Fair point.
As far as legality is concerned, I think this argument is quite over. It's pretty clear that a judge wants to see a severe level of intoxication to consider rape charges to be valid. It makes sense really. Having a sexual encounter is a deeply intimate and primal act that...
I love how none of them are the slightest bit concerned that a major international corporation is using people's personal politics to sell fucking cheeseburgers. I mean, it's certainly not the first instance of this, but it's definitely one of the most blatant.
Dude... You are missing the point.
We all know what a Cryosilk Robe is. Not only is the robe in that video not a rip-off of a Cryosilk robe... Nobody from Brad's team working on Pantheon designed or created it. That is a model produced by someone else, the rights to which you can purchase and...
Solid build. Not a single thing I would change. I'm team green though (for the time being, anyway) so I'd probably go with a GTX 780. The value is really high on those 290s right now though, so I understand the decision.
Mist... Nobody knows? Come on...
Short... Pale... Pretty straightedge and preachy... I'm guessing your avatar looks a lot like you (Catholic-Irish gingerish complexion/short haircut)...
People know.
Dude this is so silly on so many levels that it's making me laugh...
You don't have a 'safety meeting' before 'heading to the local with the guys'... Because you are a fucking guy. You are in no danger of being raped... That's why you don't take precautions against it. Unfortunately, women...
Mist... Not only are you a lesbian, you are also probably 35+ years old. The probability of you getting raped in the situation described above has been slim-to-nil for the last decade.
I think you are probably safe to have a fucking drink.
Well, to clarify then.
Why would you, Jais, take precautions to prevent something happening to you, that has no danger of happening to you? You are MAN NOT PREY, after all. Why does it make someone a less able individual if they choose to protect themselves from a danger that they themselves...
Interesting. What exactly is your problem with women taking reasonable precautions to being preyed upon? They are a less-able person because they have set up a fail safe system in case they become to intoxicated while they are ingesting a drug? Responsibility = stupidity to you?
We got a real...
Have you ever been preyed upon sexually? If it's not a danger for you, why would you take steps to protect yourself from it? Because people who ride bikes should wear bike helmets.... Does that mean everyone should be wearing bike helmets all the time?
You've never seen a sober friend take a...
...are you being sarcastic? Yes, a sober individual should be appointed to help their drunk friends make good decisions that keep them from harm while they are intoxicated.
Have you never done acid?
Well, I still find some of his stuff outside the pail ridiculous... But I've seen a particular brand of scumbag operate first-hand, so I have to agree that it is indeed possible to 'get someone drunk' through some skillful manipulation.
Still, there are precautions that could and should be...
*shrug* I've been around alcohol enough to know, down to the drink, when someone will tip from heavily buzzed into the land of 'oh shit I'm fucked'. I could easily see how I could use this knowledge to really manipulate a situation where a woman was already buzzed and feeling somewhat attracted...
What I'm saying is, that in that condition, she may not have the capacity to say 'No'. Is it then, rape? The accused 'rapist' never got rejected... She was conscious enough to fuck him (assuming that is the case).
It's tricky, and that's why it's used by evil twats.
I'm trying to wrap my head around what tanoombro means by 'getting' someone drunk... I've worked behind bars for many years and seen my share of shit.
There is a particular brand of manipulative evil dude out there. They'll intentionally seek out women who are already out having casual drinks...
This is absolutely right, btw.
Most women I know who are at all involved with current feminist thought would shit down your throat for some of the stuff you've been saying.
Why is nothing being done about this fucking spammer?
He has made the same off topic post twice in the same thread in the same day, and multiple times in other threads in the past.
Do any other animal species have advanced cultures with laws and social norms? Do any of you have insight into what's going on in the mind of a bonobo when he is confronted with a sexual rival?
You mentioned puritans. What we are talking about here probably goes as far back as the original sexual division of animals. It is not cultural.
Edit: okay, maybe not THAT far back heh
I don't find it 'difficult', but I certainly do notice when I have illogical, instinctual, emotional responses. I'm a very self aware individual.
I've actually never had a rage-out situation, despite plenty of provocation over the course of my life. I attribute this to my above mentioned self...
Well then let's call a spade a spade. It has nothing to do with cultural remnants from a less culturally evolved period, and has a lot to do with how we deal with our animalistic motivations conflicting with modern societal pressures.
Not really. I'm deriving my opinion from your number of sexual partners, your need to share that information when it was unsolicited, your lack of territorial aggression, and your need to share your supposed 'high' social status with us when it was totally irrelevant to the conversation.
It's hilarious that women actually believe THIS is why men don't want their partner to have had a large number of sexual partners. It couldn't be further from the mark.
It's as simple as the fact that men are territorial. It's fucking primal. If this were 10,000 years ago I would have bashed...
You must be satisfied with extremely low frame rates. There is no way you are playing modern games (battlefield 3, 4, tomb raider, Witcher 2, Blood Dragon) at anything more than 20-30 FPS on low settings.