The Astronomy Thread

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
18,955
15,478


Manned Moon landings are much more difficult than LEO or rovers

They may still beat us back to the moon if we don’t get the lander shit sorted out. Long term Starship would be beneficial if the cargo capacity pans out, since it will significantly reduce the costs of setting up a base. Short term though it isn’t clear how much lander work they’ve done since they just seem focused on atmospheric reentry Starship at the moment
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
50,329
111,264
It may well be that physics and relativity mean we aren't ever going anywhere
You can still explore and colonize the galaxy without ftl and anti matter propulsion or something equivalent.

It will just a hundred thousand or two years but still very viable. Fusion rocket could get a good sized starship to alpha centauri in 40-50 years. One way trips for anyone going.

Equally big question that is never considered is the long term effects of low gravity on human development. How healthy ia someone conceived and raised in a .5g environment? Might be you need 1g until adulthood so people don't develop into Mr glass.
They may still beat us back to the moon if we don’t get the lander shit sorted out. Long term Starship would be beneficial if the cargo capacity pans out, since it will significantly reduce the costs of setting up a base. Short term though it isn’t clear how much lander work they’ve done since they just seem focused on atmospheric reentry Starship at the moment

I'd be very surprised if its all the same craft. The parameters for landing on the moon and earth are radically different do you are seriously handicapping a ship designed to do both.



Smart thing to do is have Starship ferry a luna specific lander.
 
Last edited:

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
18,955
15,478
You can still explore and colonize the galaxy without ftl and anti matter propulsion or something equivalent.

It will just a hundred thousand or two years but still very viable. Fusion rocket could get a good sized starship to alpha centauri in 40-50 years. One way trips for anyone going.

Equally big question that is never considered is the long term effects of low gravity on human development. How healthy ia someone conceived and raised in a .5g environment? Might be you need 1g until adulthood so people don't develop into Mr glass.

Maybe. Let's say you figure out the deep space travel part - reliable craft that can travel for decades or hundreds or thousands of years without a hitch while keeping everyone alive the entire time. At that point question becomes why? You're too far to trade or make things economically viable with our system, so the only logical reason is you just want to colonize your own planet far away from Earth.

So say that is a good enough reason. And let's say you actually find a planet with similar temperature ranges and gravity and atmosphere to Earth. If the planet has life on it, then you run the risk of having a fatal allergic reaction or dying to microbes in short order because you didn't evolve in that environment. At worst nothing is genetically compatible with you and microbes just see you as a warm bag of water they can multiply in while your immune system is helpless because it doesn't know wtf it is dealing with. Planet pollen or spores triggers extreme allergic reactions because again your immune system doesn't know wtf it is dealing with. Or if stuff is genetically compatible, then you run the risk of getting space ebola or whatever. You'd be on a planet with life and still need to survive inside environmental suits and sealed dwellings. Unless you have the technology with you to genetically engineer the next generation to be able to live on the planet no problem as if they were a true native, then that is a long term issue.

And if it doesn't have life, then in theory you have a "clean slate" to work with, but terraforming isn't trivial and you're still living in suits/sealed dwellings.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Void

Doin' Too Much
<Gold Donor>
10,852
13,796
On top of that, unless you have perfected cryo sleep or suspended animation, you're essentially condemning generations to a life of nothing but the ship. They'll see and hear about all these cool things people that grew up on planets got to experience, but never know them. Assuming they don't eventually revolt and turn the ship around, the intermediate generations might even adopt a "who cares?" attitude because only the landing generation needs to actually know stuff besides maintaining the ship (and at that point it is likely an AI can do most of that anyway). If you're generations 3-8 of a 10+ generation trip, for example, it is going to be sort of difficult for those people to give a shit. More than likely you'll find everyone turning towards a hedonistic lifestyle because they know they are just going to die in deep space, and they may even stop having kids because why condemn your kids to that too?

Obviously there are ways to somewhat counter some of that, but it wouldn't take much to get everyone to stop giving a shit. Let's just use up all the alcohol and fuck ourselves blind (with birth control) until we die out. They literally have nothing to live for except the promise of their future generations, but just because the initial people you send have the conviction to see it through doesn't mean their grandkids do.

So yeah, without suspended animation or AI gestating embryos or something, I don't see generation ships working at all. And that's skipping all the other hurdles once you get there, like Cybsled talked about.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
16,404
1,104
Yeah. We spent 10 generations in a Winnebago that we could never leave but at least we were able to become the first colonists on a new planet and then were immediately killed by a virus. We would be legendary on earth except no one there knows what happened to us because you probably can't really even communicate at that distance. Sure would have been nicer if our great great great great great great great great great great grandparents had just blown up in the launchpad and saved us a lot of misery.
 

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
35,021
85,649
Not to mention the first 500-1000 years on a new planet with no industrial base would probably be worse than being dead. You'd live in unimaginable hardship with a couple thousand people while needing to have as many children as humanly possible.

Sounds like a great fucking time. The ship would probably be better and the ship would be a torture device in any normal time.