Everquest Legends

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord
<Bronze Donator>
30,811
60,812
I think the more honest framing is: "Yes, XP pots are technically a form of P2W because they monetize progression acceleration. However, on a mostly solo, instanced server, the actual impact on other players is probably pretty small." That's a coherent position.

But trying to argue that monetized progression acceleration somehow stops being P2W entirely because the server is casual-friendly just feels like twisting definitions to avoid a label people don't like. The only reason people mentally separate XP boosts from P2W now is because the industry normalized them over the last 15+ years.

At the end of the day, server design changes the severity of the impact, but it doesn't erase the mechanic itself.
It's the definition of winning that causes it to be a variable. There is no actual 'win' condition on a solo server. You are not in competition for anything with anyone else. There is no tangible benefit from reaching max level or anything before others. It's like using nitro on an empty racetrack.
 

Mrniceguy

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,045
572
Every decision I've seen made appears to be to make the solo game as long and as grindy as possible.. This is the anti casual server.. Im tryna make the game better but there are so many dick eaters in chat

No shit that's we've been trying to tell you. Secrets is a tranny retard that got fired from his last job because he couldn't stop playing games at work, he doesn't understand what made THJ popular. He is designing the game from the perspective of someone who sits at their comp 12 hours a day playing games and can't get along with others. Than you got Daybreak's lawyers pushing as many MTX into the game as possible and than you have heavy handed moderation banning people for not going along with group think. There is zero chance this is anything but trash.
 

xmod2

<Gold Donor>
841
1,296
It's the definition of winning that causes it to be a variable. There is no actual 'win' condition on a solo server. You are not in competition for anything with anyone else. There is no tangible benefit from reaching max level or anything before others. It's like using nitro on an empty racetrack.
That doesn't matter though, the conversation was about 'are xp pots pay to win'. Getting hung up on the definition of 'winning' is missing the point. People against pay to win usually are concerned with any way to influence player power through external, additional payment.

It's easy, for a given duration D, does the cash shop item change the outcome of two perfectly spherical, frictionless ideal players who are playing at the same level? If yes, then it is paying for player power, ergo pay to win. At that point, you are arguing over differing degrees of 'how bad it is', but the seal has been broken.

I don't know why this is such an argument here. EQ is an old game that has been p2w for a long time and it is fully embraced and utilized by the current playing population across the board. EQL will continue that legacy.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Pharone

Trakanon Raider
1,518
1,375
Not even remotely close to true when it comes to expansion launch races in EQ.
I'm just going to put this out there ...

I COULDN'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT WHO BEATS CONTENT FIRST.

Seriously. It's one of the stupidest fucking epeen things I have ever seen in the gaming industry.

These are games. GAMES. G A M E S!!!! The whole point of a GAME is to have FUN.

If that fun for you is being the first to beat something, then good for you. It does not mean that the game has to be designed in such away to enforce your desired form of "FUN" by making "racing to finish content" the main goal of the game's design.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 users

Pharone

Trakanon Raider
1,518
1,375
From what I have heard so far this is meant to be a solo server. Your personal enjoyment is the only thing that matters. There's no competition other than what you and whoever you want to compete with make up. If tradeskills and baz are useful, great. They probably aren't going to be required, but the social component for solo/casual friendly servers is mostly just chat.

What is the actual game advantage in a game where everyone is going to be able to get to cap and grind out their AAs in short order? Getting to the end game faster just means you reach the end sooner. A little extra gold from baz as everyone else reaches where you are in a few hours/days doesn't really move the needle.

There might be some soul eroding farms like the dodge/block/shielding augs off Kerafyrm on THJ. Getting to that a day or two sooner isn't going to make a lick of difference.

XP pots in eq are just a convenience. Personally, I put that in the QOL corner, and not the power corner. If they are totally unbalanced and somehow allow people to interfere with my private instances, that would be a different story.

However it turns out, I hope we all get to play soon.
It's designed as a solo-able experience with full game consumption including raid content falling under that umbrella of accomplishable goals.

In practice, I have heard people saying that people DO group up in game though simply because it is a social game.

While the game is truly solo-able, there's something to be said about having different builds that fill a specific role and grouping/raiding with others that do the same thing to fill different roles as well. For instance, you could make one hell of a healer support class character by mixing Cleric/Enchanter/Bard. It wouldn't be a great solo build, but it would be the superman version of a healer/support role character. Put that in a group with someone that has built out the ultimate warrior build and another that has built out the king of all DPS build, and you start to see where an EQL group/raid force can be quite impressive given the right builds and players.
 

xmod2

<Gold Donor>
841
1,296
I'm just going to put this out there ...

I COULDN'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT WHO BEATS CONTENT FIRST.
Who are you arguing with little bro? Bragging rights / showing off progression has always been a part of MMOs since standing in town in cool looking armor was a thing. What games (outside of WoW hall of fame) even have 'racing to finish content' as some kind of game enforced 'fun'? You're yelling at clouds.

For instance, you could make one hell of a healer support class character by mixing Cleric/Enchanter/Bard. It wouldn't be a great solo build, but it would be the superman version of a healer/support role character.
CLR/ENC/BRD was one of the most powerful builds in THJ. Leveraging insane ENC mana regen AAs and dopplegangers alongside BRD DDD spam and CLR specific armor/proc weapons.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord
<Bronze Donator>
30,811
60,812
That doesn't matter though, the conversation was about 'are xp pots pay to win'. Getting hung up on the definition of 'winning' is missing the point. People against pay to win usually are concerned with any way to influence player power through external, additional payment.

It's easy, for a given duration D, does the cash shop item change the outcome of two perfectly spherical, frictionless ideal players who are playing at the same level? If yes, then it is paying for player power, ergo pay to win. At that point, you are arguing over differing degrees of 'how bad it is', but the seal has been broken.

I don't know why this is such an argument here. EQ is an old game that has been p2w for a long time and it is fully embraced and utilized by the current playing population across the board. EQL will continue that legacy.
Sorry, but win is part of the word, so how it is defined is extremely salient to the conversation. That is something that differs from server to server. For servers where there is no competition there is no win or loss condition.
 

xmod2

<Gold Donor>
841
1,296
Getting hung up on the definition of 'winning' is missing the point.
Is it your contention that if the cash shop offered fully leveled characters with every class/race unlocked and sold raid gear directly for daybreak bucks, that wouldn't classify as pay to win because there is no way to win on the server?

You can believe that but at that point your definition of the terms is so at odds with what people mean colloquially that it's pointless for anyone to discuss things with you.
 

Pharone

Trakanon Raider
1,518
1,375
Who are you arguing with little bro? Bragging rights / showing off progression has always been a part of MMOs since standing in town in cool looking armor was a thing. What games (outside of WoW hall of fame) even have 'racing to finish content' as some kind of game enforced 'fun'? You're yelling at clouds.
Probably the case, but those fucking clouds keep looking at me funny!


CLR/ENC/BRD was one of the most powerful builds in THJ. Leveraging insane ENC mana regen AAs and dopplegangers alongside BRD DDD spam and CLR specific armor/proc weapons.
Yeah. I can see this being pretty fun trying to come up "ultimate" versions of character builds to fit specific roles. The fact that you have to level up each class from level 10 gives me mroe reason for replay as well because if I want to have multiple builds, I need to put the time in to getting the right classes to max level.

I see it as a really cool way to play an old game. I know it is going to irk the living fuck out of purest, but to me, fuck them. I want a fun game to play.
 

skylan

Trakanon Raider
172
187
I'm just going to put this out there ...

I COULDN'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT WHO BEATS CONTENT FIRST.

Seriously. It's one of the stupidest fucking epeen things I have ever seen in the gaming industry.

These are games. GAMES. G A M E S!!!! The whole point of a GAME is to have FUN.

If that fun for you is being the first to beat something, then good for you. It does not mean that the game has to be designed in such away to enforce your desired form of "FUN" by making "racing to finish content" the main goal of the game's design.

It doesn't matter what your definition of FUN is lol, these mongrel devs are ensuring that no form of it will exist beyond the relief of avoidance of more tedium by swiping your CC.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

xmod2

<Gold Donor>
841
1,296
Probably the case, but those fucking clouds keep looking at me funny!



Yeah. I can see this being pretty fun trying to come up "ultimate" versions of character builds to fit specific roles. The fact that you have to level up each class from level 10 gives me mroe reason for replay as well because if I want to have multiple builds, I need to put the time in to getting the right classes to max level.

I see it as a really cool way to play an old game. I know it is going to irk the living fuck out of purest, but to me, fuck them. I want a fun game to play.
You would have loved THJ. More the pity this temu version is the first exposure EQ fans are getting to the concept. With no alts and the need to do end game shit to unlock new classes, they've really limited the space of 'experimentation' people can do. You're locked into your first (and usually worst) decisions for a long time.

THJ had it where you had so many alts, they had to add 'grouping' options in the character select menu so you could categorize them. Another neat thing was an NPC that let you put your class selection up to fate and would server announce the three random classes you were assigned. Discord was always alive with people min maxing different builds and giving them names (mag/bst/nec pet cuck, etc) and discussing itemization and AA priorities. That spirit of experimentation feels lost with the seemingly arbitrary limitations being put in the game. Again, another reason THJ was so good was no daybreak meddling. No 'well we have to have long lockouts to increase player retention' horseshit. Just good game attracting good players.

God, I really hope this all bombs and DBG goes out of business and the IP is just abandoned so the community can pick up the slack.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Mrniceguy

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,045
572
It does not mean that the game has to be designed in such away to enforce your desired form of "FUN" by making "racing to finish content" the main goal of the game's design.

Never said that. Was just stating the reality of how TLPs work in terms of who "Wins" in that comment

But what i will say is

LONG grinds to max XP pot sales aren't my idea of fun.
7 Day lockout designed to timegate and keep you subbed aren't my idea of fun.
None of these designs are based off what's fun.
So i won't be playing this.

If those things are FUN to you congrats you're a retarded cuck. Enjoy your game made for retarded cucks.
 

Ridas

Pay to play forum
2,966
4,245
Roughly how high have you gotten? Are you having fun?
k1Mo8m.gif
 
  • 3Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 3 users

Burren

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,090
10,097
Never said that. Was just stating the reality of how TLPs work in terms of who "Wins" in that comment

But what i will say is

LONG grinds to max XP pot sales aren't my idea of fun.
7 Day lockout designed to timegate and keep you subbed aren't my idea of fun.
None of these designs are based off what's fun.
So i won't be playing this.

If those things are FUN to you congrats you're a retarded cuck. Enjoy your game made for retarded cucks.
That’s all you got? If someone has a different opinion than you, you just shit on them and throw insults?