The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Also, wtf gives you the right to decide that this protest, which was nonviolent, is wrong? Even if you don't directly approve of this method of protest, you should at least be able to recognize that THEY see it as a protest. Seeing as it is, again, non-violent and wasn't shoving it into anyone's face (they weren't forcing muslims to visit it), as a progressive you should at least err on the side of the protestors.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Quaid: "I'm actually not suggesting that. The constitution doesn't have to be 'changed' for an American's rights to be infringed upon. If the American populace curtails their freedom under fear of violent reprisal, then yes, they are being subjected to oppressive force. A group peacefully protesting this infringement is entirely reasonable, especially if by its mere existence it incites the very thing they are protesting."

It's already illegal to infringe upon someone else's rights, ESPECIALLY through violence. How is this "protest" accomplishing anything?
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
It's already illegal to infringe upon someone else's rights, ESPECIALLY through violence. How is this "protest" accomplishing anything?
It is already illegal to discriminate against women. Does that mean people aren't allowed to protest against discrimination?

Wtf are you even saying?
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,216
I'm enjoying watching Tanoomba jump through all these hoops to avoid admitting that I'm right and crushed his bullshit argument with 3 words.
 

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
15,735
14,471
OK so nothing is worth fighting for if it makes someone mad. Got it. Thanks for finally answering my question.

"If you can find me a case where intentionally pissing people off had a positive outcome, I'd genuinely like to hear it."

Boston Tea party. CHECKMATE.
see above
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,859
8,265
And get ready for the next ten pages of defining the words 'politics' and 'protest'.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Quaid: "And get ready for the next ten pages of defining the words 'politics' and 'protest'."

Ten pages? As I've already said, a political protest is an action taken against a DOMINANT ELITE. Muslim extremists are neither dominant nor an elite, ESPECIALLY in North America. Any redefining from this point is going to have to come from you.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Tanoomba your shit argumentation tactics are so old carbon dating won't work on them anymore. What a fucking joke.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
As I've already said, a political protest is an action taken against a DOMINANT ELITE.
This isn't the dictionary definition of a protest.

It isn't the wikipedia definition of a protest.

It isn't the colloquial definition of what most people think a protest is.


So where exactly are you getting this definition?
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,859
8,265
This isn't the dictionary definition of a protest.

It isn't the wikipedia definition of a protest.

It isn't the colloquial definition of what most people think a protest is.


So where exactly are you getting this definition?
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/political-protest/
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,859
8,265
I'll happily use his definition. Unfortunately for him, he's still wrong. Muslim extremists are a dominant elite class with regards to their willingness and ability to exercise coercion through physical force over the Western civilian population.

Violence is every bit a resource as social or economic influence.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Yikes. Well, at least he has a source and didn't directly pull it out of his ass.

However, that definition is, as I mentioned, exactly like the SJW definition of racism. Narrowly defined so that only everything agreeing with you can be counted as a protest. ESPECIALLY when you let them decide what "dominant elite" means and "power group". Muslims most definitely are a power group across the world in suppressing free speech.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
lol. That's why its in the shaw.

Everyone is sorry they click on a Moon Bat thread.

Hide moon bat threads
Ignore moon bat posters
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Quaid: "I'll happily use his definition. Unfortunately for him, he's still wrong. Muslim extremists are a dominant elite class with regards to their willingness and ability to exercise coercion through physical force over the Western civilian population.

Violence is every bit a resource as social or economic influence."

Again, gonna have to disagree. Willingness to use violence does not make one a "dominant elite".

Besides, you dodged my question: Since it's already illegal to infringe on people's rights (especially through violence), then what did the "protest" accomplish? Keep in mind you also haven't shown me that any Americans have "curtailed their freedom under fear of violent reprisal". I sure as fuck haven't seen that happening, but even if it was, you haven't explained how the contest didn't just make things worse.

It sounds to me like you're jumping through hoops and using mental gymnastics to spout half-truths and subjective misinterpretations in order to support an already feeble point in a silly effort to justify being an asshole towards people you don't like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.