to expand...
And the cost to lob rocks from the moon would be approximately 12 bajillion dollars while we can launch ICBM's nobody can currently stop for relative peanuts.
 
BrutulTM

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
15,753
68
Cad said:
And the cost to lob rocks from the moon would be approximately 12 bajillion dollars while we can launch ICBM's nobody can currently stop for relative peanuts.
Click to expand...
You wouldn't even have to nuke them back, just blow up the launch pads on Earth and wait for them to starve to death.
 
Gravel

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
46,160
166,497
Aaron said:
Y'all making me want to re-read Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy. And then Robert A. Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Click to expand...
And here I was thinking it made me want to watch a movie.

stay beautiful i love you GIF


Where's Elon's bio dome?
 
Last edited:
  • 1Worf
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 1 users
Aaron

Aaron

Goonsquad Officer
<Silver Donator>
10,343
27,443
Everyone here poopooing the idea of Musk wanting to put mass drivers on the Moon to launch shit at the Earth, but here it is straight from the horse's mouth.

And anyone saying: "well, it's just to haul finished goods to the Earth with!" Well, that's what the mass drivers in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress were for too, until the revolution happened and the started hauling bolders at the Earth instead of cargo.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.