Search results

Right-wingers really do have some amazing logic.

Shut up, American Inventorface.

If I've learned anything from this bombing, it's that we should be suspicious of Genndy Tartakovsky.

You already used that one today. edit:// ...you American Inventor.

Yeah that seems like a reasonable policy.

I mean I did get banned for not letting chaos win his dumbfuck "life begins at conception" argument in the abortion thread. I think I have good reason to be salty when dumb American Inventors like Noodleface get to say American Inventor with impunity.

Fuck off, Kang.

Yeah can't we just go back to saying "American Inventor" and not getting banned for it? Also, I'd love some more rank conjecture if we could make that happen.

Actually that sort of talk will probably only come from the explicitly right-oriented media this time. They're white so their crimes won'tnecessarilybe linked to their being muslims.

Yeah that's kind of like...the whole fucking reason why we've ever heard of Chechnya. Calling them Russians when they've been bitterly fighting to escape Russian control since the days of Stalin (at least? my history isn't great here) is just completely fucking retarded.

That dude has some pretty sweet 13375p34|<

I agree. http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.p...l=1#post169794

I'd rather just complain and continue annoying you.

What a fucking cesspool this place is.

Is that true? Random? Yeah at this point it's essentially a fairly gorey spectator sport for everyone here. We just don't have information.

I don't give a shit about any of that. Aggression is a fucking war crime. "Well we didn't feel like treating them like a real government so we bombed them instead." Not even remotely good enough.

Hey dumdum: http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle26410.htm

They bad we good. Got it. It's irrelevant that they were basically begging us for evidence to turn over the person we had been demanding they turn over for three years and instead we bombed them?

Clearly. lol It might be, yeah. It's at least worth thinking about. Ideally I would prefer socialization of every industry along lines which give all stakeholders (which may exist at larger or smaller scopes depending on the the type and scale of the firm) equal democratic power over the...

http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle26410.htm

Yeah so they used Al Qaeda as muscle to enforce their shitty theocratic fiefdom. What does this have to do with them asking for evidence that Bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attacks? How did you go from that wiki text to the conclusion that "for all intents of purposes the September 11...

The democratic threat of being able to fire the people in charge at every level as levied by the stakeholders with at least a vote, if not a democratic process, that is unweighted by wealth and other forms of irrelevant and unjustified skew. Yeah a government is just like a business monopoly...

The second thing doesn't follow at all from the first, nor have you addressed the reasons I've already given for a preference of direct government action.

You're wasting your time. He's already decided the stupid shit he believes. edit:// And surprise surprise, it's his typical golden mean idiocy.

Oh and America has one of the worst records in the world when it comes to harboring terrorists, so that's also a fucking retarded line of thought.

If you think we would hand anyone over to Afghanistan without evidence, you're a fucking retard.

Yeah some time I'll try to talk to him about the legitimacy of invading Afghanistan.

Try having a rational conversation with him about when life begins some time. He gets a dumbfuck idea in his head and then says whatever it takes to maintain his conclusion and then acts like I'm the one that's off the rails. He's fucking thought cancer.

Seriously, you're a fucking retard. Did you even read his link? Does anyone know why this mental midget is a moderator?

I'm not talking about people doing it on purpose.

Honestly I seriously doubt any more thought or research has gone into their opinion beyond "The war in Afghanistan was justified because of 9/11." Like that's literally 100% of it (and then it's not thought about again until some dickhead shows up in an internet thread).

No but they were just NEVER going to turn him over peacefully because you just know how THOSE PEOPLE like to stick together.

Uh huh. http://articles.baltimoresun.com/200...tan-food-drops http://www.comw.org/pda/0201strangevic.html#appendix1.1 Yeah, they bad we good. Got it. Actually everywhere else in the world that was the ONLY serious policy option: http://www.globalpolicy.org/componen...154/26553.html...

It was a fundamentally immoral choice and reducing the pointing out of that fact to "crying about it" means that you're human garbage.

What's the point of this discussion about extradition treaties? We didn't have one with Afghanistan. It doesn't follow from that that our only choice then was bombing the fuck out of people that can't even feed themselves.

How exactly would they have investigated the attacks of 9/11?

We would conduct our own investigation into what occurred here and we would go to whatever agency had jurisdiction (almost certainly through INTERPOL).Possiblywe might be allowed to send an investigative team into another country. In ALL cases, we would ask for whatever evidence the other...

I think that they absolutely would and that in the normal course of the investigative process that happens all the time.

You would hope that we would have our own investigation into a crime that occurred in another country? Think about what that would mean without the flip. You're saying that the Taliban should have come to the U.S. to do an investigation to see whether or not there was merit to our demand to...