The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
26,991
56,405
Good point.

I guess I did think it would be cool to see Buzz punch him. He is an 80 year old man though, so its hardly an F-16.

Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?

Buzz punching Tanoomba in the face would be the best thing to ever happen to him. I mean, in real life, being physically assaulted for his conspiracy beliefs? Shit dawg, he gets wet in the panties at forum abuse.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Mario Speedwagon said:
That's what happens when you support a well known liar and con-artist.
I've never supported her. Not financially or otherwise. I've never promoted her work or pushed her views on anyone. That's why I used the word perceived in my post.


khalid said:
No one is threatening you with physical violence or threatening to destroy your property. These simple points always just fly right over your head though.

You are also far more than a simple Anita Sarkeesian supporter. You are a full convert, someone who drags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence.
See above. Also, you're an idiot. "drags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence" is the sentence an idiot would speak. It's also referencing an alternate reality none of us are currently a part of.

Also, you're the guy that was telling me with a straight face that the mass torrent of objective shitposts that tend to respond to me are MY FAULT. Literally, that was your argument. "The absolutely disgusting and shameful way people are behaving? You deserve it!"

But that's OK, because telling me to commit suicide is less of an affront than your ASSUMPTION that someone would key your car, right?
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Cad said:
Isn't living life as Tanoomba punishment enough?
I probably make a fraction of what you make and I wouldn't change places with you or anybody else on this forum in a million years.


khalid said:
Buzz punching Tanoomba in the face would be the best thing to ever happen to him. I mean, in real life, being physically assaulted for his conspiracy beliefs? Shit dawg, he gets wet in the panties at forum abuse.
Awww... I hurt poor widdle Khawid's feewings, so he's twying to get wevenge by lying about me being a conspiwacy theowist again...
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,216
I've never supported her. Not financially or otherwise. I've never promoted her work or pushed her views on anyone. That's why I used the word perceived in my post.
Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artist
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Idrags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the evidence

Yes, this is what you do.



I
But that's OK, because telling me to commit suicide is less of an affront than your ASSUMPTION that someone would key your car, right?

Yes, people saying mean words to you after you go out of your way to provoke them and won't leave them alone is worse than someone keying a sticker on my car.

Now if I took a pile of bumper stickers for Trump and plastered them all around someone's house, all around their sidewalk, all around their car. Put ones all over the faculty lounge, etc, then you are damn straight I would have brought it upon myself if they defaced the stickers or my car.
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
I've been asking tanoomba for a podcast very long time.

I wanna listen to it. cuz you know....add spicy to what is already a rollercoaster ride of awesome.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artist

Nah bro, he is just saying that to defend himself against the charge that he reflexively defends her. The next time someone is mean to her anywhere on this forum, he will jump in to defend her.

Or in this case, randomly bring her into another conversation in the politics threads. But no, Tanoomba really doesn't try to drag every conversation to Anita and himself at all *rolls eyes*
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
i saw tanoomba on a shitposting rollercoaster at 8 AM in the morning two days ago.

That was so funny!
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Mario Speedwagon said:
Look guys I finally got Tan to tacitly admit that Anita is a lying con-artist
Look guys, I got Mario to play the troll after I corrected his false statement!

khalid said:
Yes, this is what you do.
Nope. Have you always been a compulsive liar, or I do I just bring out the worst in you?

khalid said:
Yes, people saying mean words to you after you go out of your way to provoke them and won't leave them alone is worse than someone keying a sticker on my car.
Is it worse than you ASSUMING someone will key your car? Also, can you back up your claim with statistically significant numbers of people actually endorsing the causing of physical harm or property damage to someone because they're a Trump supporter?

Also, I never provoked anyone. You're an idiot. I expressed an unpopular opinion. That was always the worst thing I have ever done on this board, and it is the one and only reason I was assigned my reputation. Again, stop blaming people's shitty behavior on me. We're all adults and can take responsibility for our own actions. I take responsibility for every word I've ever said here. I will NOT take responsibility for the words of others.

khalid said:
Nah bro, he is just saying that to defend himself against the charge that he reflexively defends her. The next time someone is mean to her anywhere on this forum, he will jump in to defend her.

Or in this case, randomly bring her into another conversation in the politics threads. But no, Tanoomba really doesn't try to drag every conversation to Anita and himself at all *rolls eyes*
I'm actually having trouble remembering a single time I've even defended her. Can you find an example?

Also, I didn't "bring her into" this conversation. We're not talking about Sarkeesian. We're talking about your hypocrisy. You know how we know we're not talking about her? Because we haven't uttered a single word about her.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
You think that's bad? On FOH, even being perceived as a Trump supporter (regardless of the accuracy of that perception) means you deserve anything that could come to you and all bets are off.

...Oh, wait. Did I say Trump? I meant Sarkeesian.
This is you bringing her into this conversation by the way.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Mario Speedwagon said:
I legit lol'd. Thanks for that one pal.
Ah! You seem to be under the mistaken impression that criticizing you when you get something wrong = defending her.

Don't worry, people get those two mixed up all the time. Glad I could straighten you out!
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,216
Tanoomba why won't you release your tax returns? Are you afraid it will show the hundreds of dollars you donated to Anita? What are you hiding? Why didn't you pay taxes during 9/11?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
a_skeleton_03 said:
Oh you waved your hand and say "it isn't about that", I see that now.

So basically it wasn't addressed. You did bring her into the discussion. Fact.
I mentioned her name as an example of something someone could be perceived as supporting in order for any way they are treated to be considered "earned". The discussion is in no way about her. We are not discussing her. How much clearer can I make it? How many arguments with me devolve into somebody nitpicking about something completely unrelated to the point being made? My guess would be "all of them".
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
I mentioned her name as an example of something someone could be perceived as supporting in order for any way they are treated to be considered "earned". The discussion is in no way about her. We are not discussing her. How much clearer can I make it? How many arguments with me devolve into somebody nitpicking about something completely unrelated to the point being made? My guess would be "all of them".
So you brought her into this. You mentioned her name. You brought it up as an example of how you are oppressed for your view. By doing so you are saying: "like you support Trump, I support Sarkeesian". You drew a parallel to the two groups of people as a cry for attention or sympathy.

Don't say WE because you can't speak for WE. You can speak for you.

You are complaining about an argument with you devolving into nitpicking when you literally less than 24 hours nitpicked that you were human ....
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
a_skeleton_03 said:
So you brought her into this. You mentioned her name. You brought it up as an example of how you are oppressed for your view. By doing so you are saying: "like you support Trump, I support Sarkeesian". You drew a parallel to the two groups of people as a cry for attention or sympathy.

Don't say WE because you can't speak for WE. You can speak for you.

You are complaining about an argument with you devolving into nitpicking when you literally less than 24 hours nitpicked that you were human ....
I disagree.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
You bringing Anita into the conversation on Trump was you bringing it into another topic. It isn't up for debate, it isn't an opinion. It is what literally fucking happened.

You arguing points like this is one of the many reasons people see you as an obnoxious cunt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.