Seb: "There is no question about it. It was a political protest. Feel free to google the definitions for 'politics' and 'protest' if you need to. I can also take your hand and explain to you what these people were specifically protesting, and how those things are political. Let me know what you need.
And no, they did not make the problem worse."
I'd like to take you seriously, Seb, I really would, but how can I? You've repeatedly bent over backwards in ridiculous attempts to justify "acting like an asshole" as productive. You think mocking and ridicule is a reasonable way to educate people. You think antagonizing and pissing off your enemies is noble and just. You're just so fucking backwards that I honestly don't even know how to address you any more. You are so deeply entrenched in your ideological nonsense that you are virtually indistinguishable from the SJWs you loathe, the only difference being the causes you choose to busybody about.
Here's the definition of "political protest" I've been using:
"Political protest is the kind of political activity, eg, demonstrations, strikes and even VIOLENCE, usually but not always undertaken by those who lack access to the resources of organized PRESSURE GROUPS, or by those whose values conflict sharply with those of the dominant ELITE." (Emphasis not mine)
Muslim extremists are not the dominant elite. They do not have power over us. They are not oppressing us, even though they'd love to be able to, I'm sure. The Boston tea Party was a political protest. Occupy Wall Street was a political protest. The Draw Mohammed Contest was a "fuck you" to Muslims. It increased tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims, it led to violence, and it almost certainly contributed to the recruitment of more extremists. So yes, Seb, it did make the problem worse.