Thor: Ragnarok (2017)

Well they already pulled a mind controlled Hulk in AoU. I really hope they don't let Loki sock puppet him like he did in the comics. Too soon.

Another dimension where both these powers go nuts without collateral damage would be a great 3 hour movie by itself. Popcorn incoming.

The argument that Thor beating destroyer is plot related is silly. ANYONE EVER BEATING ANYONE is ALWAYS plot related, otherwise why would it be important?

Secondly, vibranium isn't really that dense of a metal. The density isn't what makes it noteworthy, it's the unique ability of absorbing and redirecting kinetic energy. It could be as sense as balsa wood but if everything you throw at it bounces off we're gonna pay attention to it.

They don't show any footage, just descriptions and review.

http://www.slashfilm.com/thor-ragnar...adiator-armor/

There is a lot going on in this movie right now.

The footage screened had Hulk launching himself at Surtur, and Fenris Wolf was also in one of the shots.

I wish there was a copy of that footage online somewhere.

It's because it looks fucking cool. Fashion souls> ALL

I want to see him swing the sword/axe and have the haft just snap from the force through the air.

Big Phoenix_sl said:

Why does the hulk need a melee weapon? Aren't his fists basically unstoppable forces?

Click to expand...

Well in planet hulk he isn't at his full strength after going through the portal

Column_sl said:

There is a lot going on in this movie right now.

The footage screened had Hulk launching himself at Surtur, and Fenris Wolf was also in one of the shots.

Click to expand...

shit. I read that as Surfer.

Xenrauk_sl said:

http://www.slashfilm.com/thor-ragnar...adiator-armor/

Click to expand...

Why would a CGI hulk need real world props?

For scanning into the renderer?

Or for non CGI characters to interact with