aka "We didn't want to pay for CG"They explained they didn't show Stannis' head get cut off because they didn't feel the gratuitous violence would have served a purpose.
That's pretty much what everyone has assumed it would be ever since Stannis lost.I was thinking today, and it's probably either been said or doesn't make sense based on something I've forgotten, but Melisandre said that she saw a victory at winterfell and that Jon Snow was fighting there in the flames. Is it possible that she just assumed it was Stannis' victory but she was actually seeing an attack further in the future where Jon and the Wildlings retake Winterfell and the fact that Stannis would be getting his shit pushed in before that happened was just not mentioned?
cocaineI'm not sure, but Steven King seems to do it also. His books never seem to end as well as the story dictates they should.
Everything Melisandre sees in the flames is true, it just sometimes isn't true the way she thinks it is.I was thinking today, and it's probably either been said or doesn't make sense based on something I've forgotten, but Melisandre said that she saw a victory at winterfell and that Jon Snow was fighting there in the flames. Is it possible that she just assumed it was Stannis' victory but she was actually seeing an attack further in the future where Jon and the Wildlings retake Winterfell and the fact that Stannis would be getting his shit pushed in before that happened was just not mentioned?
Yeah because stabbing a pregnant woman in the stomach (who wasn't even AT the wedding in the books) wasn't gratuitous.They explained they didn't show Stannis' head get cut off because they didn't feel the gratuitous violence would have served a purpose.
Yeah because stabbing a pregnant woman in the stomach (who wasn't even AT the wedding in the books) wasn't gratuitous.
Lol wut.The budgets werent as tight back then. Very likely just a cost saving move not showing the decapitation of Stanis.
What are you talking about? Both Whitewalkers and dragons are in the story. So he's going to have to deal with them eventually. Pretending after all this time that they aren't that important in the overall story arc would be dumb as shit. I agree with what others have stated as well: when he first began writing the books he said "snow zombies, cool, they'll be interesting to have in there. And dragons, have to have dragons." So now they're in the story but serve no real function in moving the plot forward. Now he's stuck with them and he's going to have to find a way to fit them into the conclusion of the tale that doesn't come off as anticlimactic. That's if he ever finishes the series.So your basic argument hinges on conjecture about the outcome of a story based upon what you think the obvious outcomes are despite GRRM constantly going against obvious storylines?