Palum
what Suineg set it to
Porsche is actually thinking of paid DLC for their cars, e.g. have the car drive a race track autonomously how Mark Webber would drive it.
Farnsworth.jpg
Porsche is actually thinking of paid DLC for their cars, e.g. have the car drive a race track autonomously how Mark Webber would drive it.
You know restaurants are regulated right? You work in the fucking food industry and should know this.
And for the record, Meth-hawk, I'm personally cool with the LoL style. Shadow of War was one that I even tolerated but it was pretty damn close to going over the edge, the difference in grinding versus cash was pretty drastic [and it wasn't a fun grind] to do Act 4 - but it still didn't bother me. (SW: Battlefront 2 does sound bad from little comments I've seen, but I've had zero interest so I've not looked any deeper into it, but I know there's lots of "HOLY MTX!" comments)
Yeah? Restaurants can't charge $3 for a drink to go with their meal and $9 for a dessert at the end? I must've missed those regulations ("shell of a meal" + dlc).
Ok. So you're fine with literal thousands of hours of grinding in LoL to unlock the champions but grinding in Shadow of War was worse than that to play act 4? How about the fact that LoL sells mystery champions and mystery skin packages? That's lootboxes thus gambling.
LoL doesnt force you to buy the game and withold content.
Enough with the F2P comparison's to a AAA Box sale game you raging fucking dweeb.
Define withheld content. How long does a company have to wait after releasing a product before they can start producing expansion style content for it without making them scumbags? Has any game ever said "hey buy me for $60 and get 4 acts of content" and then only contained 2 acts of content unless you pay for the third and 4th after?
Ok. So you're fine with literal thousands of hours of grinding in LoL to unlock the champions but grinding in Shadow of War was worse than that to play act 4? How about the fact that LoL sells mystery champions and mystery skin packages? That's lootboxes thus gambling.
So if a game is F2P it's ok if they have gambling, but if it's a "AAA" box game then it's not ok for them to have gambling? Why should there be a double standard on whether or not gambling is acceptable in games?
A F2P has to be almost entirely monetized via MTX or else those people don't have anything to receive a paycheck from - when they're selling a retail product, they're getting a cut of the sales cost of every product that leaves the door; MTX for them is a bonus check, not the entire income stream. It's not a hard concept.
A F2P has to be almost entirely monetized via MTX or else those people don't have anything to receive a paycheck from - when they're selling a retail product, they're getting a cut of the sales cost of every product that leaves the door; MTX for them is a bonus check, not the entire income stream. It's not a hard concept.
So it's ok for them to implement gambling in their MTX because they need to make a living but it's not ok if they're charging for the base game too?
So it's ok for them to implement gambling in their MTX because they need to make a living but it's not ok if they're charging for the base game too?
I used fucking League of Legends as the example because they literally use gambling and paywalls to avoid massively long grinds because those are things you two complain about (lootboxes/shadows of war grind).
Write this down on a poster and throw it on your ceiling.
How about this: The MCU movies all tie together in one huge overarching world (game). The movies are split up into a bunch of different pieces that you have to buy individually (dlc). They have movies planned out well before the previous ones release (withholding parts of the game). Should the government step in and regulate them?
Not even close. Wrong Analogy.
Take your 2 hour movie, cut it down to 45 minutes for the same ticket price without telling anyone before they saw it, and then 2 months later release the other half of the movie for the same ticket price.