Search results

Yep. Either he really doesn't believe that Hitman fits, or he is the biggest pedantic douchenozzle in the history of pedantic douchenozzles. Wait, that is a false dichotomy, he could be both I guess.

That wasn't what I was talking about bro. Relax, just bustin your balls.

I loved Get Schwifty.

If we are going to go to the trouble to split it up into 3 threads, we should at least split the spoiler thread into AstroChuk and AstroChuk-free versions.

I think this thread shows the ultimate failure of the rickshaw as a punishment for truly unrepentant shitposters.

I thought Interstellar was good, but this is considerably better.

So Tanoomba says that the vast majority of the supposed lies that Anita is accused of lying about, are false. This of course implies that there is something she was accused of lying about and did lie. Fanaskin asks what Tanoomba thinks she lied about. Tanoomba says she didn't lie about...

It really is like he wants to turn anyone who tries to be reasonable into an enemy, so he can claim that he too is being witchhunted because of an agenda or narrative or whatever other word salad he decides to describe it as.

Erronius, the more you try and be reasonable with him while still disagreeing, the madder and more obnoxious he gets towards you. It is what has turned off everyone who has made an effort to honestly debate him. I know, I used to be a Tanoomba "partisan" and defended him quite often even when...

Yeah, none of my friends or I ever watch a movie in 3d. I am always surprised that anyone does, the experience has never added anything to a movie. Yet, every new movie thread, we have person after person say they watched it in 3d. I just don't get it.

What "narrative" dipshit? Everytime you find someone new that hasn't been involved in this, they see the video and walk away with the same impression. The only one stuck to a narrative is you.

This is from a few pages after his "columns" post. He keeps saying endlessly that she wasn't talking about Hitman. But then has a post like this, where he says, if she was, she would have been correct. The dude is a fucking a moron. If what she is saying matches Hitman perfectly...

She listed 25 games and claimed they were part of the trope, lets not pretend that those 25 games actually matched the trope.

Well yeah, he does actually seem to believe that. One of these days I am hoping he grows enough self-criticism to see the absurdity of it.

Seriously though, Tanoomba, everyone who sees this anew sides against you here. You had this exact same thing with Chaos and now Erronius, after you had the exact same thing with Quaid, and before that you had it with many of us. Why do all these people, from many diverse backgrounds and who...

Time and time again, when this topic gets introduced to an interested 3rd party, they rule against Tanoomba. Yet he steadfastly accuses everyone who sees it that way as engaged in a witchhunt. Absurdity.

I don't think so, I think he legitimately believes it.

The hilarious part is whenever he finds a "new" victim that kinda believes him for a bit, like Chaos a few months ago. Who then goes and watches the video and is all "wtf, she is clearly talking about Hitman".

huh?

Wow, what an absolutely original take from you. Absolutely no one would have guessed that your response to a Stewart video was that all of his criticism was "legitimate" based on you agreeing with it. Also, no one would have figured that you would take an interview to defend his criticism and...

Jesus, I can't even find his delusional stupidity funny anymore. His complete inability to see anything outside of his self-righteous bubble is just, as quaid put it, starting to just be hateful.

How can you jump into this thread and attack Hodj, while Furry has sidetracked pretty much any talk of QM everytime it is brought up? Come on bro.

Yes, it says they made a mistake with the ending and wanted to fix it. Doesn't really say much beyond that, other than showing that no matter what you do, once the internet has a meme of the ending ruining your life, some people will keep rolling with it.

Nah, at that point it is on you. Especially after they put out the extended cut.

The game was awesome, the multiplayer alone made it great. Being buttmad and letting a 10 minute ending ruin a trilogy for you is silly.

Definitely don't agree with this. I think I enjoyed the second read even more. Yeah, this book just screamed adaptation.

Tell us more about how every single situation ever brought up is yet more evidence of how poor Anita is witchhunted. Maybe it will convince someone this time.

Column

Sheesh, just got back from my class and I've totally lost track of wtf is going on. Uncle.

Tuco, stop bending over backwards to defend this guy.

Based off feels. You find it uncomfortable, therefore it doesn't exist. The universe doesn't owe you anything in making all of its ideas fit inside your gray matter.

Great conversation about the irrational nature of physics between Max Tegmark and Sam harris that is very applicable to this discussion. http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/t...ou-you-you-you As for Furry's argument, pretty sure he used the argument of not being able to see negative...

Tuco, I really think you missed his rant against negative numbers in equations.

Wanting Zimmerman to live for a week with a black family "as punishment". Doubting the Moon Landing Doubting the "official story" of 9/11 Doubling down on solar roadways Defending one beer and having sex makes you a rapist She wasn't talking about Hitman, but everything she said...

Careful Lithose, he might accuse you of some random mental illness with no connection to what you just said.

I no longer believe that Tanoomba is a teacher. I think he was taking an english as a second language class, decided to embellish. Either that, or he is this teacher in the flesh... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnlrK14OZn0

How does bringing up the moon landing make someone a narcissist? How the fuck can an english as a second language teacher be so bad at definitions?

Plus, that assumes that each of the harassing tweets is from a separate person.

Cad, you are of course 100% right. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA0aKjY8K50 If you see everything as sexist, everything as racist, then everything is harassment to you. You just straight up aren't rational if you think that definition of harassment is useful or possible as a society.

I dunno if it more sad or hilarious that Tanoomba ends up forced to defend such silly positions so often. Defending pretty much any definition of "legitimate criticism" should be toxic to free speech in a society. Yet here is Tanoomba, hoisting himself up by his own petard on that cross.