I hope you're right about the PvP. I know there was something from Smedley about PvP being in the design from the ground-up, but that was before they reset the game. The most recent credible thing I have seen is an indication that the PvP won't be open.
Hmmmm IIRC Feerott Spectres gave xp until at least the mid 40s... maybe all the way to 50.
Hmmm, just when my tears were welling up....bad design decisions indeed.I hope you're right about the PvP. I know there was something from Smedley about PvP being in the design from the ground-up, but that was before they reset the game. The most recent credible thing I have seen is an indication that the PvP won't be open.
There is actually some info floating around on EQN...PvP isn't some of that info. I'm more likely to think it will be contested areas. Why? Bc a large number of SoE player base are PvE folks. To force them into pvp would only make them not play.
yup this is a good post
LMAO. Asif I'd ever goto draegan to deal with a pathetic loser like you. You are such a wierdo you are private messaging me right now trying to start conversation with me while I tell you to fuck off. Then you post in this thread like you are some hero. All you have to do is look at your nets to see how many people value your posting.
I'm not trying to start a conversation, I was just prodding for info. But I am decided now anyway, your posts sound like they come from a 13 year old kid and I'm pretty sure that's what you are. When you aren't insulting me, you are usually insulting someone else. I am pretty sure you never played EQ because you just weren't old enough. Maybe you tried it recently to see what the fuss is about, not sure on that yet. But most of your posts are terrible. Like I said, you are the worst poster on this whole site. Maybe Itzena but at least he/she doesn't post very much.
You already did, starting on your little 9 year olds tantrum at me. And my flip outs are always the same, I just insult people, like you are doing to me. The only difference is, Draegan is a fucking biased faggot.
Uh not seeing how that's an indication that PVP won't be open? Was a simple question, non-consensual pvp or no? and the answer was "we're not saying, but it'll be fine". If anything, that's indicative that PVP will be open world. If it wasn't, the answer would have been a much more straight forward "No non-consensual pvp"I hope you're right about the PvP. I know there was something from Smedley about PvP being in the design from the ground-up, but that was before they reset the game. The most recent credible thing I have seen is an indication that the PvP won't be open.
Second bit was different. Isn't it time you grew out of this rustling meme? It makes you sound stupid.
Let's just all pray they keep PvP and PvE two completely separate things. Any MMO that has PVE skills being used for PvP will always fail as a PvP game.
So you say you need community and socializing to be important, then say I should form a group and steal everyone else's mobs? Way to be a hypocrite. Plus how the hell do you pull mobs at a faster pace when the place is on lockdown and things die as fast as they spawn? The whole point is there weren't enough mobs to go around. Holy fuck Your arguments make no sense.
Spectres were always camped by solo players on one of the soloing classes and pointless if you're 50 anyways
Btw, we true classic EQ PvPers don't feel left out in the cold about a "just put PvP on a server and leave it that way" rule set by any means. We don't want battlegrounds added, we don't want arenas added, we don't want special gear sets added. We want open world PvP enabled and item loot.
The second part of the response wasn't "it'll be fine," it was "we avoid bad design decisions." On their face they have similar meanings, but in context of the question the implication is obviously that he considers non-consent PvP a bad design decision. It still leaves plenty of options on the table: different kinds of servers, flagging yourself for PvP, areas that are designated PvP areas, etc. However, it's a safe bet that the ability to attack any player at any time is not the default in EQN.
Exactly. This is what I was trying to get at earlier. Don't try and "cater to the PvP crowd" by giving us special loot for PvP or trying to balance the classes for PvP. Just give us our own server with the PvP switch turned on.
meh, I completely disagree with you say is an obvious implication. Doesn't fit from what has been revealed thus far: The game is supposed to be the biggest sandbox ever. Sandbox is only meaningful with open world pvp. Developers agree completely with that statement. I believe the person who asked the question believes it's a bad design decision (it isn't), and the developers gave an answer that that person could misconstrue as validating their opinion. It's far more telling that every single response to that question was "wait and see" and "it's going to be fine." If the answer was no, it would have set a great deal of former EQ players mind at ease by simply stating as such, yet they refused to do so.
