Drones and Autonomous Aerospace

Borzak

Bronze Baron of the Realm
24,646
32,008
That device will be highly illegal if ever "implimented". You can not interfere with a radio signal with active means and the FCC frowns on it highly.

The FAA has a deal before them now to require a license for all "drones" including small RC types and you must have your license number visible on the "drone" at all times and cap it at 55 pounds which apparently came in via the AMA. It's pretty much a clusterfuck now.

Obviously they will have a different set of rules and license for those that are for profit much like the FCC.
 

Sylas

<Bronze Donator>
3,112
2,714
that was more of a "people are already thinking of ways to disable drones" rather than a "boom headshot, amazon don't even bother to roll this out"
 

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,322
The skies will be the new wild west, birds will be the injuns.
Legal question: if someone on my property jumps, can I shoot/rob them?
 

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
27,675
32,717
I will train hawks to rip drones from the sky. Amazon will have to start building drones that look like vehicles from Mad Max.
 

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
Bisi, we already have the technology. No birdfeed necessary.

rrr_img_117598.jpg
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,854
137,953
The article I read was saying the US gov has a bug up its butt about drones going out of line of sight of an operator, amazon had to move it's testing to canada cause they were getting shit about it, hurts the prospect of amazon air, they want drones to fly pre approved flight corridors too right now.
 

Nester

Vyemm Raider
4,930
3,130
Canada has the same line of site restrictions currently. It is one of the main limiting factors of this tech.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
don't forget that from a cost and profit standpoint, amazon will charge about 100 bucks to have your pair of sneakers drone delivered
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,441
2,223
don't forget that from a cost and profit standpoint, amazon will charge about 100 bucks to have your pair of sneakers drone delivered
What is this based on? Or are you just making up numbers?
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
I'm just making up numbers, but the logic is that shipping rates for amazon are pure profit. This initiative of drone delivery is -not- a cheap one. Without amazon prime, amazon delivery prices are inflated. Not on everything, but on an awful lot of things -- they get you in the cost of shipping. Over the years, and recently for christmas shopping, it's not entirely uncommon to find items where the shipping is 50%+ of the total cost. That drive Prime sales more than their television and movie selection, I think.

So you've got a novelty delivery system like this, and it's one that isn't going to be cheap to maintain and R/D in the first place. Amazon ain't gonna eat that cost.

Drone delivery will be expensive. But maybe it will be reasonable with a Prime membership. They've got to find that line where people are willing to actually use it. They've also got guys in offices whose job it is to scientifically derive that line. Probably unavailable without one -- so why should I care.

I still think it's just goofy. It's a neatidea, I'll give it that. I don't see how it's practical for most commerce. But I ain't amazon, and amazon seems to think it is practical for enough commerce to be worth exploring.
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,441
2,223
I don't think Amazon would be pursuing this for novelty purposes. I'm betting that once the R&D is finished they're thinking it's going to be a lot cheaper than a teamster in a truck or they wouldn't be bothering with it.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
Yeah, that could very well be. It probably is.

That's where you get into the security of the system though, and the costs involved which amazon will not pay. They have to pay those security costs with the teamster. With drone delivery I see it being pushed onto the taxpayer.
 

CaughtCross

Vyemm Raider
2,717
4,258
Amazon is going tocrowdsource some last mile services.(And I assume this will be the method for packages too larger for drones). Because, as Picasso said, that is the expensive part of delivery. Essentially UPS/Fed Ex will deliver to their depots and transport between depots; then any package that doesn't make it out during the cheapest delivery times (IE that can't be bundled on a big route ect), will get flexed out...They can afford to be generous to the flex drivers too, because supposedly these "extras" or "immediate delivery" (Can't wait for the big bundle tomorrow OR you've paid extra for immediate delivery") are the really expensive part of delivery rates.
They did a pilot for the crowdsourced delivery in LA earlier this year. It was horrible, lost something like 3 packages, amazon is unable to track it well and had no idea where my stuff was at all. Other people I knew had problems as well.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
They did a pilot for the crowdsourced delivery in LA earlier this year. It was horrible, lost something like 3 packages, amazon is unable to track it well and had no idea where my stuff was at all. Other people I knew had problems as well.
Because of shit like this, Picasso.

that's not a kink in the system, that's a basic flaw. You don't think that will increase the burden on the police and court systems? Amazon half-assing it and then when their shit inevitably gets stolen they don't have the teamsters union of truckers to negotiate rates with. That's a security cost. Those thieving teamsters have a vested interest in not skimming too much. What Amazon will have instead is a detective who they say, "Please to go find our stuff." to.

I'm not considering the case where there is no administrative incompetence, no property theft, no technical failures. If you stipulate perfect conditions then a perfect result should not be surprising. I would like to consider the case where things go wrong. What happens in that case, where things go wrong? Well -- amazon loses profit and property, and we send police out on snipe hunts. Compare that to the delivery driver stealing. Amazon still loses profit and property but they are able to recoup some of that loss through that middleman of that trucker, and we send the police out on snipe hunts. That's a different security cost. c/2 tends to be a larger number than c/3.

Now add on the fact that the delivery system is only practical for high value items. This is basically a delivery system for electronics because of the weight restrictions. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if people started to steal the drones themselves for parts.

So yeah, there are problems. The system is fundamentally less secure. How could it not be? You could make the drone itself out of one giant camera and GPS tracker and it would still be less secure than a human agent with an incentive to not steal. The system will still work -- but it will work because we have a police force, which amazon does not pay for, which will compensate for that lack of security.

The sky won't fall. Amazon is cutting a corner.
 

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,322
So a guy driving a truck, stopping 1000 times a day with no doors, leaving shit on people's front fucking doorstep on a daily routine is less secure than an automated drone flying 50mph at 400 ft with no stops to the target, dropping shit off wherever they set down a pad presumably at the timing whim of the orderer?

The notion itself is shit but then to say it's going to shift security to the taxpayer because the cops recoup so many stolen packages that amazon gets some of that back?
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
44,660
93,334
That device will be highly illegal if ever "implimented". You can not interfere with a radio signal with active means and the FCC frowns on it highly.

The FAA has a deal before them now to require a license for all "drones" including small RC types and you must have your license number visible on the "drone" at all times and cap it at 55 pounds which apparently came in via the AMA. It's pretty much a clusterfuck now.

Obviously they will have a different set of rules and license for those that are for profit much like the FCC.
You think law enforcement agencies get permission from the fcc to setup stingrays? Laws are for little people.

I personally don't see drone delivery working out for basic home delivery applications. To little range, to little payload and a million variables to Fuck it up.