Girls who broke your heart thread
- Thread starter Aychamo BanBan
- Start date
I"m cool with polyamorous relationships, and if my fiance ever wanted to change things up and get with another girl one night, as long as he asked my permission and used protection, I"d be cool with that.
But if he went behind my back and did it like you are, Sharmai? I"d sure as shit dump him on the spot, because that"d make it pretty obvious that he doesn"t respect me in the slightest.
But if he went behind my back and did it like you are, Sharmai? I"d sure as shit dump him on the spot, because that"d make it pretty obvious that he doesn"t respect me in the slightest.
I disagree. Like I"ve said logic has made me very successful in my life so I"m not going to leave it behind the first time I encounter a situation where more disagree with me then don"t due to my own logic.Stoerm said:
Evelys.. Are you telling me its not possible to do what I am doing and not get caught? Ok the we will find out. I believe cheating is something nearly all marriages encounter at some point in their existence. I believe those marriages that survive cheating have found practical ways of dealing with it either at the time or before hand or the spouse never found out.
I"ve given all of you how I came to my decision 3 times now. Ignoring it and trying to convince me of your opinion isn"t likely to get any expected results.
LOL.aychamo_aycono said:
Now go back to being a bad doctor who can"t save his girlfriend from "dying".The Dictionary said:
Churchill please point to any line where I specifically said I did not care above the adverse consequences for others of ones actions?
It takes a special kind of ignorance to not make the connection that everything I did was for the sole purpose of considering the adverse consequences for other"s of my actions.
The entire point of the "mental gymnastics" that Storem refuses to read and work through is to ensure a long term and surviving marriage.
How many different ways have I said that and yet it is ignored.
Let me sum up the responses to me from everyone so far.
I don"t agree with your logic tl:dr LOLOLOL retard!!!$#(* Your a douche bag!!
You could all be republicans with that stellar display of convincing brain power.
It takes a special kind of ignorance to not make the connection that everything I did was for the sole purpose of considering the adverse consequences for other"s of my actions.
The entire point of the "mental gymnastics" that Storem refuses to read and work through is to ensure a long term and surviving marriage.
How many different ways have I said that and yet it is ignored.
Let me sum up the responses to me from everyone so far.
I don"t agree with your logic tl:dr LOLOLOL retard!!!$#(* Your a douche bag!!
You could all be republicans with that stellar display of convincing brain power.
Time to win the argument. I play -- THE HITLER CARD. To wit, Hitler"s "logical" resolution to "the Jewish problem". Logic was the basis of all decisions made, in that case. Logic without morality as it"s guide is monstrous. All non-sociopathic humans understand this concept instinctively.Sharmai said:
It would be logical to wipe out, or let starve, many poor communities on this planet. Logic doesn"t apply to human interactions, you fucking tool. Logically, we"d have selective breeding, and you"d never be born.
That said, you have presented no consistent logic. Even if you DID, you"d lose the argument before you started. Human relationships have nothing to do with logic. Only sociopaths don"t understand that.
It may be logical to cheat on your fiancee. She won"t see it that way, and again, you"re not ready to get married. Don"t do it. Be logical.
Here"s the logical argument you asked for: Getting off is getting off. There"s no reason to involve a second party. It"s called masturbation. You risking anything, however small, in order to involve a second person in an activity you can complete yourself is illogical. Involving a second person, at great personal and financial risk, in an activity you can accomplish by yourself is ludicrous. You"re not doing so out of logic. You"re doing so out of greed. GREED is logical, and you need to see your activities for what they are.
I assure you, the lunatics are not running the asylum. It"s not everyone else that"s crazy. You are not special, and have no unique insight. Hopefully at some time in the future something someone said in this thread will land home, and it will help avert a pending disaster. If not, shrug, we tried. I"m done with this conversation too, and I honestly wish you nothing but the best. Marriage is a bitch in the best of circumstances, and you"re not starting anywhere near there.
There"s really no arguing the "logic" of cheating. I called you emotionally immature because that"s what it takes to be your age and not realize that you aren"t a special snowflake who can logic cheating into being OK. Idiot.Sharmai said:
I"m saying that it doesn"t matter if you don"t get caught. If you are keeping something like this from your soon-to-be wife, you obviously do not respect her enough to make this relationship work, and your "logic" that you"ve used for your arguing has shown this. You think you"re being a great husband by providing things -- entertainment, financial support, etc, and you"re completely forgetting that honesty and trust are the foundations of a relationship.Sharmai said:
Your logic is flawed because you don"t understand what it means to be in a committed relationship at all. Your only thought is the "success" of the marriage and whether you are happy, not whether your soon-to-be wife is happy, nor have you shown any inkling that you even give a shit about her feelings in the slightest.
If you"re trying to debate love and relationships, you fail before you even started.Sharmai said:
- 6,338
- 7,144
Thank you for proving my point. By the way, I love this "can"t save his girlfriend" meme that"s spread by the anonymous retards here, considering she was in a different state at the time she died. Troll someone else, I won"t waste my time fighting with youChurchill said:
- 6,338
- 7,144
Don"t worry about Churchill and his calling you a sociopath. You aren"t. You"re just a dickheadSharmai said:
Sharmai"s a douchebag who"s managed to internally rationalize his own douchebaggery. You, on the other hand, are the most obtuse (or desperate -- probably both), human male I have ever come across.Ronaan said:
You"ve both taught me so much. Thank you.
- 1,896
- 17,183
fuck you go to downtown chicago and put up a black man in a relationship with a pregnant woman then if your still fucking alive come back and tell me that shit again.
It was a fucking KID that happens in normal relationships in the country all the damn time. We grew up this way and its life. Everyone cheats when their girl gets pregnant and you get up and keep going... It teaches you how to pimp them ho"s and stop being a bitch and raise some arrogant kid and other neccessary life shit. Mabye your plush meaningful relationships never had this kind of shit go down and thats all nice and well but if your going to put up a fucking KID IN THIS SITUATION what the fuck do you think is going to happen? A fucking apology? A slap on the wrist? Do you think we are going to give one fucking damn about you raising a kid like a normal adult male?
That kind of shit has DEEP FUCKING ROOTS dumbshit it does NOT go unnoticed
It was a fucking KID that happens in normal relationships in the country all the damn time. We grew up this way and its life. Everyone cheats when their girl gets pregnant and you get up and keep going... It teaches you how to pimp them ho"s and stop being a bitch and raise some arrogant kid and other neccessary life shit. Mabye your plush meaningful relationships never had this kind of shit go down and thats all nice and well but if your going to put up a fucking KID IN THIS SITUATION what the fuck do you think is going to happen? A fucking apology? A slap on the wrist? Do you think we are going to give one fucking damn about you raising a kid like a normal adult male?
That kind of shit has DEEP FUCKING ROOTS dumbshit it does NOT go unnoticed
- 6,338
- 7,144
I can"t tell if you"re for or against Sharmai. Wow. Where did you go to high school?OhSeven said:
Fucking what-the-fuck eh?aychamo_aycono said:
I think you meant "Which high school did you drop out of?"
- 6,338
- 7,144
Oh my god I just typed out like 2 pages on a fuckin iPod and the battery died and it all went away.
Maybe tomorrow I will retype at work. I have a long argument that ultimately concludes that cheating is bad, but I use most of sharmais own premises to do that. A few years ago I concluded that cheating was rational also, but after thinking more about I found the flaw in my argument. So uhh stay tuned at least sharmai. I also desire feedback on my reasoning.
Maybe tomorrow I will retype at work. I have a long argument that ultimately concludes that cheating is bad, but I use most of sharmais own premises to do that. A few years ago I concluded that cheating was rational also, but after thinking more about I found the flaw in my argument. So uhh stay tuned at least sharmai. I also desire feedback on my reasoning.
I can"t believe this got lost in the used up douchewater churning about. Yeah, Ronaan. That wasreeeeeaallyassholish of you.Ronaan said:
... What the hell, man?
Thanks. Sorry about the battery loss that sucks but I"m very interested in what you have to say.Dabamf said:
I"m not sure I even understand the logic behind Sharmai"s decision.
Is it that
A: There"s a 50% chance of marriage failure regardless, so you might as well enjoy the fruits of the potential X factor
B: By cheating once, now, the desire to cheat later is abated, and the chances of success of the marriage is increased
C: Odds of the marriage are somehow increased by doing the one thing that usually causes it to fail, in the same way that drinking poison increases one"s life span, or having sex with Amy Winehouse reduces your chance of catching an STD
D: Sharmai just escaped from Bellvue and is confusing the word "logic" with "fairyland dreams from meds"
I"m leaning towards D, but I"ll wait to hear a valid response.
The problem is that you have never once defined how you think the marriage is more likely to succeed based on your infidelity. You just say
Step 1 -> Infidelity ends marriages
Step 2 -> Infidelity
Step 3 -> ???
Step 4 -> Profit!!!
Logic requires each leap have valid access to the next, and so far a few of the logical leaps are falling short.
Is it that
A: There"s a 50% chance of marriage failure regardless, so you might as well enjoy the fruits of the potential X factor
B: By cheating once, now, the desire to cheat later is abated, and the chances of success of the marriage is increased
C: Odds of the marriage are somehow increased by doing the one thing that usually causes it to fail, in the same way that drinking poison increases one"s life span, or having sex with Amy Winehouse reduces your chance of catching an STD
D: Sharmai just escaped from Bellvue and is confusing the word "logic" with "fairyland dreams from meds"
I"m leaning towards D, but I"ll wait to hear a valid response.
The problem is that you have never once defined how you think the marriage is more likely to succeed based on your infidelity. You just say
Step 1 -> Infidelity ends marriages
Step 2 -> Infidelity
Step 3 -> ???
Step 4 -> Profit!!!
Logic requires each leap have valid access to the next, and so far a few of the logical leaps are falling short.