W
Wrathcaster
Dude, Aamina, why are you so against the idea of posting a pic of your ex-wife, blurred or unblurred, that is not nude?
You say posting someone"s picture without their express consent on a forum with over 2000 people viewing at any time is over the line, well I say A WHORE THAT CHEATED ON YOU IN PARKING LOTS WHEN YOU WERE MARRIED WITH KIDS IS CROSSING THE FUCKING LINE.
There"s nothing illegal about posting a non-nude photo on an internet forum without consent in this context. There"s nothing immoral about it.
I really can"t comprehend why you wouldn"t do that. Not posting the faces of the chicks you"re putting up titpics of? Sure, that"s understandable and getting props on the internet for unblurred faces is not a reason to do it.
But why in the fuck are you still trying to protect your goddawful cunt of an ex-wife?
And please stop with this stupid "banbet" stuff. That"s not how it works around here. TITS OR IT DIDN"T HAPPEN MOTHERFUCKER.
You say posting someone"s picture without their express consent on a forum with over 2000 people viewing at any time is over the line, well I say A WHORE THAT CHEATED ON YOU IN PARKING LOTS WHEN YOU WERE MARRIED WITH KIDS IS CROSSING THE FUCKING LINE.
There"s nothing illegal about posting a non-nude photo on an internet forum without consent in this context. There"s nothing immoral about it.
I really can"t comprehend why you wouldn"t do that. Not posting the faces of the chicks you"re putting up titpics of? Sure, that"s understandable and getting props on the internet for unblurred faces is not a reason to do it.
But why in the fuck are you still trying to protect your goddawful cunt of an ex-wife?
And please stop with this stupid "banbet" stuff. That"s not how it works around here. TITS OR IT DIDN"T HAPPEN MOTHERFUCKER.