Search results

Oh they got me good with their below the real article abstract. I actually found the same statistic like ten seconds ago.

dontbanmebro

lolwut

Every line of that trailer is terrible. It doesn't help that the book stars a bunch of dumb kids so there's no avoiding that shit but even the grown-ups are phoning it in. If those are the best takes they had, I'm pretty sure this is going to be fucking horrible (despite all the lazerzzz)...

Your status says fat and happy, but I don't believe it.

Take that, moon. Right in your big dumb round face.

Does anyone else like to think of the moon missions as the Earth bukkaking the Moon? Cause I do.

Wait, do we not let the crazies vote?

Seriously though I give up. Say anything you want hodj. I won't post in this thread anymore.

So what? What difference does it make if I was there that night or two days later? What if I just been on a coke binge or something? Would responding to your post then still be "shoehorning?" Again, moronic. dumbdumbdumbdumbdumb

Seconded.

THAT WAS ALREADY THE DISCUSSION DUMBDUMB True, not the discussion on that day, but I had several days of shit I was looking through. That's not me "shoe-horning" it in. You're a moron.

You do realize that I wasn't able to post until the 26th, right?

Why would I cry about you being fucking retarded? I'm seriously sitting here laughing. You're great dude. A WHOLE TWO DAYS LATER OHHHHH SHHHIIIIIIIIIIIIII lol

dun dun DUNNNNNN lol Jesus dude are you serious?

Hey asshole, look what I'm responding to there and look what that's a response to.

Show me the post where I shoehorned it in. Link it to me.

Do you know what the details are about who owns the ditch after it gets dug?

Nothing seems to be your responsiblity. You don't explain the details of your hypothetical and you don't have to because you "win." Good job, buddy. You're posting at the same rate that I am. How am I bullying you? What are you talking about? Sorry that a socialist analysis happens to hit a...

I don't see it. It is if those leaders get substantial material perks. There's an occasional nugget of not totally stupid when you're feeling less petulant. It seems like as things grind on you start stamping your feet and basically insisting that I agree with you. At THAT point I say...

No you haven't. Well sort of. They were already in what sounds like a deeply unequal society and that played itself out in the distribution of results. They're slaves, but not because they worked for someone who worked as an organizer. lol well it happens to matter in terms of the mapping back...

It takes two to tango, dickbreath.

I've already pointed out why the analogy doesn't map properly. No dumbdumb. The point is about whether or not they own the product of their labor. What are the rules afterward for control over that ditch? "Benefited from" is not fucking at all what we're talking about here. Sort of. If...

The discussion about public schools hit some derail on some subpoint about what other countries do with their schools I think and that led into whether or not China was a "developed" country and then communism/not communism and now anti-capitalism. edit:// also a bunch of stuff about what...

How were they working "for" the chief? He didn't keep the product of their labor (except as it interacted with his own land). In a proper analogy, the chief would agree to show them how to set up agriculture, but he'd then own the fields they tended. But of course, that doesn't make your...

Yeah it's amazing how leaving out quid-pro-quo arrangements for survival needs and begging the question about the virtue of the person doing the organizing makes things look a lot less exploitative. Weird.

The unethical way they intend to use it.

Labor is the act of creating value. How that value gets allocated after the fact is a question of ethics power*. How it OUGHT to be allocated after the fact is a question of ethics. How is that not exactly the claim that you're making? You want me to provide a citation that the Chinese...

I'm just showing that it's possible. I mean those systems got up and running for at least a few years before they were destroyed by wholly external forces. The claim I was responding to was one of impossibility. I kinda doubt humans were really free then. Unfreedom predates our species...

Huh? Oh I see...they're not sufficiently virtuous. That's why they can't afford to start a business. lol They accept it at gunpoint.

It has nothing to do with "how well they did." They organized free societies in a revolutiony manner. It has to do with freedom, not material development. That matters too, but that's not what I'm talking about. If the Soviet Union had done great economically it would still be an unfree...

Replace money with wealth then, dickhead. It doesn't just appear from nowhere. Yeah most people have the financial requirements to start a business but just don't feel like it. lol Jesus dude. LOL You're ridiculous. So your claim is that their system isn't inflicted because the Chinese...

Don't you have another bombing to plan?

It really really isn't. I'm not talking about Marx or surplus-value theory. If I am, it's incidental. Saying "surplus-labor value theory is discredited" is not good enough. Not at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Te..._%28Ukraine%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Catalonia

Right. That's because of the way that having money gives people power (and the way that having power gives people money). That's not a justification for anything and it really has nothing to do with division of labor. Division of labor is a consequence, not a cause. It really is. You're...

It's really not. Frankly this claim reveals adeepignorance about the history surrounding that event. The argument I made is one that was made by communists living in Russia at the time of the revolution. It has nothing to do with how shit worked out. The Russian revolution was fundamentally...

I explicitly talked about the moral implications of the parameters that are involved with societies that have fundamentally slave-like characteristics.

There's nothing about leadership, organizational and other roles that obligates that there be a class of people who earn money by charging others rent, interest, or profit. One thing has absolutely nothing to do with the other. Because it's taken from the people who really produce it. Those...