Get a free Kyle Rittenhouse at Culver's

Lithose said:

You skipped my question...Naked girl grinding on you says no, do you fuck her anyway Chris? She was 'asking for it' right man?


Also, I might see where you're confused. He wasn't putting down rioters--plenty of people who rioted didn't get shot by Rittenhouse who were well within his range. He shot people ATTACKING him. See the difference?

Click to expand...

You are confused.

I keep saying that I fully support what Kyle did.

I'm commenting on what the Jury may think and what the law may be.

Chris said:

You are confused.

I keep saying that I fully support what Kyle did.

I'm commenting on what the Jury may think and what the law may be.

Click to expand...

but you DON'T support what he did because you keep pointing out how stupid he was for even being there.

Lanx said:

when kyle is free of all charges, he needs to take that bail money and move the fuck out of kenosha, b/c every cop and prosecuter is gonna try to give him a ticket for jay walking.

Click to expand...

he doesn't live in kenosha, remember HE ILLEGALLY CROSSED STATE LINES TO HUNT BLACK PEOPLE?!?!

j00t said:

but you DON'T support what he did because you keep pointing out how stupid he was for even being there.

Click to expand...

It's stupid to run into a burning building to save someone you don't know without equipment, it's still heroic.

Chris said:

It's stupid to run into a burning building to save someone you don't know without equipment, it's still heroic.

Click to expand...

Kyle had personal and professional relationships there and an ar15. He ran into a burning building where aquintances and friendoffriends lived with excellent unless you are araysar equipment.

Chris said:

It's stupid to run into a burning building to save someone you don't know without equipment, it's still heroic.

Click to expand...

no. it's stupid to wait for the fire to engulf the building before running in. Kyle was there to stop small fires from becoming big fires and minor injuries from becoming major ones.

that's the part you don't get. you are fundamentally misinterpreting why we are so behind kyle. that kid took a stand when very few others were. people were burning down his community and the authorities were actively waiting to do anything until AFTER the damage was done. Kyle was not.

j00t said:

no. it's stupid to wait for the fire to engulf the building before running in. Kyle was there to stop small fires from becoming big fires and minor injuries from becoming major ones.

that's the part you don't get. you are fundamentally misinterpreting why we are so behind kyle. that kid took a stand when very few others were. people were burning down his community and the authorities were actively waiting to do anything until AFTER the damage was done. Kyle was not.

Click to expand...

All the other less popular videos also frequently show him asking people if they need assistance or running with a fire extinguisher. Those idiotic looking gloves were obviously meant to signal he was looking to provide care to someone bleeding.

Kyle isn't just innocent. He is GOOD. A guilty verdict here is many steps worse than chauvin which was an abomination of a verdict itself. This one coming back guilty is a clear signal that not only can you not expect to get away with self defence, but you will be punished for right acts that defy the mob.

yerm said:

Kyle had personal and professional relationships there and an ar15. He ran into a burning building where aquintances and friendoffriends lived with excellent unless you are araysar equipment.

Click to expand...

He wasn't guarding his dad's house or the buisness he worked at though.

If he didn't have a gun I don't think he would have been in danger. Either people would have ignored him or he would have stayed away from the more dangerous situations.

It gave him a false sense of security (clearly it did not deter all of the thugs) and painted a target on his back (come and get your free rifle here!).

Again for the right wing SJWs, I 100% support what he did, I'm just commenting on why people (eg a Jury) may see things differently.

I would find him innocent, but I can see that some would say that he was needlessly asking for trouble, then it's only one step away from actually wanting trouble.

it was lawful for kyle to be there. it was lawful for kyle to have an AR-15. the end. that's the end of the debate. that's why the gun charge got thrown out. not a single jury member is voting on him having a gun or being in kenosha. the entire case is strictly about whether it was valid self defense. you've played your hand, you support kyle in word only. we all know it, stop trying to qualify your argument by saying you can see why someone might view it as a threat or an invitation. the only people who think that carrying a rifle is an invitation to come take it, are the people who instigated the attack and forced kyle to attack in self defense. your viewpoint PROVES it was self-defense.

He thinks the jury might. Which I think is insane unless facts are withheld from you. Your community is not just your house and your parents/friends house, it absolutely includes your neighbors. It's not just the literal building you work out of, its the shit around there too.

One of my best friends in EQ posted pictures of himself and some emt buds outside local shops in chicago doing very literally the same thing as the ar dudes in kenosha at a similar time. He wasnt outside of anywhere he worked; it was some bar I think. Its his community. You defend it.

The only way this jury doesnt find him innocent is lies or outside threats. Everyone, and I mean everyone, including fucking shitlibs, who I know has actually watched the video footage thinks he's innocent. The shitlibs are mad at the media for pretending black lives mattered in this case; not at kyle.