Everquest Legends

Old Man Potter · 2026-09-16T14:20:32-0400

moonarchia said:
The people who wanted more grind and things like forced grouping left EQL last month. Those guys are definitely going to give MNM a try.

What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

mkopec · 2026-09-16T15:30:26-0400

Old Man Potter said:
What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

Its a figure of speech, dummy.

moonarchia · 2026-09-16T17:04:44-0400

Old Man Potter said:
What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

You must have not played OG EQ then. Some classes had literally no way to solo for xp, as in they got their assholes raped by green cons. It was what it was. Most games since then have had solo paths for everyone, but it wasn't always that way. You can look at Pantheon and MNM, the nu-old EQ clones, to see that sort of shitty game design on display.

Old Man Potter · 2026-09-16T17:34:07-0400

mkopec said:
Its a figure of speech, dummy.

Are you Moonarchia's forum laywer?

Forced grouping is not a figure of speech. It's a cheap slogan used by entitled carebear scrubs who lack the social skills to even form a group.

Besides, I wasn't talking to you bitch.

Old Man Potter · 2026-09-16T17:47:48-0400

moonarchia said:
You must have not played OG EQ then. Some classes had literally no way to solo for xp, as in they got their assholes raped by green cons. It was what it was. Most games since then have had solo paths for everyone, but it wasn't always that way. You can look at Pantheon and MNM, the nu-old EQ clones, to see that sort of shitty game design on display.

Largely true. Grouping was required for at least half of the 16 classes. I was disputing the forced nature.

moonarchia · 2026-09-16T17:56:37-0400

Old Man Potter said:
Largely true. Grouping was required for at least half of the 16 classes. I was disputing the forced nature.

Required is a direct synonym to forced.

Nester · 2026-09-16T20:37:07-0400

Old Man Potter said:
What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

Guess you never played a warrior during classic

kill one blue, bind up, sit for 5 min. Hope to pull a single with zero CC. die, look for a group

grouping was forced for the vast majority.

Tuco · 2026-09-16T21:03:07-0400

Old Man Potter said:
What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

I can assure you that as a low level warrior, whenever sergeant slate caught me grinding light blue con spiders in the commonlands and then sitting for half an hour to regen, he picked me up and forced me in a group with a healer.

reavor · 2026-09-16T22:00:14-0400

Old Man Potter said:
What do you mean by forced grouping?

Nobody has ever been forced to group in a MMORPG. Grouping happened because it made sense to band together and create group/class synergy. Grouping was incentivized because grouping is the default design consideration.

oh come on dont be so obtuse. Yeah you didnt have to group, but then there was no way you were going to ever see any high end content or get any gear without a group but you werent FORCED to

TheBeagle · 2026-09-16T22:11:06-0400

I don't think light blue cons were even a thing yet in the earliest days of trying to solo. Just greens and blues. Or am I misremembering that? I soloed a good chunk of my Ranger to 60 fear kiting animals when I couldnt get in a decent group. That was not amazing but it got the job done. Warriors especially had almost zero tools to do anything solo though. I remember running into some poor bastard in SOL B once trying to do spiders solo as a warrior and we teamed up and actually did pretty decent as a rng/war duo compared to trying to solo our way through it.

Araxen · 2026-09-16T22:13:28-0400

TheBeagle said:
I don't think light blue cons were even a thing yet in the earliest days of trying to solo. Just greens and blues. Or am I misremembering that? I soloed a good chunk of my Ranger to 60 fear kiting animals when I couldnt get in a decent group. That was not amazing but it got the job done. Warriors especially had almost zero tools to do anything solo though. I remember running into some poor bastard in SOL B once trying to do spiders solo as a warrior and we teamed up and actually did pretty decent as a rng/war duo compared to trying to solo our way through it.

Light blues didn't become a thing till like SOL maybe or the very tail end of SOV.

Search

Everquest Legends

Old Man Potter

Trakanon Raider

mkopec

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord

Old Man Potter

Trakanon Raider

Old Man Potter

Trakanon Raider

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord

Nester

Ahn'Qiraj Raider

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!

reavor

I'm With HER ♀

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor

Araxen

Golden Baronet of the Realm