- 26,991
- 56,405
Good point.
I guess I did think it would be cool to see Buzz punch him. He is an 80 year old man though, so its hardly an F-16.
Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?
Good point.
I guess I did think it would be cool to see Buzz punch him. He is an 80 year old man though, so its hardly an F-16.
Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?
I've never supported her. Not financially or otherwise. I've never promoted her work or pushed her views on anyone. That's why I used the word perceived in my post.Mario Speedwagon said:That's what happens when you support a well known liar and con-artist.
See above. Also, you're an idiot. "drags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence" is the sentence an idiot would speak. It's also referencing an alternate reality none of us are currently a part of.khalid said:No one is threatening you with physical violence or threatening to destroy your property. These simple points always just fly right over your head though.
You are also far more than a simple Anita Sarkeesian supporter. You are a full convert, someone who drags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence.
I probably make a fraction of what you make and I wouldn't change places with you or anybody else on this forum in a million years.Cad said:Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?
Awww... I hurt poor widdle Khawid's feewings, so he's twying to get wevenge by lying about me being a conspiwacy theowist again...khalid said:Buzz punching Tanoomba in the face would be the best thing to ever happen to him. I mean, in real life, being physically assaulted for his conspiracy beliefs? Shit dawg, he gets wet in the panties at forum abuse.
Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artistI've never supported her. Not financially or otherwise. I've never promoted her work or pushed her views on anyone. That's why I used the word perceived in my post.
Idrags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence
I
But that's OK, because telling me to commit suicide is less of an affront than your ASSUMPTION that someone would key your car, right?
Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artist
Look guys, I got Mario to play the troll after I corrected his false statement!Mario Speedwagon said:Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artist
Nope. Have you always been a compulsive liar, or I do I just bring out the worst in you?khalid said:Yes, this is what you do.
Is it worse than you ASSUMING someone will key your car? Also, can you back up your claim with statistically significant numbers of people actually endorsing the causing of physical harm or property damage to someone because they're a Trump supporter?khalid said:Yes, people saying mean words to you after you go out of your way to provoke them and won't leave them alone is worse than someone keying a sticker on my car.
I'm actually having trouble remembering a single time I've even defended her. Can you find an example?khalid said:Nah bro, he is just saying that to defend himself against the charge that he reflexively defends her. The next time someone is mean to her anywhere on this forum, he will jump in to defend her.
Or in this case, randomly bring her into another conversation in the politics threads. But no, Tanoomba really doesn't try to drag every conversation to Anita and himself at all *rolls eyes*
This is you bringing her into this conversation by the way.You think that's bad? On FOH, even being perceived as a Trump supporter (regardless of the accuracy of that perception) means you deserve anything that could come to you and all bets are off.
...Oh, wait. Did I say Trump? I meant Sarkeesian.
Addressed already.a_skeleton_03 said:This is you bringing her into this conversation by the way.
I legit lol'd. Thanks for that one pal.I'm actually having trouble remembering a single time I've even defended her.
Oh you waved your hand and say "it isn't about that", I see that now.Addressed already.
Ah! You seem to be under the mistaken impression that criticizing you when you get something wrong = defending her.Mario Speedwagon said:I legit lol'd. Thanks for that one pal.
I mentioned her name as an example of something someone could be perceived as supporting in order for any way they are treated to be considered "earned". The discussion is in no way about her. We are not discussing her. How much clearer can I make it? How many arguments with me devolve into somebody nitpicking about something completely unrelated to the point being made? My guess would be "all of them".a_skeleton_03 said:Oh you waved your hand and say "it isn't about that", I see that now.
So basically it wasn't addressed. You did bring her into the discussion. Fact.
So you brought her into this. You mentioned her name. You brought it up as an example of how you are oppressed for your view. By doing so you are saying: "like you support Trump, I support Sarkeesian". You drew a parallel to the two groups of people as a cry for attention or sympathy.I mentioned her name as an example of something someone could be perceived as supporting in order for any way they are treated to be considered "earned". The discussion is in no way about her. We are not discussing her. How much clearer can I make it? How many arguments with me devolve into somebody nitpicking about something completely unrelated to the point being made? My guess would be "all of them".
I disagree.a_skeleton_03 said:So you brought her into this. You mentioned her name. You brought it up as an example of how you are oppressed for your view. By doing so you are saying: "like you support Trump, I support Sarkeesian". You drew a parallel to the two groups of people as a cry for attention or sympathy.
Don't say WE because you can't speak for WE. You can speak for you.
You are complaining about an argument with you devolving into nitpicking when you literally less than 24 hours nitpicked that you were human ....