The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,860
8,266
The same way I live every other day.

Covered in money and female ejaculate. #patriarchy
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Fana: "was the white house an example of said columns? this is where you go full retard and pretend the two have no relation to each other. like would it not be fair game to point out if the white house was a bad example or misleading?"

Are you kidding here? YES, the White House is an apt example of architecture featuring ionic columns. YES, Hitman is an apt example of a video game featuring the "women as background decoration" trope.




Quaid: "Instead, the savvy Ms. Sarkeesian chose to play clips of what she was talking about to provide context to her words.
Tanoomba is trying to relieve her of the responsibility that she herself has placed on game developers. It's pretty fucking wild to watch."

I'm doing no such thing. Sark chose to have Hitman footage play in the background because it was an entirely appropriate example of a game featuring the trope she was talking about. It boggles my mind how difficult this is to grasp for some people. She could have used footage from any of the 25 other games that featured the same trope and her message would have been exactly the same. She wouldn't have had to change a single word. Have you tried my one-question quiz yet?
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,318
140,079
Fana: "was the white house an example of said columns? this is where you go full retard and pretend the two have no relation to each other. like would it not be fair game to point out if the white house was a bad example or misleading?"

Are you kidding here? YES, the White House is an apt example of architecture featuring ionic columns. YES, Hitman is an apt example of a video game featuring the "women as background decoration" trope.
then why do you get all titty twisted about people criticisizing anita's choice of example she communicated with her video?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Yeah, you are, and everyone sees it but you, because you are blind, stupid, and retarded.

She didn't just play Hitman clips in the background, she directly referenced the game's mechanics.

No matter how much you squirm or wriggle, we've got your ass dead to rights you cowardly little dickshitter.

Go fly a fucking kite into an electric wire.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Fana: "then why do you get all titty twisted about people criticisizing anita's choice of example she communicated with her video?"

I never got titty-twisted over people making any kind of criticism about Anita's choice of anything. I've seen a lot of fantastic criticism of Sarkeesian and I'm always looking for more.

What pinches my tits in self-righteous hypocrisy. When the need to portray someone as a villain overrides one's ability to look at an argument rationally, the Tanoomba signal soars high above the city skyline. The vast majority of things Sarkeesian is accused of "lying" about are not lies at all when you look at the available information objectively. That doesn't matter here, though, because many have committed so whole-heartedly to the narrative that Sark is a liar, fraud and con artist that they can't turn back now. They're at the point where being presented with evidence that contradicts their beliefs actually STRENGTHENS their resolve (there's a scientific name for that phenomenon but I forget it). On the other hand, when someone who's on their "side" makes statements that are far more easily proven to be lies, everyone turns a blind eye or rationalizes it away using weak-ass non-logic. If this were any other topic, there would be no disagreement that Sark's not actually talking "about Hitman". But because it suits the narrative, people are pretending words don't have meanings, they are discarding context as if it were Styrofoam packaging, and they are twisting the English language in nonsensical ways, all in an attempt to justify some guy's blatant lies, because he agrees with them. It's simultaneously hilarious and disheartening.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
"I never got titty-twisted over people making any kind of criticism about Anita's choice of anything."

"What pinches my tits in self-righteous hypocrisy."

trolllolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololollololololo lololollolololololololollolololololololollolololol olololollolololololololollolololololololollolololo lolololollolololololololollolololololololollololol ololololollolololololololollolololololololollololo lololololollolololololololollolololololololollolol olololololollolololololololollolololololololollolo lolololololollolololololololollolololololololollol ololololololollolololololololollolololololololollo lololololololollolololololololollololololololololl olololololololollolololololololollolololololololol lolololololololollolololololololollolololololololo llolololololololollolololololololollololololololol ollolololololololollolololololololollololololololo lollolololololololollolololololololollolololololol olollolololololololollolololololololollolololololo lolollolololololololollolololololololollololololol ololollolololololololollolololololololol
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
" The vast majority of things Sarkeesian is accused of "lying" about are not lies at all when you look at the available information objectively. "

But everything Thunderfoot says about her is a lie.

Gotcha.

You're retarded. Have we mentioned that lately?

Oh by the way, you are a villain.

". They're at the point where being presented with evidence that contradicts their beliefs actually STRENGTHENS their resolve "

Pure psychological projection here

"On the other hand, when someone who's on their "side" makes statements that are far more easily proven to be lies, everyone turns a blind eye or rationalizes it away using weak-ass non-logic.

More pure psychological projection

" If this were any other topic, there would be no disagreement that Sark's not actually talking "about Hitman"."

Clearly this is wrong because even people not invested in this topic like Chaos come in, ask you to prove your case, and you spill spaghetti everywhere and then everyone looks at you like the fucking retard you are.

"But because it suits the narrative, people are pretending words don't have meanings,"

More psychological projection, you're the retard who wants to redefine every term in a narrow way that only serves your viewpoint.

" and they are twisting the English language in nonsensical ways"

Yeah, that was totally us who spent a year arguing what the definition of encouraged is, and who couldn't grasp what the meaning of Poe's Law was, etc.

"all in an attempt to justify some guy's blatant lies, because he agrees with them"

More psychological projection. The only person doing this stuff is you in regards to Anita.

" It's simultaneously hilarious and disheartening."

Actually its just hilarious because you just keep doubling down further and further, diving further and further down the retard rabbit hole. You just can't help yourself at this point. Its pure psychological illness for you at this point.
 

Neki

Molten Core Raider
2,726
397
New thread title has me intrigued. Time to start reading through it to see if it lives up to its claim.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
But because it suits the narrative, people are pretending words don't have meanings, they are discarding context as if it were Styrofoam packaging, and they are twisting the English language in nonsensical ways, all in an attempt to justify some guy's blatant lies, because he agrees with them. It's simultaneously hilarious and disheartening.
What "narrative" dipshit? Everytime you find someone new that hasn't been involved in this, they see the video and walk away with the same impression. The only one stuck to a narrative is you.
 

Erronius

<WoW Guild Officer>
<Gold Donor>
17,331
44,990
Erronius: "Well, thanks for obliging me, I guess? I can see how this is going play out from here."

My pleasure, but if you will do me but one small indulgence, please take this one-question quiz and report to me when you're done:
http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.php?6488-GamerGate-A-Problematic-Debate&p=995851&viewfull=1#post995851

I eagerly await your answer.
Are you actually trying to trollbait me here, after I went out of my way to give you more leeway than anyone has probably given you in months?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
The answer to that question is "Yes", Er.

He has burnt his bridges with absolutely everyone on this forum. Why would he treat you any differently?
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Erronius, the more you try and be reasonable with him while still disagreeing, the madder and more obnoxious he gets towards you. It is what has turned off everyone who has made an effort to honestly debate him.

I know, I used to be a Tanoomba "partisan" and defended him quite often even when I disagreed with him. Now I'm apparently one of the most horrible people on earth according to Tanoomba.
frown.png
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
It really is like he wants to turn anyone who tries to be reasonable into an enemy, so he can claim that he too is being witchhunted because of an agenda or narrative or whatever other word salad he decides to describe it as.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
It really is like he wants to turn anyone who tries to be reasonable into an enemy, so he can claim that he too is being witchhunted because of an agenda or narrative or whatever other word salad he decides to describe it as.
Persecution complex.

Just like with all the Christians running to declare how persecuted they are when gays get to be married and a guy who describes himself as "not religious but spiritual" shoots up a school and they all declare him an atheist and then start hashtags and shit to flog themselves with an make themselves feel like special snowflakes.

It really is just all religious mindset meme viruses basically.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,318
140,079
The vast majority of things Sarkeesian is accused of "lying" about are not lies at all when you look at the available information objectively.
Oh I missed a part where you thought sarkeesian lied about something and was called out on it, you got an example? this would go a long way for me personally in seeing you as more balanced than I thought.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Erronius: "Are you actually trying to trollbait me here, after I went out of my way to give you more leeway than anyone has probably given you in months?"

Trollbait? No, sir. I am directly addressing the, frankly, somewhat silly notion that using X as an example of Y = talking "about X".
Heck, you didn't even answer the question. It wasn't a trick question. You have nothing to fear.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Fana: "Oh I missed a part where you thought sarkeesian lied about something and was called out on it, you got an example? this would go a long way for me personally in seeing you as more balanced than I thought."

You're going to need to proof-read that one a few more times before it becomes something I can remotely make sense of and respond to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.